Confusion over timing of a military flyover in March preceded dangerous close call at Washington D.C. area airport, NTSB finds
CNN was the first to report on the close call.
The formation of four T-38 trainer jets was scheduled to fly over the airport at 3:21 p.m. on March 28 on the way to the neighboring cemetery under the control of the Potomac Consolidated Terminal Radar Approach Control, or TRACON.
Flights taking off from national airport were being managed by a different team of air traffic controllers located in the tower at the airport.
The airport was the site of a mid-air collision in January between a Blackhawk helicopter and an American Airlines regional jet which killed 67 people.
In March, about 40 minutes before the flyover was to happen, the TRACON called the tower to confirm they were aware of the incoming military jets, according to air traffic control audio recordings provided to the NTSB by the Federal Aviation Administration.
'The (controller in charge) acknowledged and stated that they were waiting for a 'stop the departures time,'' the NTSB said.
The planes would be over the 'target' at 3:21 and 'the stop time would be 17,' the TRACON responded, according to the report. 'If it changed, they would call back.'
At 3:02 p.m., about five seconds after a shift change briefing concluded, the T-38's asked the TRACON to change their timing and the controller provided a target time of 3:15.
However, 10 minutes later, the TRACON operations supervisor told the tower 'stop all departures hard time is now seventeen.'
The tower continued to clear planes to take off, including Delta flight 2983, which started down the runway at 3:15 p.m.
Twenty-two seconds later the TRACON supervisors called the tower and asked why they were allowing planes to depart.
It was too late to halt the Delta flight's takeoff, so controllers warned the military planes to look out and keep away from it.
Politicians have criticized the FAA for not having enough staff at the tower, and the NTSB preliminary report noted a staffing shortage during this incident.
'Due to staffing constraints' the tower operations supervisor had completed their shift at the time of the close call and a controller In charge was providing 'general oversight at the time of the event,' the report notes.
The NTSB did not place blame, or identify the cause of the problem, which usually comes in the final report about 18 months after an incident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bride Puts All the 'Plus-Size' Guests at Same Wedding Table, Claims She Was Being ‘Body Positive'
A woman on Reddit is wondering if she's wrong for feeling offended after being placed at the "Weight Watchers" table at her sister's wedding When she approached her sister about the table name, her sister told her stop being "sensitive" over the issue Instead of staying for the rest of the celebration, she made the decision to leave the wedding early, taking her gift with herA woman on Reddit is wondering if she's in the wrong for being offended that her sister sat all the plus-size wedding guests at one table. In a post on Reddit's r/AmIOverreacting forum, the 32-year-old woman explains that she was recently a bridesmaid in her 30-year-old sister's wedding. "I helped her plan stuff, I went to all the things, I paid for my dress/hair/makeup, the whole nine yards," she writes. "I didn't complain, I showed up early, I did what I was supposed to do because I wanted her day to go well." Though the reception seemed to go off without a hitch, the real drama happened when she got to the reception. Instead of being seated with the other people in the wedding party, she found her name at a table labeled "Weight Watchers." "I swear to god, the little name card says 'Weight Watchers.' Not like a cute table name or a funny inside joke…just 'Weight Watchers,'" she writes. "I thought maybe I misread it or something but nope. I look around and realize everyone at the table is plus-size. All of us. Every single person there." In her post, the woman notes that while her younger sister and brother are slim, she has put on weight in recent years, joking that after turning 25, "everything started sticking to me." "I pulled my sister aside and asked her what the hell that was about and she literally laughed," the poster continues. "She goes, 'Oh my god don't be so sensitive, I just thought it'd be more comfortable if people were with others like them. It's a body positive thing.' " The woman was "mortified" by the response, asking, "How is putting all the bigger people at one table 'body positive'?? It felt more like 'hide the fat guests in the corner so they don't ruin the aesthetic.' " Though she was openly hurt by her sister's body-shaming, instead of fussing further at the event, she just decided to leave the reception. "I didn't make a big scene, I just quietly grabbed my gift and dipped," she writes. She shares in an update that both her father and her mother reached out to her when they realized she'd disappeared. Though they both tried to "talk me into sucking it up and coming back," she stayed home. Her sister, however, has not addressed her disappearance from the wedding. "It's been 5 days and she hasn't reached out, nor have I, but she is on her honeymoon so I don't expect to hear from her for a few more days," she writes. "Maybe I'll be over it by then, but my feelings are legit so hurt right now." Now, she wonders if she may be "overreacting," or if she is right to feel that her sister's actions were "straight-up rude and humiliating." "Also I wore Spanx for 4 hours and I want compensation," she humorously concludes. Other Reddit users in the comments are decidedly on her side, noting that naming the table "Weight Watchers" was a blatantly rude decision. "That was incredibly rude and childish of her and you have every reason to be upset," one Reddit user wrote. "Weddings are supposed to be a time of joining together, not making people feel separated or singled out." "The 'oh my god don't be so sensitive' and 'be with others like them' says right there that she's not empathetic, dismissive and probably other things I can't think of right now," another commenter chimed in. "She knew exactly what she was doing…being a bully and disguising it as being 'progressive' with the body positivity buzz word." Read the original article on People
New York Times
33 minutes ago
- New York Times
Where Are the Men in Boys' Lives?
