
Mike Smithson: SA government delivered its budget as if it knows it already has the next election in the bag
The annual document released yesterday was about as interesting to the average voter as watching paint dry.
There were only a few morsels aimed at winning the hearts and minds of battlers because treasury coffers are running low and have taken a substantial hit from Whyalla's demise and the resulting taxpayer cash injection.
This year's budget surplus has been whittled back to a meagre $18 million with state debt forecast to climb to $48 billion by 2029.
Treasurer Stephen Mullighan says there's no need to panic because SA's financial situation is totally manageable.
With an interest bill destined to hit $6.72 million per day others may think otherwise.
This budget smacks of a confident government looking to win next year's election based on the popularity of the Premier who continues to win over punters with his 24/7 charm offensive.
Peter Malinauskas has brought big events to the state such as the AFL Gather Round and LIV Golf which have elevated his status to the national stage.
His negotiating skills are thought by most to be second to none.
Labor holds 28 lower house seats in the state's 47 seat parliament so is as assured of victory as it ever could be.
That's why it didn't need to offer anything extraordinary to voters in a budget which was more about yawn than a new dawn.
Law and order were this year's flavours of budget day leaving SA's police commissioner smiling from ear to ear.
An extra 326 sworn officers will be pounding the beat by 2030 as part of a $395 million package.
There could be two reasons for the sudden windfall in an area which can be easily overlooked.
Commissioner Grant Stevens wields enormous influence and respect as he has since the covid days.
Stephen Mullighan now also wears the dual hat of Police Minister and desperately wants to keep his top cop onside.
But he has multiple juggling acts elsewhere.
Whyalla's steel woes will continue to be a drain on the public purse.
His health budget has blown out by almost half a billion dollars as new services come on-line requiring many more staff who will never be able to keep up with demand.
The spiralling problem of ambulance ramping was conveniently airbrushed from the Treasurer's presentation to the media, despite being one of the government's biggest headaches.
The housing sector claims there wasn't enough in it for them.
Cost of living is crippling families across the state.
And drought affected farmers are also reaching out for more life-saving assistance.
But the government's sights are set on winning next March.
If they're forced to wear the boring badge for this budget, it means they'll have more in the kitty for upcoming election campaign promises.
If Labor does win this predicted landslide election victory, they know they'll probably occupy the treasury benches for at least another eight years.
They can be as tough as they want with future budgets knowing their grip on the purse strings is long term.
But those controlling the levers also know they'll be happily retired on their parliamentary pensions as future generations pay down the massive debt.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
34 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
Protests planned across Australia after Sydney Harbour Bridge march
Protest laws could be repealed or expanded following a march across an iconic national landmark, as activists plan for more demonstrations. The pro-Palestine movement, boosted by a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge which made news across the nation and around the world, hopes to build on its momentum. The march across the bridge and back in pouring rain came after opposition from police, and a court's overruling approval that has politicians worrying about the rare occurrence becoming common. Further protests are planned on August 24 in Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Adelaide and Perth with hopes more can be organised in other cities. Ahead of the state's parliament resuming on Tuesday, NSW Premier Chris Minns says his government is examining whether a legal precedent has been set by the Supreme Court judgment that allowed the protest to proceed. 'No one should believe it's open season on the bridge,' he told reporters on Monday. But new laws might be needed to stop future bridge protests. Minns was 'not ruling anything out' but said any legislation could not be rushed. Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley encouraged the premier to look at 'what might happen next'. 'Because we can't continue to have these protests that shut down such an important area of a major city,' she told reporters. In her determination declining to prohibit the march, Justice Belinda Rigg said the bridge would have been closed to traffic regardless of whether the protest was authorised or not. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said demonstrations were an important part of democracy and highlighted the peaceful nature of the Sydney march. 'Australians want people to stop killing each other, they want peace and security ... they don't want conflict brought here,' he said. Minns has faced some internal dissent from other Labor MPs over protest legislation. NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson has also flagged plans to seek the repeal of laws limiting protest, first introduced by the previous coalition government but expanded under Labor. Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees, defendant of the court action NSW Police took in an unsuccessful attempt to have the demonstration ruled unlawful, says nationwide protests are being planned for August 24. 'We want to build on this massive momentum we have now,' he told reporters. Despite concerns of regular marches across the bridge, Lees said the group has no plans for a repeat crossing any time soon and accused the premier of having an anti-protest agenda. 'His stance is pretty clear and he's passed a raft of anti-protest legislation already,' Lees said. 'We're going to have to keep fighting for our rights to demonstrate.'

