
Europe's 'MEGA' Stutter: Far-Right Bid for Power Falters Despite Gains
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Pro-EU candidate Nicușor Dan defeated hard-right contender George Simion in Romania's presidential election, delivering a centrist victory in Europe over a nationalist rival who had pledged to put the country on a path inspired by U.S. President Donald Trump.
The result follows concerns about a populist wave on the continent, with the EU launching an investigation into Elon Musk's promotion of far-right candidates in Europe.
In January, the X owner used the slogan "Make Europe Great Again," or MEGA, in a nod to Trump's catchphrase.
Despite the defeat of Simion, who had once appealed to U.S. Republicans for support, right-wing parties had mixed fortunes in the weekend's elections elsewhere in Europe, making gains in Portugal's parliament but losing out in the first round of Poland's presidential ballot.
Bucharest Mayor Nicușor Dan salutes his supporters as he exits his campaign headquarters in Bucharest on May 18, 2025, after defeating nationalist George Simion in the presidential election.
Bucharest Mayor Nicușor Dan salutes his supporters as he exits his campaign headquarters in Bucharest on May 18, 2025, after defeating nationalist George Simion in the presidential election.Why It Matters
In January, Bloomberg reported that the EU was investigating whether Musk's social network X, formerly Twitter, breached the bloc's content moderation law in a move linked to concern over his use of the platform to promote right-wing candidates globally.
Musk has backed Europe's hard-right parties, including the AfD party candidates in Germany's federal election. He posted in January: "From MAGA to MEGA: Make Europe Great Again" in an echo of the rallying cry for Trump.
The victory of Simion in the first round of the Romanian election raised concerns about a right-wing wave spreading across Europe. But elections in Poland also pointed to a pivot back to the center.
What To Know
Simion won in Romania's election first round, but results from Sunday's second stage saw him trail Nicusor Dan by eight percentage points, 54 percent to 46 percent, Reuters reported Monday.
Simion had looked to Trump for inspiration, appearing at a Republican CPAC and previously asking for Musk's support.
Oana Popescu-Zamfir, director of the Bucharest-based think tank GlobalFocus Center, told Newsweek on Monday that the result showed it is harder for the MAGA recipe to work outside the U.S.
She said the far-right has had an abrupt rise in Romania thanks to disillusionment with the political class and with the quality of governance. But when presented with a candidate who appeared more capable, more competent and "perhaps more presidential...then that tide was quite quickly turned."
In emailed comments to Newsweek, Daniel Fried, distinguished fellow at the Atlantic Council, said that Simion courted Trump's Make America Great Again movement, traveling to the Conservative Political Action Conference and appearing on Steve Bannon's podcast, "but this did not translate into support at home."
Poland And Portugal
The first round of Poland's presidential election saw the liberal mayor of Warsaw, Rafał Trzaskowski, part of Prime Minister Donald Tusk's Civic Platform Party, defeat his right-wing rival, Karol Nawrocki, backed by the populist right-wing Law and Justice (PiS).
Despite the narrow win by Trzaskowski—31.36 percent to 29.54 percent—a surprise was how right-wing and far-right candidates gathered as many as 54 percent of the votes.
That will give Nawrocki a larger pool of the electorate to draw on in the second round, Piotr Buras, head of the Warsaw office of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), told Newsweek.
Buras said the next two weeks will see a confrontation between a pro-EU, liberal and progressive version of Poland versus a nationalist, "Trumpist" and conservative one.
Nawrocki will have to stress his anti-European positions, even more than he was doing before, and he will also try to present himself as a faithful ally of Trump and the U.S., Buras added.
In Portugal, the ruling center-right coalition Democratic Alliance (AD/PSD-CDS) remained the strongest political force, getting 32 percent of votes and securing 89 seats in the 230-seat parliament—nine more than in the previous election.
However, the far-right Chega party gained a record 22.6 percent share of the vote, gaining eight seats for a total of 58.
Prime Minister Luis Montenegro said the result was a vote of confidence in his party, but with votes from abroad still to be counted, Chega could replace the center-left socialists as the main opposition party.
