House GOP clears key hurdle on Trump's big bill, pushing it closer to vote
The idea of quickly convening to for a vote on the more than 800-page bill after it passed the day before in the Senate was a risky gambit, one designed to meet Trump's demand for a holiday finish. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step of the way, often succeeding by the narrowest of margins — just one vote. Their slim 220-212 majority leaves little room for defections.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Several Republicans are balking at being asked to rubber-stamp the Senate version less than 24 hours after passage. A number of moderate Republicans from competitive districts have objected to the Senate bill's cuts to Medicaid, while conservatives have lambasted the legislation as straying from their fiscal goals.
Advertisement
'What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???' Trump railed in a post-midnight vote. He also warned starkly of political fallout from the delay 'COSTING YOU VOTES!!!'
It fell to Johnson and his team to convince them that the time for negotiations is over. They needed assistance from Trump to close the deal, and lawmakers headed to the White House for a two-hour session Wednesday to talk to the president about their concerns. Trump also worked the phones.
'The president's message was, 'We're on a roll,'' said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C. 'He wants to see this.'
Republicans are relying on their majority hold of Congress to push the package over a wall of unified Democratic opposition. No Democrats voted for bill in the Senate and none were expected to do so in the House.
'Hell no!' said House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries, flanked by fellow Democrats outside the Capitol.
In an early warning sign of Republican resistance, during a first procedural vote that also stalled out as GOP leadership waited for lawmakers who were delayed coming back to Washington and conducted closed-door negotiations with holdouts.
By nightfall, as pizzas and other dinners were arriving at the Capitol, the next steps were uncertain.
Trump pushes Republicans to do 'the right thing'
The bill would extend and make permanent various individual and business tax breaks from Trump's first term, plus temporarily add new ones he promised during the 2024 campaign. This includes allowing workers to deduct tips and overtime pay, and a $6,000 deduction for most older adults earning less than $75,000 a year. In all, the legislation contains about $4.5 trillion in tax cuts over 10 years.
The bill also provides about $350 billion for defense and Trump's immigration crackdown. Republicans partially pay for it all through less spending on Medicaid and food assistance. The Congressional Budget Office projects the bill will add about $3.3 trillion to the federal debt over the coming decade.
Advertisement
The House passed its version of the bill in May by a single vote, despite worries about spending cuts and the overall price tag. Now it's being asked to give final passage to a version that, in many respects, exacerbates those concerns. The Senate bill's projected impact on the nation's debt, for example, is significantly higher.
'Lets go Republicans and everyone else,' Trump said in a late evening post.
The high price of opposing Trump's bill
Johnson is intent on meeting Trump's timeline and betting that hesitant Republicans won't cross the president because of the heavy political price they would have to pay.
They need only look to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who announced his intention to vote against the legislation over the weekend. Soon, the president was calling for a primary challenger to the senator and criticizing him on social media. Tillis quickly announced he would not seek a third term.
One House Republican who has staked out opposition to the bill, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, is being targeted by Trump's well-funded political operation.
Democrats target vulnerable Republicans to join them in opposition
Flanked by nearly every member of his caucus, Democratic Leader Jeffries of New York delivered a pointed message: With all Democrats voting 'no,' they only need to flip four Republicans to prevent the bill from passing.
Jeffries invoked the 'courage' of the late Sen. John McCain giving a thumbs-down to the GOP effort to 'repeal and replace' the Affordable Care Act, and singled out Republicans from districts expected to be highly competitive in 2026, including two from Pennsylvania.
Advertisement
'Why would Rob Bresnahan vote for this bill? Why would Scott Perry vote for this bill?' Jeffries asked.
Democrats have described the bill in dire terms, warning that Medicaid cuts would result in lives lost and food stamp cuts would be 'literally ripping the food out of the mouths of children, veterans and seniors,' Jeffries said Monday.
Republicans say they are trying to right-size the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse.
The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and applies existing work requirements in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to more beneficiaries. States will also pick up more of the cost for food benefits.
The driving force behind the bill, however, is the tax cuts. Many expire at the end of this year if Congress doesn't act.
The Tax Policy Center, which provides nonpartisan analysis of tax and budget policy, projected the bill would result next year in a $150 tax break for the lowest quintile of Americans, a $1,750 tax cut for the middle quintile and a $10,950 tax cut for the top quintile. That's compared with what they would face if the 2017 tax cuts expired.
Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Matt Brown contributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
19 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump says tariff letters to 12 countries signed, going out Monday
U.S. President Donald Trump said he had signed letters to 12 countries outlining the various tariff levels they would face on goods they export to the United States, with the "take it or leave it" offers to be sent out on Monday. Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he traveled to New Jersey, declined to name the countries involved, saying that would be made public on Monday. Trump had earlier on Thursday told reporters that he expected a first batch of letters to go out on Friday, a national holiday in the United States, though the date has now shifted. In a global trade war that has upended financial markets and set off a scramble among policymakers to guard their economies, Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some ranging as high as 50%. However, all but the 10% base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That period ends on July 9, although Trump early on Friday said the tariffs could be even higher — ranging up to 70% — with most set to go into effect August 1. "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump said, when asked about his plans on the tariff front. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." Trump and his top aides initially said they would launch negotiations with scores of countries on tariff rates, but the U.S. president has soured on that process after repeated setbacks with major trading partners, including Japan and the European Union. He touched on that briefly late on Friday, telling reporters: "The letters are better ... much easier to send a letter." He did not address his prediction that some broader trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline. The shift in the White House's strategy reflects the challenges of completing trade agreements on everything from tariffs to non-tariff barriers such as bans on agricultural imports, and especially on an accelerated timeline. Most past trade agreements have taken years of negotiations to complete. The only trade agreements reached to date are with Britain, which reached a deal in May to keep a 10% rate and won preferential treatment for some sectors including autos and aircraft engines, and with Vietnam, cutting tariffs on many Vietnamese goods to 20% from his previously threatened 46%. Many U.S. products would be allowed to enter Vietnam duty free. A deal expected with India has failed to materialize, and EU diplomats on Friday said they have failed to achieve a breakthrough in trade negotiations with the Trump administration, and may now seek to extend the status quo to avoid tariff hikes.
Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Issued Warning on 2026 Midterms
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Republicans have been warned that the party's recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act could have dramatic repercussions in the 2026 midterm elections. Karl Rove, a longtime GOP strategist, said on Fox News's America's Newsroom: "I think it'll have a huge impact on 2026, because, remember, as these changes, particularly the Medicaid changes come into effect, they're going to have, people are going to be losing their coverage." Why It Matters President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, a taxation and spending package, narrowly passed the House of Representatives on Thursday by 218 votes against 214, having been approved by the Senate earlier in the week thanks to vice president JD Vance's tiebreaking vote. Trump signed the bill into law on Friday. The flagship legislation contains an array of tax and spending measures. Tax cuts Trump introduced in 2017 would be made permanent, while state and local tax deductions would increase from $10,000 to $40,000—primarily benefiting those living in high-tax states. The bill also includes additional funding for border security and the military and cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. It also raises the national debt ceiling and the Congressional Budget Office projects it will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt. What To Know Republicans advanced sweeping policy changes with the bill, imposing 80-hour-per-month work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients and introducing stricter eligibility checks. The legislation will reduce federal funding for Medicaid and food assistance, which is likely to result in millions losing coverage. Overall, Rove backed the legislation, commenting: "The able-bodied—think about it, there was an interesting study done of able-bodied people on Medicaid, and … you know what their No. 1 activity was if they weren't working? It was watching television. And No. 2 was playing online games." The GOP strategist praised work requirements but cautioned Republican leaders that "the work is just beginning," urging continued advocacy to justify these changes to voters. Rove said: "Medicaid was meant for poor seniors, for children in poor families, and for the disabled, and we should not be paying for health care for people who are able-bodied, and can work, and are refusing to work. This is why they got to go on the offense. But yeah, it's going to be a big impact." Meanwhile, Democrats and critics warn the cuts could energize opposition and threaten Republican lawmakers' control of Congress in closely divided districts. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek Gianno Caldwell, a conservative commentator and Fox News contributor, said: "BBB [Big Beautiful Bill] is what the American people have been demanding for decades. Putting the American People First, less taxes, support of the working and middle classes and cutting taxes for every American. Trump kept his promise and the American people won." Mark Shanahan, an American politics expert who teaches at the University of Surrey in the U.K., told Newsweek: "The cuts to America's safety net may bite hardest. While the tightening of the rules around SNAP won't come into play until 2028, Democrats have the chance to weaponize the changes in Medicaid around work requirements, six-month reenrolments, and, especially, the cut in provider tax. "At an individual level, millions of poorer Americans—many firmly in the MAGA camp—will see their benefits cut, while, at community level, we're likely to see a slew of rural hospital closures. There are many more Americans on Medicaid than there are billionaires, and this bill skews heavily against the poor. The White House may have calculated that these people don't vote anyway, but history says Americans vote on how healthy their wallet feels. By November 2026, for many, their wallets may be on life support." File photo: President Donald Trump speaks to journalists aboard Air Force One on July 4, 2025. File photo: President Donald Trump speaks to journalists aboard Air Force One on July 4, 2025. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/GETTY Dafydd Townley, a U.S. focused political scientist at the University of Portsmouth in southern England, told Newsweek: "The Big Beautiful Bill could prove costly to the Republican Party if the promised tax cut benefits are not felt universally. Concerns over Medicaid and the closure of rural hospitals are also unlikely to be welcomed but Republicans in close-fought districts. While there is likely to be some pushback against the incumbent party, the Republicans have a tiny majority in the House and will be determined to minimize this. If the House does flip to the Democrats in 2028, there will undoubtedly be two years of political stalemate as it's unlikely there will be any bipartisan collaboration, much like the last two years of the first Trump administration." Matt Terrill, a managing partner at consultancy firm Firehouse Strategies, told Newsweek: "This will be an asset to President Donald Trump and Republicans given this is the president delivering on the promises he made on the campaign trail—from tax cuts, to border security, etc., and those who voted for the president and congressional Republicans expected them to deliver on these core campaign promises. "In addition, this bill, particularly the tax cuts component, was crucial with respect to providing the president the ability to execute his economic agenda. Without this bill, he would not have been able to do so, and the upcoming midterm elections will primarily be about the economy. "However, for this to be a sustained win for the White House and for the GOP, particularly heading into the midterm elections, it comes down to where the economy will be over the next few months. Heading into the midterms, if the economy is strong, this bill will not just be a micro win but a macro win as well." What Happens Next The next midterm elections are scheduled to take place on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Currently, the Republicans have a narrow majority in both the Senate and House and losing either would make it significantly more difficult to pass President Donald Trump's policy agenda.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How long will you wait for Social Security help? Why it's anybody's guess.
Members of Congress and advocates say the Social Security Administration is providing the public with misleading information about how long it will take to resolve their problems. Over the last several weeks, the agency has stopped making public 34 real-time performance metrics about things like how long they will have to wait to reach a live person on the phone, and how long applications for new senior benefits or social security benefits take to be approved. The metrics have been used for years to show how time-consuming it can be to reach a live person at certain locations or through the national 1-800 number, and as an accountability measure for the agency. Instead the webpage now emphasizes how quickly problems can be resolved online, and says the "average speed of answer," which excludes callback wait time, is 19.2 minutes. USA TODAY reporters called Social Security's 1-800 line multiple times over several days and found the wait times to be consistently over an hour. Multiple times they did not reach a live person before the line disconnected with no warning. Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano told members of Congress June 25 that three out of four people who call that 1-800 number use a call-back feature so they are not waiting on the phone. He said he took the wait time metric off the website because he thought it kept people from calling. "If you show that you got an hour and a half wait time, well people are going to be discouraged and not call," he said. When California Rep. Judy Chu asked him to reinstate the metrics so members of Congress and the public can have an accurate barometer of the agency's performance, Bisignano avoided answering the question until Chu's time to ask questions expired. "How can you know how the Social Security Administration is doing with regard to answering calls or processing benefit applications unless you have these metrics? You have to compare them over time so it is shocking that they would just remove that data if they are so confident about all of these metrics that he was talking about," Chu told USA TODAY after the hearing. Social Security staffing was already at a ten-year low when President Donald Trump took office in January. Meanwhile, the number of new applicants has skyrocketed as Baby Boomers retire. That meant wait times to reach employees by phone, email or in person were already high when the Trump administration began to slash staff amidst efforts to downsize government. In February, the agency announced plans to cut 7,000 of the agency's 57,000 employees ‒ more than 10% of staff ‒ in