Samsung's pushing some users to turn on their phone's anti-theft features — what you need to know
Phone makers have been doing a lot to better secure users' phones in recent years, and just last year, Android added a bunch of anti-theft features to help lock down your phone. But it relies on you turning those features on, which is the goal of Samsung's latest campaign.
The phone maker has teamed up with the U.K.'s Home Office to educate Galaxy phone owners about these new anti-theft features — and to encourage them to switch them on.
As part of this, Samsung will be sending push notifications to Samsung account holders in the U.K. Apparently, the message started rolling out yesterday (June 2) and will be reaching all 40 million U.K. Samsung account holders by the end of the week — through both the Samsung Members platform and social media.
Which is a suspiciously high figure, considering the U.K. has a population of 68 million, and means some of the people getting that message may not be Galaxy phone owners. But considering these kinds of features are also available on iPhones and other Androids, the wider reach certainly isn't a bad thing.
It sucks to have your phone stolen, but anything you can do to make it even less valuable to thieves is a good thing. Not just for the safety of your own data, but also because it means the thief is going to have a much harder time profiting from your misfortune. Which offers a bittersweet satisfaction.
Features on offer include Theft Detection Lock, which locks your phone if it detects motion associated with snatching. Offline Device Lock will also lock down your phone if it's disconnected from a data connection (or Wi-Fi) for an extended period. There's also the classic Remote Lock that lets you initiate a lockdown process using your phone number and a single verification step.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
One UI 7 also adds Identify Check, which locks certain sensitive features behind an extra layer of biometric security if your phone isn't in a pre-set "Safe Place". That way, it's a little harder for thieves to do things like switch off Find My support or reset your account passwords.
Attempts to reset biometric data also come with a one-hour delay, giving users time to remotely lock or wipe their devices before thieves can access sensitive areas of the phone.
One UI 7 is available on Galaxy S25, S24, S23, S22, Galaxy Z Fold 6, Z Flip 6, Z Fold 5 and Z Flip 5 right now. So be sure to turn on all these extra features.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
3 minutes ago
- The Verge
Epic's Game Store is bringing Fortnite back to Google Play
Following an appeals court victory on Thursday, Epic CEO Tim Sweeney tweeted that 'the Epic Games Store for Android will be coming to the Google Play Store.' This is despite Google's plan to appeal the Ninth Circuit panel's decision, which declined to overturn a 2023 jury verdict that Google's app store and payment system had become illegal monopolies. There's no detail yet on timing, but it would make accessing Fortnite and other Epic-distributed games much simpler on Android devices, without relying on sideloading or making deals with phone manufacturers to preload the store. On iPhone and iPad, the mobile version of the Epic Games Store is still only available in the European Union, but Android users could sideload it from the web since the apps launched last fall. Epic may not be the only company to put a rival app store inside of Google's Play Store in the near future. The Ninth Circuit appears to have lifted a stay on the entire permanent injunction that Epic won against Google's app store monopolies, and that injunction would force Google to crack open Android for other third-party stores as well. 'The stay is lifted,' Epic spokesperson Cat McCormack confirms to The Verge. The Epic Games Store on Android maintains your persistent status in games across platforms, and earlier this year, the company brought its weekly free games program to the mobile stores, too. It also has other Epic games, like Fall Guys and Rocket League Sideswipe. In a statement provided to The Verge, Google's global head of regulatory affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland said, 'This decision will significantly harm user safety, limit choice, and undermine the innovation that has always been central to the Android ecosystem. Our top priority remains protecting our users, developers and partners, and maintaining a secure platform as we continue our appeal.' Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Richard Lawler Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Android Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Antitrust Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gaming Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech
The Verge
20 minutes ago
- The Verge
Epic just won its Google lawsuit again, and Android may never be the same
Epic has won again. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will not overturn the unanimous jury verdict from 2023 that Google's app store and payments system have become illegal monopolies — and it appears to be pressing play on a previously paused permanent injunction that would crack open Android to undo the damage of those monopolies. Today, a three-judge panel affirmed the lower court's decision in Epic v. Google, according to an full opinion you can read below — and Google will now appeal again, the company confirms to The Verge. It could be appealed to the Supreme Court next. Judge M. Margaret McKeown begins her opinion for the panel: In the world of adrenaline-fueled survival that epitomizes the video game Fortnite, winners are decided in blazes of destruction and glory. By contrast, the outcome of this case—centered on Fortnite's developer, Epic Games, and the Google Android platform—turns on longstanding principles of trial procedure, antitrust, and injunctive remedies. 