What People Are Saying
Oana Popescu-Zamfir, director of the Bucharest-based think tank GlobalFocus Center: "I think we're seeing that the far right is not as entrenched as it might look."
Piotr Buras, ECFR: "Right wing and far-right candidates gathered as many as 54 percent of votes—this is the most surprising result.
"The campaign in the next two weeks will be very polarizing and brutal—a confrontation of two visions of Poland: pro-EU, liberal and progressive versus nationalist, Trumpist and conservative."
What Happens Next
Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky was among leaders who praised Dan's victory in Romania as it maintains Bucharest's backing for Kyiv's fight against Russia at the heart of the EU. Voters in Poland will head to the polls on June 1 in what is expected to be a tight race with the prospect that Nawrocki could pick up the right-wing vote.
Portugal awaits the final results, which could allow Chega, led by the former television sports commentator Andre Ventura, to emerge as the main opposition party, although Montenegro has ruled out forming a coalition with it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
5 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump accuses Obama of treason. Obama calls it a 'weak attempt at distraction'
President Donald Trump is ramping up accusations that former President Barack Obama was involved in a 2016 conspiracy to undermine Trump's victory, which the former president's office called a 'weak attempt at distraction.' When asked about the Epstein case in the Oval Office on July 22, Trump pivoted quickly to an attack on Obama. "The witch hunt that you should be talking about is they caught President Obama absolutely cold," Trump said, going on to accuse him of treason without providing evidence, Reuters reported. Trump also said in a July 21 Truth Social post that Obama manufactured the "Russia HOAX." Obama has not been arrested or charged. Trump's comments follow Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's claim she has evidence of a "treasonous conspiracy" related to the intelligence about Russian interference in the 2016 election. The focus on Obama comes as the Trump administration continues to receive backlash from some Republicans over the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's criminal files. Putting attention on the 2016 election and investigations into Russia's interference could be part of a broader effort to distract from the Epstein fallout, according to The Washington Post and Axios. "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama, said in an emailed statement. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction." More: Jeffrey Epstein is sowing division among MAGA. What to know about the late sex offender Trump posted fake AI video of Obama, but he wasn't actually arrested Trump has long criticized Obama. Before becoming a presidential candidate, Trump repeatedly spread false rumors that Obama wasn't born in the U.S., and wasn't eligible to be the president. But since returning to office this year, Reuters reported Trump had not gone so far as to accuse Obama of a crime. The accusations come after a deepfake video depicting Obama's arrest (which did not happen). The July 20 post on Truth Social was a TikTok video by an account named "neo8171," with a montage of Democratic elected officials saying "no one is above the law." While it is unclear where the clips were from, Democrats have used that phrase when talking about Trump's criminal cases, including an arrest in Georgia and a felony conviction in New York. The video then shows Pepe the Frog, a popular internet meme that was added to a hate symbol database during the 2016 election. As "YMCA" starts to play, the video shows Trump and Obama sitting in the Oval Office, and an artificially rendered scene shows FBI agents dragging Obama out of his chair and cuffing his hands behind his back. The fake video then shows Obama in an orange jumpsuit in jail. A representative for Obama previously declined to comment on the fake AI video. Gabbard, Trump revisit 2016 Russian interference amid Epstein backlash On July 18, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard issued a press release saying she had evidence that the Obama administration after the 2016 election produced "politicized intelligence that was used as the basis for countless smears seeking to delegitimize President Trump's victory." In 2020, a Republican-led, bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee backed the conclusion of the intelligence agencies that found Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election in favor of Trump. Trump had long said the investigation into his campaign was a hoax. Ranking Member on the Intelligence Committee Rep. Jim Himes, D-Connecticut, said Gabbard's new claim is a "dangerous lie," while speaking on CBS News' "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," on July 20. He said Gabbard is using a "sleight of hand" by focusing on intelligence about Russia's failed voting infrastructure manipulation rather than Russia's meddling to discredit Trump's 2016 Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton. "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes," Rodenbush said in the July 22 statement. Appearing on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures," Gabbard said she intended to send her findings to the Department of Justice and the FBI for criminal referral. 'As is always the case, President Trump was right about the Obama-Biden administration's clear involvement in the greatest witch hunt in American history and the genesis of the decade-long hoax saga that tore our nation apart and undermined the will of the people," White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in an emailed statement previously shared with USA TODAY. "The President and his entire administration are committed to unearthing wrongdoing and holding any individual accountable for this gross abuse of power and blatant conspiracy against President Trump and his supporters.' Contributing: Kevin Johnson, Kristine Phillips, USA TODAY; Reuters Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @


