What's in Trump's big, beautiful bill? Tax cuts, deportations and more
Here's what's in the Senate's version of the bill:
After taking office in 2017, Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered taxes and increased the standard deduction for all taxpayers, but generally benefited high earners more than most. Those provisions are set to expire after this year, but the big, beautiful bill makes them permanent, while increasing the standard deduction by $1,000 for individuals, $1,500 for heads of households and $2,000 for married couples, albeit only through 2028.
The bill has an array of new tax write-offs – but only while Trump is president. Several of the new exemptions stem from promises Trump made while campaigning last year. Taxpayers will be able to write off income from tips and overtime, and interest made on loans to purchase cars assembled in the United States. People aged 65 and over are eligible for an additional deduction of $6,000, provided their adjusted gross income does not exceed $75,000 for single filers or $150,000 for couples. But all of these incentives expire at the end of 2028, right before Trump's term as president ends.
As part of Trump's plan to remove undocumented immigrants from the country, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) will receive $45bn for detention facilities, $14bn for deportation operations and billions of dollars more to hire an additional 10,000 new agents by 2029. More than $50bn is allocated for the construction of new border fortifications, which will probably include a wall along the border with Mexico.
Republicans have attempted to cut down on the bill's cost by slashing two major federal safety net programs: Medicaid, which provides healthcare to poor and disabled Americans, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which helps people afford groceries. Both are in for funding cuts, as well as new work requirements. The left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates the Medicaid changes could cost as many as 10.6 million people their healthcare, and about eight million people, or one in five recipients, their Snap benefits.
The bill will phase out many tax incentives created by Congress during Joe Biden's presidency meant to encourage consumers and businesses to use electric vehicles and other clean energy technology. Credits for cleaner cars will end this year, as will subsidies for Americans seeking to upgrade their homes to cleaner or more energy efficient appliances. While a draft of the bill targeted wind and solar energy projects with a new excise tax, senators voted to remove that at the last minute.
One of the thorniest issues the bill addresses is how much relief to provide from state and local taxes (Salt), which many Americans must also pay in addition to their federal tax. Several House Republicans representing districts in Democrat-led states withheld their support from the bill until the Salt deductibility cap was raised from $10,000 to $40,000, but Senate Republicans made clear they would change that. The Senate's version keeps the $40,000 cap, but only through 2028.
The bill will increase the US government's authority to borrow, known as the debt limit, by $5tn. The US treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, has predicted the government will hit the limit by August, at which point it could default on its debt and spark a financial crisis.
Wealthier taxpayers appear set to receive more benefits from this bill than poorer ones, according to The Budget Lab at Yale University. Taxpayers in the lowest income quintile will see a 2.5% decrease in their incomes, largely due to the Snap and Medicaid cuts, while the highest earners will see their incomes grow by 2.4%, the Budget Lab estimated. The impact could change based on what amendments the Senate adopts.
Despite the GOP's attempts to use the bill as a vehicle to rein in government spending, the bill would increase the deficit by $3.3tn through 2034, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office. Most of that price tag is the extension of the 2017 tax cuts. The heavy budgetary impact could complicate the bill's chances of passing the House, where fiscal hardliners have demanded budget deficit reductions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
30 minutes ago
- NBC News
Republicans scramble to corral support for Trump megabill ahead of House vote
WASHINGTON — House Republican leaders are moving rapidly on Wednesday to try to pass the party's massive domestic policy package after the Senate approved it, launching a full-court press and enlisting the help of President Donald Trump to sway a broad group of holdouts. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., can only afford three defections to pass the legislation through his narrow majority, presuming all members attend and Democrats vote against it. Johnson privately huddled just off Capitol Hill with members of the hardline House Freedom Caucus, who are demanding deeper spending cuts. At the White House, Trump was holding multiple meetings with holdouts and on-the-fence members, one GOP lawmaker said, including with the moderate members of the Republican Main Street Caucus. Within hours of it narrowly passing the Senate Tuesday, House Republicans advanced the bill through the Rules Committee by a margin of 7-6, with Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, and Ralph Norman, R-S.C., voting "no" due to concerns that it would add to the debt. Several House conservatives complained that the spending cuts were insufficient after shrinking in the Senate package. They raged against the fact that various provisions were stripped out due to budget rules in the chamber, including immigration-related restrictions they strongly support. But nearly all of those lawmakers have developed a track record of folding and voting in alignment with Trump when the pressure is on them. GOP leaders are counting on them to do so again. One House Republican lawmaker said conservatives in the Freedom Caucus used to get political cover from groups like Club for Growth, but Trump has scrambled the calculus on the right. The Club for Growth is backing the bill, and conservative figures like Russell Vought and Stephen Miller are in Trump's inner circle and some of the loudest cheerleaders for the package. Freedom Caucus members 'have no cover' if they vote no, the lawmaker said Wednesday. 