The importance of role models for girls seems irrefutable. Efforts since the 1990s to provide female role models have had great success opening doors for girls and young women, who now outpace boys in education, outnumber men in law and medical schools and excel in male-dominated fields like tech and politics. At the same time, boys have many fewer male role models in their daily lives. While men still fill most positions of power across American society, the people who interact with children are largely women. Occupations like pediatrics have switched to mostly being done by women, while those that were always female-dominated, like teaching, have become more so. Most of the Adults in Children's Lives Are Women The share of women and men in each role: Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey, Pew Research Center, University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging, Scouting America, National Congregations Study, American Board of Pediatrics By The New York Times At a crucial time in their lives, boys are increasingly cared for by women, especially the many boys whose fathers aren't a regular presence. This lack of male role models, say researchers, parents, young men and those who work with them, is contributing to their struggles in school and employment — and the overall feeling that they're adrift. Working with children has long been considered women's work, and as a result, has been undervalued, with low pay and a stigma against men doing it. The share of professional men in children's lives has decreased even more in recent decades. Over roughly the same period, single-mother households became more common. Mentorship groups say they struggle to find as many male volunteers as there are boys who need them. And as families have become more insular — participation in community groups and churches has declined, and children spend less time playing outside with neighbors — children get to know fewer adults. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
33 minutes ago
- New York Times
A Century Ago, Adolescents Weren't Fully Human
A parent could be forgiven for thinking that adolescents are primitive. They speak in monosyllables ('Food!'), if they speak at all. Their cognition can described as dim. ('Where are my shoes!? Oh, they're on my feet.') As a group, they seem to be not merely not-yet-mature-humans but not-yet-fully-humans-at-all — Homo habilis maybe, Neanderthals at best. Take heart in this impression. A century ago, when adolescent psychology first emerged as a field of study, that was exactly the thinking: Teenagers are literally not fully evolved; they are pre-human. The main proponent of this idea was G. Stanley Hall, a psychologist and educator at Clark University who in 1878 had received, from Harvard, the first doctorate in psychology awarded in the United States. At the time, adolescence was not just a mystery but a nonentity. For centuries leading up to the Industrial Age, young humans went directly from childhood into the work force and reproductive mode. The economy permitted no room for semi-productive adolescents, much less anything like teen culture. There had been echoes of teen angst. William Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' appeared in 1597. 'The Sorrows of Young Werther,' the 1774 novel by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, tells the story of a young man who, in pursuit of love, navigates melancholy, euphoria, suicidal ideation and, eventually, unrequited feelings that end in tragedy. The book was part of a late-18th-century German literary movement known as Sturm and Drang, which identified tumult and stress as defining characteristics of impulsive, romantic young people. Hall, born in Massachusetts in 1844, came of age amid major social and demographic change. With improvements in medicine, sanitation and living conditions, the life span of the average American was increasing, from roughly 40 in 1800 to near 50 by 1900. Progressive reformers sought to combat the ills of industrialization and called for compulsory elementary education; gradually, more working-class families opted for high school, because more learning could lead to better wages. These forces combined to wedge a new time period between childhood and adulthood. Hall was among the first scholars to try to name and explain it.'Up until Hall, there was an amorphous general notion that there was this period of life that was different,' said Dr. Laurence Steinberg, a psychologist at Temple University and expert on adolescence. 'What Hall did was connect the dots. He was the first person to put it all together.' He added, 'He had some ideas that were wacky and some that were brilliant.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