USA Today
5 minutes ago
- USA Today
Two big cases underway over Trump's higher education policy. Here are the key takeaways
BOSTON ― A federal courthouse was the epicenter of the legal world on July 21 as federal judges heard arguments in two cases surrounding the Trump administration's efforts to revoke federal funding from Harvard University and to deport foreign-born student protesters for pro-Palestinian activism. In courtroom 18 at the John Joseph Moakley U.S. Courthouse, U.S. District Judge William Young heard closing arguments in American Association of University Professors (AAUP) v. Rubio. The organization's chapters at several universities, as well as the Middle East Studies Association, sued Secretary of State Marco Rubio in March over what it described as an "ideological deportation policy" the administration was using to retaliate against noncitizens for pro-Palestinian speech. Steps away, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs heard oral arguments in Harvard's lawsuit against the administration over the more than $2.5 billion in federal funding it pulled from the school, citing its alleged inaction on antisemitism. The First Amendment lies at the heart of both cases, which could have significant implications for the future of higher education and free speech in the U.S. Here are key takeaways from the trials. Research, civil rights and lives are at stake, attorneys say Harvard's attorneys argued that the loss of federal funding would significantly damage the school's ability to conduct research that serves a public benefit while not meaningfully addressing antisemitism, NPR reported. The Trump administration, on the other hand, said Harvard's Jewish students are harmed by the school's alleged inaction on antisemitism, which it has said amounts to a violation of federal civil rights law. The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, along with co-counsel Sher Tremonte law firm, sued Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Trump administration on behalf of the association's chapters at several universities, including Harvard, and the Middle East Studies Association in March. In AAUP v. Rubio, attorneys from the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and Sher Tremonte law firm argued that the Trump administration's 'ideological deportation policy' affected not only the activists who have been arrested thus far but created a chilling effect on the free speech of noncitizen students and faculty. The government's attorneys disputed the existence of such a policy. If it did exist, lawyer William Kanellis said, 'you'd see many more arrests.' Judges questioned some arguments Both judges were skeptical of some of the arguments attorneys attempted to make in their courtrooms. The notion that the government has the authority to slash Harvard's federal funding for any reason was a 'major stumbling block for me,' Burroughs said. She said there would be 'staggering' implications for constitutional law if the government had the power to make such decisions 'for reasons oriented around speech.' Burroughs also questioned how revoking Harvard's federal grants contributed to the government's stated objective of combatting antisemitism at the university, as the Harvard Crimson reported. Young, meanwhile, appeared skeptical of the AAUP's argument that the Trump administration created and implemented a new 'ideological deportation' policy. He also questioned the plaintiff's arguments surrounding Canary Mission, an organization that says it 'documents individuals and organizations that promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews on North American college campuses and beyond.' The plaintiff's attorneys characterized it as an extremist group the government relied upon to identify noncitizens for investigation and arrest. Young was skeptical of the attorneys' characterization of the group and said it's 'perfectly appropriate for the government to take leads from any source.' First Amendment issues at the heart of both cases Alexandra Conlon, a representing the plaintiffs in the deportation case, said that by revoking visas and green cards based on noncitizens' pro-Palestinian activism, the federal government was 'systematically violating the First Amendment' and seeking to chill speech it disagrees with. On the first day of the trial, Justice Department attorney Victoria Santora said the First Amendment applies to both citizens and noncitizens alike. But she later backtracked to say 'there are nuances to the First Amendment,' Politico reported. Department of Justice attorney Ethan Kanter continued that argument July 21, saying noncitizens do not have First Amendment rights to the same extent as U.S. citizens. While they may have such rights in some capacity, he said, they are 'context dependent and in relation to the compelling government interest at play.' Lawyer Steven P. Lehotsky, representing Harvard in the funding lawsuit, said the administration's actions against the university reflect a 'blatant, unrepentant violation of the First Amendment,' the Harvard Crimson reported. Administration's moves are 'part of a broader attack' Ramya Krishnan, a Knight First Amendment Institute attorney representing the AAUP in the deportation case, said both that case and the one over Harvard's federal funding were part of the Trump administration's higher education "power grab." 