'Who's going to protect them from Trump? Thomas Massie?' Trump has been in a bitter feud with conservative Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., threatening to recruit a primary challenger against him after he was one of just two Republicans who voted against the House bill in May. Massie, who walks around Capitol Hill wearing a live debt clock, has said the legislation would make the deficit situation worse and has continued to rail against it. And politically vulnerable Republicans were unhappy with the more aggressive Medicaid cuts in the Senate bill, along with a series of clean energy funding rollbacks that they warned against. The Senate-passed bill would add $3.3 trillion to the national debt over 10 years, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which found that the loss of revenue from tax cuts would outstrip the spending cuts in the legislation. The legislation would extend the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017 while boosting funding for immigration enforcement and the military. It would also makes significant cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and clean energy funding, while raising the debt limit by $5 trillion. On the Capitol steps Wednesday morning, Democrats blasted the legislation as a massive tax cut for the wealthiest Americans, paid for by slashing programs that help the working class. "It is the cruelest bill that I've ever seen in my tenure in the House of Representatives," said Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., the ranking member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who has served in the House since 1988.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Staunch election denier appointed to Georgia county's board of elections
An Atlanta-area county has appointed a staunch election denier, with a history of challenging voter registrations, to the county's board of registration and elections, a pivotal position to cast doubt on the results of future elections. DeKalb county's Republican committee nominated Gail Lee and a second Republican activist, but the nomination of William Henderson was rejected last week by the chief judge of the DeKalb county superior court, Shondeana Morris, after a letter campaign against the two promoted by the county's Democratic committee and voting rights activists. Lee has challenged the registration of hundreds of voters in DeKalb County since the 2020 election, beginning her efforts after Donald Trump's narrow loss to Joe Biden in 2020. Lee told CBS News in December 2023 that she still believed Trump won, and attended a 2022 conference in Georgia hosted by the Election Integrity Network – a 2020 election denialist group linked to the Trump campaign. 'Putting a known election denier who has repeatedly tried to remove voters from the rolls on the DeKalb county elections board is a slap in the face to DeKalb voters,' Kristin Nabers, Georgia state director for the voting rights advocacy organization All Voting is Local, said in a statement. 'Lee is the architect of mass voter challenges against her neighbors in DeKalb county,' she added. 'Time and time again, she has attempted to strip Georgians of their right to vote and perpetuated a stream of lies about our elections and the hardworking officials who administer them. Those who repeatedly push lies about voting and support dangerous attempts to overturn the results should have no say over our elections.' Lee did not return a call and text seeking comment. About 370,000 of DeKalb county's 500,000 registered voters cast a ballot in the 2024 presidential election, and Kamala Harris won 82% of them, representing about one in eight votes she won in the state. The county's Republican and Democratic parties each nominate two people to serve on the county's elections board in four-year terms. The fifth member is named by the county's chief superior court judge. In a letter explaining her rejection of Henderson, Morris cited 'over 200 pieces of correspondence from the public' as well as his public statements and 'an ongoing lawsuit filed by Mr. Henderson against the board.' Henderson is also a prolific challenger of voter registrations in DeKalb county. In 2024, Henderson filed a lawsuit in superior court alleging the DeKalb county board of registration and elections violated the law by refusing to consider challenges to voters' eligibility within 90 days of the election. Morris cited the suit as a conflict creating an impediment to his appointment. 'I do not believe that appointing Mr. Henderson to the board would further the goals of ensuring that elections are credible and trustworthy in the eyes of the public,' Morris wrote. 'Rather, I am concerned that his appointment would do the opposite, as he has already sought to do through his public statements in the past.' Henderson disagreed with Morris's decision, describing his legal action as a writ of mandamus and not a lawsuit. Asked if he believed the 2020 election had been fairly conducted, Henderson said: 'The 2020 election happened five years ago and it's not anything that we should be concerned with right now.' He added that asking the question at all was indicative of bias. 'My whole reason for being involved in this is to try and make sure that our voter roll is accurate, concise, legal and clean,' Henderson said. He characterized the opposition to his nomination as 'manufactured' by Democrats and the League of Women Voters through a social media campaign. 'I don't think those 200 letters were relevant.'