Sky News AU
5 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Gareth Ward faces historic expulsion from NSW Parliament after rape conviction, with vote expected Wednesday as legal challenge looms
Convicted MP Gareth Ward is facing the prospect of being expelled from the NSW Parliament, with the Labor government set to move a formal motion this week following his recent conviction for multiple sexual offences. Ward, an independent member for Kiama, was found guilty in July of three counts of assault with act of indecency against an 18-year-old man in 2013, and one count of sexual intercourse without consent involving a 24-year-old man in 2015. He has been taken into custody on remand and is due to be sentenced on September 19. The 44-year-old has confirmed he intends to appeal the conviction, maintaining his innocence since being charged in 2022. 'I am absolutely shattered with the result of the trial and have taken the opportunity over the last few days to spend time with those I love following the verdict,' Ward said in a statement last week. 'I am taking advice about next steps, but I can confirm that I have provided instructions to my legal team to prepare an appeal at the earliest opportunity.' The NSW Constitution allows for the automatic removal of an MP only after sentencing of more than 12 months has been handed down and all appeals are exhausted. However, under Standing Order 254, Parliament may expel a member for conduct deemed 'unworthy' of the house, a power not used since 1917. The motion is expected to be moved in the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday and debated on Wednesday, following a delay after Ward's lawyers raised concerns about procedural fairness. Leader of the House Ron Hoenig confirmed that Ward had been invited to provide any statement or material for consideration ahead of the vote. While the full details of the legal correspondence have not been made public, it's understood Parliament will still proceed with the motion. Labor has confirmed it will back the expulsion. Premier Chris Minns said it was untenable for Ward to remain in Parliament following his conviction. 'It is completely ridiculous to be in a situation where someone has been not accused, not charged, but convicted of incredibly serious offences and stay as a member of parliament,' Mr Minns said on Monday. 'I haven't spoken to all of my colleagues, and I haven't spoken to the crossbench or the opposition about it, but it would seem ridiculous that he would continue as a member of parliament.' Opposition Leader Mark Speakman added: 'If he won't resign, parliament has to take every available legal step to remove him.' Despite widespread calls for his resignation, Ward has made no move to step down. 'The punitive measure is up to the NSW court. It's not up to parliament,' Mr Minns said. 'They'll make the decision about what punishment is applied, not us.' If expelled, a by-election will be triggered in the seat of Kiama, which Ward held as an independent at the 2023 state election despite a swing of more than 11 per cent against him. Ward left the Liberal Party after being charged in 2022. He was previously suspended from cabinet in 2021 when the allegations first surfaced.


West Australian
6 hours ago
- West Australian
Nationwide protests planned after pro-Palestine Harbour Bridge march
Protest laws could be repealed or expanded following a march across an iconic national landmark, as activists plan for more demonstrations. The pro-Palestine movement, boosted by a march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge which made news across the nation and around the world, hopes to build on its momentum. The march across the bridge and back in pouring rain came after opposition from police, and a court's overruling approval that has politicians worrying about the rare occurrence becoming common. Further protests are planned on August 24 in Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Adelaide and Perth with hopes more can be organised in other cities. Ahead of the state's parliament resuming on Tuesday, NSW Premier Chris Minns says his Government is examining whether a legal precedent has been set by the Supreme Court judgment that allowed the protest to proceed. 'No one should believe it's open season on the bridge,' he told reporters on Monday. But new laws might be needed to stop future bridge protests. Mr Minns was 'not ruling anything out' but said any legislation could not be rushed. Federal Opposition Leader Sussan Ley encouraged the premier to look at 'what might happen next'. 'Because we can't continue to have these protests that shut down such an important area of a major city,' she told reporters. In her determination declining to prohibit the march, Justice Belinda Rigg said the bridge would have been closed to traffic regardless of whether the protest was authorised or not. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said demonstrations were an important part of democracy and highlighted the peaceful nature of the Sydney march. 'Australians want people to stop killing each other, they want peace and security ... they don't want conflict brought here,' he said. Mr Minns has faced some internal dissent from other Labor MPs over protest legislation. NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson has also flagged plans to seek the repeal of laws limiting protest, first introduced by the previous coalition government but expanded under Labor. Palestine Action Group organiser Josh Lees, defendant of the court action NSW Police took in an unsuccessful attempt to have the demonstration ruled unlawful, says nationwide protests are being planned for August 24. 'We want to build on this massive momentum we have now,' he told reporters. Despite concerns of regular marches across the bridge, Mr Lees said the group has no plans for a repeat crossing any time soon and accused the premier of having an anti-protest agenda. 'His stance is pretty clear and he's passed a raft of anti-protest legislation already,' Mr Lees said. 'We're going to have to keep fighting for our rights to demonstrate.'