
Letter from Seoul: This isn't just another election
That's normal.
People focus on their lives – jobs, family, finances, and the like.
I've been in Seoul, South Korea, for about a week, having been asked to come and see what's going on with the upcoming presidential election.
You wouldn't know that an election that might determine South Korea's future is underway.
The election was called three months ago after conservative president Yoon Suk-yeol's impeachment. He'd declared martial law out of frustration over the leftist-dominated National Assembly using its immense power to make governing impossible.
Yoon called it a 'legislative dictatorship.'
So now it's a race between Lee Jae-myung from the leftist Democratic Party of Korea (DP) and Kim Moon-soo – of the generally conservative People Power Party (PPP).
The DPK contains some hard-core radicals who want to align with the People's Republic of China and North Korea and even end the US-ROK alliance. Lee himself has called the US forces 'occupiers' – and is charged with involvement in sending $8 million to North Korea when he was governor of Gyeonggi Province. One of his lieutenants has already been convicted.
Kim – a former labor activist is pro-US alliance. And he has no illusions about or love for South Korean leftists – having once been one of them – or the Chinese communists and North Korea.
But there is another conservative candidate running. Lee Jun-seok of the small New Reform Party will siphon off votes from Kim.
Polls, not always reliable, put the DPK in the lead.
We will know soon enough.
Two days of early voting are finished and election day is June 3d.
A Kim victory would be better for the US-ROK alliance, although the DP-dominated National Assembly would still make life miserable for a conservative president.
If Lee Jae-myung prevails, things could be very different.
The leftists will have nearly every lever of power in South Korea. They just need the presidency.
They already have the National Assembly (189 seats of 300), much of the judiciary and the police, the media, academia, labor unions and the all-powerful National Election Commission (NEC). Big business has been under attack, and even the ROK military has been put on notice.
South Korean leftists have long wanted total and permanent control. But it started in earnest around 2017 when leftist, Moon Jae-in was elected president following the controversial removal of conservative president Park Chung-hee
If Lee wins, he won't sever the US alliance or nestle up to the PRC and North Korea right away.
US officialdom will tell itself the leftists are pragmatists and won't end the good thing they have with the United States.
But bit by bit the US-ROK relationship will grow colder. Seoul's relationships with Beijing and Pyongyang will warm up. Ties with Japan – improved under President Yoon – will enter the walk-in freezer.
The National Assembly and the leftist president will do whatever they want – and nobody can stop them.
South Korea will effectively be a one-party state.
Future elections won't matter. The National Election Commission will see to that.
It has been stonewalling widespread and detailed citizen-produced evidence of electoral irregularities starting with the 2020 National Assembly election – which gave the DP a solid majority for the first time.
Similar evidence was produced after the 2022 presidential election and the 2024 National Assembly election.
Mention election integrit, however, and South Koreans can find the police at their doorstep and charges leveled.
Being ridiculed as a conspiracy theorist is a given.
But consider the fact that the NEC declared its system was unhackable – when citizens demanded transparency. Yet in 2023 the North Korean Lazarus Group repeatedly hacked the NEC network. Public outcry allowed the National Intelligence Service (not yet entirely under leftist domination) to run penetration tests.
NIS ran wild and reported how the electoral system can be electronically manipulated.
I came to Korea in 2020 to investigate allegations of rigging at the request of concerned citizens.
I expected to find nothing much.
In short order, it was obvious there were problems.
Nothing has changed.
It's still a system ripe for and apparently rife with manipulation. And authorities will not examine the evidence.
Some South Koreans are trying to ensure honest elections. But they are beleaguered.
They would sorely appreciate a kind word from President Trump.
But the Trump administration stands by mute, with eyes primly averted. It declares the relationship 'rock solid' and 'forged in blood? And 'who are we to meddle in another country's politics?'
But rather than electoral interference it would be providing oxygen to people who want to be free and are under pressure. There's nothing wrong with speaking up for consensual government, and civil liberties – and for your friends.
And it puts the bad guys on notice.
If they think America doesn't care or won't do anything at all they'll smother the opposition.
Recall support for dissidents in Russia and Poland and elsewhere in the Cold War?
It mattered.
The US stayed quiet when Hugo Chavez came along in Venezuela in the early 1990's. The honest people just wanted something suggesting USA gave two hoots. They got nothing. And Venezuela is now in the China / Cuba camp.
At least one big problem still remains for the leftists who see their goal in sight. That is the fact that most South Koreans don't want to be like China or North Korea – and support for the US alliance is strong, even among more than a few Democratic Party voters.
And Koreans can be mercurial. They may not quietly go along with what South Korea's hard-core radicals have in mind.