Spectator
36 minutes ago
- Spectator
The new right is splintering
When Elon Musk tweeted his vision for an 'America Party', he ignited a firestorm of hope and scepticism. The idea was inspired by his anger for Donald Trump's $5 trillion spending bill. In the UK, Ben Habib and Rupert Lowe, formerly figures in Reform, have splintered away from Britain's populist party over splits with Nigel Farage. Musk, Habib and Lowe are all disruptors united by disdain for broken systems, and all face harsh electoral realities. In the US, a hypothetical Musk-led party could split the Republican vote, potentially handing Democrats victories. Habib and Lowe could dilute the populist vote in the UK, most of which is currently with Reform. Musk's flirtation with a new political movement stems from his clash with Trump over fiscal policy. Musk's platform – slashing deficits, deregulating business and boosting high-skilled immigration – appeals to tech-savvy moderates and disillusioned independents. On X, Musk has framed himself as a voice for the pragmatic middle, critiquing both parties' extremes. But his vision lacks the cultural red meat – 'America First' border control or anti-woke rhetoric – that fuels Trump's MAGA base. Musk's $250 million investment in America PAC for Trump's 2024 campaign shows his financial clout, but he would struggle to go it alone. The US electoral landscape is unforgiving to new parties. In 1992, Ross Perot's Reform party won 19 per cent of the vote but zero electoral votes, a cautionary tale for any Musk-led venture. State-by-state ballot access laws, such as California's requirement of roughly 131,000 signatures, would also pose logistical hurdles. Musk's wealth – estimated at $400 billion in 2025 – could fund signature drives and ad campaigns, but building a national infrastructure by 2026 is daunting. Republican strategists have suggested that Musk could reshape the party from within, using his America PAC influence and X's narrative-shaping power, rather than risk starting a third party and failing. Others have warned that his centrist pitch – pro-immigration, pro-tech – alienates voters demanding border security and cultural conservatism. Polls, while unconfirmed for 2025, suggest Republicans view third-party efforts sceptically. Across the Atlantic, Habib and Lowe embody a parallel populist surge. Habib has launched a new political party, Advance UK, which he says stands for a 'proud' and 'independent' United Kingdom, where 'the political views you hold won't land you in jail'. It is billed as an alternative to Reform. Lowe, meanwhile, has just launched Restore Britain, a 'movement' that will pressure political parties to 'slash immigration, protect British culture, restore Christian principles, carpet-bomb the cancer of wokery'. The UK's first-past-the-post system is brutal – Reform's 14 per cent in 2024 yielded just five MPs – and so a fragmented populist vote could split the right and gift Labour seats. Populism in the US and UK shares politics but fights different battles. Musk decries bureaucratic bloat and unfulfilled 2016 promises, while Habib and Lowe target Labour's cultural shifts and attack Farage personally. Musk's X is the transatlantic wildcard, shaping narratives but fuelling polarisation. Reports earlier this year suggested Musk was thinking about making a significant investment in UK politics. In the US, his $250 million America PAC war chest (and X's reach) give him leverage, but Republican loyalties and the Electoral College limit third-party impact. Disruption without cohesion breeds division. The US and the UK need fresh ideas, but splitting conservative votes could empower the elites they oppose. The lesson is clear: conservatives must channel their zeal to reform existing parties from within. To do otherwise risks electoral failure.