response to President Trump's executive orders. At least 3,000 employees have already accepted buyout agreements. Average wait times to reach a live person by crept up to 90 minutes by early May. A May 22 screenshot of the Social Security website's live metrics, preserved by the Internet Archive, shows that call wait time was 1 hour and 46 minutes, and call back wait time was 1 hour and 44 minutes. It also showed the number of people on hold and current number waiting for a call back. Along with the 1-800 wait time information, the Social Security metrics page also included processing time for retirement, survivor, and Medicare benefits. For disability benefit applicants, which can take more than a year to get a decision, there was information about processing time, reconsideration time, and appeals adjudication time. The average speed of answer was shown as 20.3 minutes, based on an average of monthly data from the last year. That speed is similar to data the agency previously made public. Then, on June 6 the comprehensive dashboard showing live metrics was removed from the Social Security Administration's website, showing as 'under maintenance' until June 16. When the dashboard page went back up on June 16, it no longer included the live call wait time data or information on the number of people on hold or waiting for a call back, instead just listing the average speed of answer excluding call-back wait time as 19.2 minutes over the last year. "We are updating our performance metrics to reflect the real-life experiences of the people we serve and highlight the fastest ways our customers can get service," Social Security spokesperson Stephen McGraw said in a statement to USA TODAY. "It is critical that the agency measures what matters most to improve customer service while providing all Americans the information they need to select the service channel that works best for them." Concerned that the information now available on the website didn't match what her staff was hearing from constituents, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren's staff began conducting its own test of the 1-800 number, making hourly phone calls from June 12 through June 20. Warren leads Senate Democrat's Social Security War Room, which seeks to draw attention to changes the Trump administration is making to Social Security. In a letter Warren sent to Bisignano late on June 25, she called the results of her office survey "deeply troubling." Compared to the number available online, wait times averaged nearly an hour and 45 minutes and often exceeded three hours. Data from the office survey showed that in 50 calls, more than 50% were never answered by a human. The majority ended when the caller was placed on hold and then the call dropped. Of calls that were answered, 32% had wait times exceeding two hours. The average wait time was 102 minutes. "These delays are unacceptable ‒ and made even worse by your misleading claims that service has actually improved under your watch," she wrote in her letter, shared first with USA TODAY. "Service disruptions and barriers make it harder for beneficiaries to receive their Social Security benefits ‒ payments which are the primary source of income for more than half of America's seniors." More: Social security employees warn of delays: What the new priorities means for your benefits Warren accused Bisignano of lying about improving wait times at the agency in a separate statement to USA TODAY. "Donald Trump and DOGE (the Department of Government Efficiency) took a chainsaw to Social Security, leaving Americans waiting hours just to get help ‒ and that's if their call is answered at all. Instead of owning that failure, Commissioner Bisignano and his team are trying to cover it up," she said. Taking data offline makes it harder for Congress and Americans to know what the agency is doing, said Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, an advocacy group that wants to expand the agency. The information that is now on the website is an "apples to oranges" comparison to what was previously available, she said. Along with the call wait time, there is less detail on how long it will take for new applications to be processed and for disability claims to be appealed, and less about how wait times vary geographically, she said. There is "zero" evidence that wait times have suddenly gone down, she said. "It would defy logic for it to get easier given how they've hollowed out the agency, every part of the agency." Altman said the agency's lack of transparency about wait times raises questions about other information they are making public. And, if the website says the average hold is 19.2 minutes, but they are on the phone for much longer, it is hard for Americans to tell how widespread the problem is, Altman said. "The American people are getting frustrated, but they don't know if it is just happening to them," she said. More: Social Security wait times were already long under Biden. They're even longer under Trump. Jen Burdick, supervising attorney at Community Legal Services of Philadelphia, said they haven't seen a reduction in call times. "Social Security attorneys and paralegals from our office call SSA dozens of times every day. We are uniformly finding that we can't get placed into the queue, either because of system outages, phone disconnects, or AI chatbot issues. When we do get put into the queue, wait times seem to be up from last year ‒ sometimes more than an hour. More importantly, we're having a hard time resolving issues because of SSA training issues when we do reach staff," she told USA TODAY. We want to hear from people affected by or who have knowledge of the Trump administration's efforts to reshape the government, including actions by DOGE. Know something others should? Reach out at swire@ or Signal at sarahdwire.71 This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: How long will you wait for Social Security help? Anybody's guess.