So this isn't just another election. If Washington hasn't paid proper attention to South Korea yet, it will have no choice but to do so before long.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US Senate passes aid, public broadcasting cuts in victory for Trump
The US Senate early on Thursday approved President Donald Trump's plan for billions of dollars in cuts to funding for foreign aid and public broadcasting, handing the Republican president another victory as he exerts control over Congress with little opposition. The Senate voted 51 to 48 in favour of Trump's request to cut US$9 billion in spending already approved by Congress. Most of the cuts are to programmes to assist foreign countries suffering from disease, war and natural disasters, but the plan also eliminates all US$1.1 billion the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was due to receive over the next two years. Trump and many of his fellow Republicans argue that spending on public broadcasting is an unnecessary expense and reject its news coverage as suffering from anti-right bias. Stand-alone rescissions packages have not passed in decades, with lawmakers reluctant to cede their constitutionally mandated control of spending. But Trump's Republicans, who hold narrow majorities in the Senate and House, have shown little appetite for resisting his policies since he began his second term in January. The US$9 billion at stake is minuscule in the context of the US$6.8 trillion federal budget, and represents only a tiny portion of all the funds approved by Congress that the Trump administration has held up while it has pursued sweeping cuts, many ordered by billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's crusade against the Fed turning US into an emerging market
If US President Donald Trump had his way, the Federal Reserve's benchmark interest rate would stand at 1 per cent instead of the current level of between 4.25 and 4.5 per cent. In a handwritten note to Fed chair Jerome Powell on June 30, Trump renewed his attack on the head of the world's most important central bank, accusing Powell of costing the country 'a fortune' by refusing to reduce borrowing costs more aggressively. Advertisement As far as Trump is concerned, there is 'no inflation' in the United States. In his note to Powell, scribbled over a table of interest rates in 44 countries, Trump said the Fed's policy rate should be among the lowest in the world, putting America in a group of nations that includes Switzerland and Thailand, where borrowing costs currently stand at zero and 1.75 per cent, respectively. Never mind that both of these countries are currently experiencing deflation. That is compared with an annual inflation rate last month of 2.7 per cent in the US, slightly higher than in May amid signs higher trade tariffs are starting to push up prices Trump does not care about the intricacies of data points. His only concern is that the Fed loosens monetary policy as quickly and as sharply as possible to help stimulate growth and lower debt-servicing costs. While the president has denied he intends to fire Powell, whose term as Fed chair expires in May 2026, he is doing his utmost to hound him out of office in one of the fiercest attacks on the independence of the US central bank. Financial markets have largely given Trump a free pass since he returned to the White House. With the exception of a brief period of intense selling pressure in bond and equity markets in early April following Trump's announcement of sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs on nearly all US trading partners – the sell-off gave way to a dramatic rally after Trump suspended the levies – investors have downplayed the damage wrought by Trump's assault on domestic and international institutions and norms. Advertisement While many analysts point to the Taco trade – an investment strategy based on expectations that 'Trump always chickens out', especially when it comes to tariffs – the reality is that markets have never really challenged Trump. The S&P 500 equity index stands at a record high while the yield on the 10-year Treasury bond is at 4.5 per cent, down from 4.8 per cent just before Trump began his second term.


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US-China trade deal may resemble phase 1 agreement from Trump's first term: ex-official
The US-China deal under negotiation is likely to bear similarities to the phase one trade agreement from Donald Trump's first term, according to a former senior official in that administration – offering clues to what the highly anticipated pact may look like just weeks before a trade truce between the two rival economies is set to expire. The agreement is 'very likely to resemble, in its broad contours, the phase one trade deal negotiated between 2017 and 2020, and at the heart of that was a substantial purchase of US agricultural and industrial goods', said Stephen Biegun, deputy secretary of state under Donald Trump from 2019 to 2021, at the Aspen Security Forum on Wednesday. Under the deal struck in 2020, China agreed to buy an additional US$200 billion worth of American goods and services over two years compared to 2017 levels. Much of that deal did not materialise, partly due to the economic devastation caused by the Covid-19 pandemic that began soon after the agreement was signed. Trump officials have, to varying degrees, signalled a desire to revive the deal . On the first day of his second term, the US president signed an executive order directing a review of China's compliance with the agreement. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is leading the current trade negotiations, has cited Beijing's failure to meet its commitments as something to 'take into account' – and called the phase one deal a 'road map' for current talks. Explaining why he expects a similar framework this time, Biegun said Chinese officials have recognised that they have to 'pay a certain price' to create 'at least some temporary balance in the US-China trade relationship'. 'The [US] president uses the trade balance as his singular yardstick to measure the economic fairness in bilateral relations with any country around the world, including allies,' Biegun explained. 'And it's no different in the case of China.'