'These are part of a broader attack on higher education in this country in weakening the independence of these institutions, in undermining them as a site for discourse and intellectual inquiry," she said, "and I think that people should be very worried about that.' The Trump administration has accused schools of engaging in "exploitative and unlawful practices" and said its steps to overhaul higher education would "rebuild public trust" in such institutions. Burroughs said she would issue an opinion in the Harvard case soon after oral arguments concluded on July 21, the Harvard Crimson reported. The school has requested a ruling by Sept. 3, which is its deadline for submitting paperwork to close out its federal grant funding. Young did not offer a timeline for issuing his opinion in the deportation case. BrieAnna Frank is a First Amendment Reporting Fellow at USA TODAY. Reach her at bjfrank@ USA TODAY's coverage of First Amendment issues is funded through a collaboration between the Freedom Forum and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.


New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
House panel votes to rename DC opera house after Melania Trump
WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives quietly took a step Tuesday toward renaming the Kennedy Center's iconic opera house after first lady Melania Trump. Language inaugurating the Melania Trump Opera House was tucked by Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho) into an amendment to a government funding bill that cleared the House Appropriations Committee. 'Naming the Opera House at the Kennedy Center after [Melania Trump] is an excellent way to recognize the first lady's appreciation for the arts,' Simpson declared after lawmakers approved the amendment. Advertisement 'I am proud to honor her support and commitment in promoting the arts and humanities.' 3 The measure is intended to honor First Lady Melania Trump's 'commitment in promoting the arts.' Getty Images Advertisement 3 President Trump has dramatically shaken up the Kennedy Center during his second term in the White House. AP The amendment cleared the Appropriations panel by a 33-25 vote, with Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) joining Republicans in backing it. The opera house, one of three major performing venues at the waterfront complex which opened in 1971, seats 2,347 patrons and is the home theater of the Washington National Opera as well as the site of the televised Kennedy Center Honors every December. Back in February, President Trump declared himself the chairman of the Kennedy Center and retooled its Board of Trustees. Advertisement 'Just last year, the Kennedy Center featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth – THIS WILL STOP,' Trump proclaimed on Truth Social at the time. 'The Kennedy Center is an American Jewel, and must reflect the brightest STARS on its stage from all across our Nation. For the Kennedy Center, THE BEST IS YET TO COME!' Last month, the president and first lady attended a performance of 'Les Misérables,' whose show-stopper 'Can You Hear The People Sing?' has been featured at Trump's campaign rallies. 3 Rep. Mike Simpson's amendment cleared the Appropriations Committee, but it is unclear whether it will become law. AP The House Appropriations Committee advanced its government funding bill for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations, which is one of 12 bills Congress needs to pass by Oct. 1 to fund the government. Advertisement But that bill, which funds agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of the Interior, and the US Forest Service, still needs to clear the full House and the Senate, where Democrats can filibuster. Simpson's amendment is the latest in a series of Republican tributes to the president. In January, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) introduced a bill to put Trump's face on Mount Rushmore. Several weeks later, freshman Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) unveiled a proposal to put the 45th and 47th president's face on the $100 bill. Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) introduced legislation in February to designate Trump's birthday — June 14 — a national holiday, while Rep. Andy Ogles (R-Tenn.) pushed a measure to enable Trump to run for a third term. In May, Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) proposed a bill to block federal funds for the Washington, DC underground transit system until it renames the Metrorail as the 'TRUMP TRAIN.' Multiple Republicans have also called for Trump to be given a Nobel Peace Prize for his foreign policy successes.