'Total victory in the Epic v Google appeal!' tweets Epic CEO Tim Sweeney. Google will appeal: 'This decision will significantly harm user safety, limit choice, and undermine the innovation that has always been central to the Android ecosystem. Our top priority remains protecting our users, developers and partners, and maintaining a secure platform as we continue our appeal,' writes Google global head of regulatory affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland in a statement shared with The Verge. But the Google Play Store may not be protected from the consequences of its monopoly while Google appeals — it may need to start cracking open Android for third-party stores the way Judge James Donato ruled in his permanent injunction back in 2024. Last October, Donato pressed pause on all but one specific piece of his ruling while Google appealed, but today, Judge McKeown writes 'The stay motion on appeal is denied as moot in light of our decision.' 'The stay is lifted,' Epic spokesperson Cat McCormack confirms to The Verge. And as a result, Epic says it will put its own app store within Google's app store. 'Thanks to the verdict, the Epic Games Store for Android will be coming to the Google Play Store!' Sweeney tweeted. The consequences of the full permanent injunction would stretch far beyond Epic's game Fortnite: they would force Google to effectively open up its app store to competition for three whole years. Google would have to distribute other rival app stores within the Google Play store, too, give rivals access to the full catalog of Google Play apps, and it would be banned from a variety of anticompetitive practices including a requirement that apps use Google Play Billing. You can read a summary of the details here. Epic originally sued both Google and Apple in 2020 over the removal of its hit game Fortnite from both stores, though the case was more complicated than that. Epic intentionally used Fortnite as a wedge to challenge the app store monopolies, and in the case of Apple, it mostly lost. The appeals court did recognize Epic's gambit today, writing that 'Google removed Fortnite from the Play Store after Epic embedded secret code into the app's software' that bypassed Google's payment systems. (Epic has never denied it.) But Epic v. Google turned out to be a very different case, we saw when attending the trial in person and reading all the receipts. A jury saw secret revenue sharing deals between Google, smartphone makers, and game developers. The jury saw internal emails between Google execs that suggested Google was scared of how Epic might convince its fellow game developers to join or create rival app stores, creating unwanted competition for Google. Here are a few thoughts about why Epic won against Google, but not Apple. Today, the Ninth Circuit rejected the idea that the decision in the Apple case should impact the Google case, at least in terms of the all-important question of market definition, aka 'can Google really have a monopoly on Android apps if it's competing against Apple?' 'The market definition question was neither identical to the issue in this case nor litigated and decided in Apple,' McKeown writes, adding that the 'commercial realities are different': Apple's 'walled garden' is, as the district court in Apple noted, markedly different from Google's 'open distribution' approach […] Google admits as much, noting that 'Android's open philosophy offers users and developers wider choices' than iOS does, even as that openness 'limit[s] Google's ability to directly protect users from encountering malware and security threats when they download apps.' As a consequence of its business model, Apple does not license iOS to other OEMs in the way that Google licenses Android to Samsung, Motorola, and other smartphone manufacturers. She also uses McDonalds and Chick-fil-A to make a point that markets can overlap: McDonald's might compete against Chick-fil-A in the fast- food market yet not compete against Chick-fil-A in the hamburger fast-food market (and instead compete with Wendy's, Burger King, Sonic, and In-N-Out Burger. Although Google and Apple compete for mobile-gaming downloads and mobile-gaming in-app transactions, they do not compete in the Android-only app distribution and in-app billing markets. Those two markets, Android app distribution and in-app billing, are where a jury unanimously decided that Google has a monopoly. Developing… we're adding more to this story now, refresh in a few minutes for more. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Sean Hollister Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gaming Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Google Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech
CNBC
33 minutes ago
- CNBC
Apple reports third-quarter earnings after the bell
Apple reports fiscal third-quarter earnings on Thursday after the bell. The June quarter is typically Apple's slowest of the year by sales, ahead of new device launches in September that typically spur the company's biggest sales surge of the year driven in the December quarter. Still, Apple is expected to report nearly $90 billion in overall sales during the period, which would be a 4% increase from last year. Analysts expect it to guide for 3% growth in the September quarter. But there are lots of questions swirling around Apple, whose stock is down 16% so far in 2025. The biggest question facing Apple is what it will say about tariffs. In May, Apple said it would have about $900 million in additional tariff costs in the June quarter, but that it couldn't predict beyond that. Apple will likely update investors on how it sees tariffs affecting the September quarter, a key indicator for how President Donald Trump's trade war is affecting American technology companies. Apple also said in May that it would manufacture U.S.-bound iPhones in India to avoid tariffs on Chinese imports. But the company's move upset Trump, who said after Apple's last earnings call that he didn't want the iPhone maker building in India. India is in line to receive a 25% tariff as soon as Friday. Apple CEO Tim Cook may update investors on its India pivot on Thursday. The company held its annual Worldwide Developers Conference in June, in which it announced major updates to its software for iPhones and other devices. Apple did not, however, announce major new artificial intelligence products or initiatives, disappointing some analysts. However, some investors believe Apple's AI stumbles aren't expected to show up in its results for years. On the brighter side, Cook will likely shout out the movie "F1," which is Apple Original Films' first summer blockbuster and passed $500 million at the global box office last weekend. Here's how Apple is expected to do in the June quarter, per LSEG consensus estimates:
