OpenAI CEO Sam Altman asks users not to trust ChatGPT ‘much', says ‘It should be…'
OpenAI
CEO
Sam Altman
recently warned against the trust users place in the company's AI chatbot, ChatGPT. Speaking at the inaugural episode of OpenAI's official podcast, Altman said that he finds it 'interesting' when people put 'high degree of trust' in ChatGPT. Noting that AI is infallible and can produce misleading or false content, he said that it should not be trusted much. 'People have a very high degree of trust in
ChatGPT
, which is interesting, because AI hallucinates. It should be the tech that you don't trust that much,' Altman said about OpenAI's own ChatGPT.
During the podcast, Altman also acknowledged that while ChatGPT continues to evolve with new features, the technology still has notable limitations that need to be addressed with honesty and transparency. Speaking about recent updates—including persistent memory and a potential ad-supported model—Altman noted that such advancements have raised fresh privacy concerns.
OpenAI CEO on legal battle on copyright issues
Altman's remarks come at a time when OpenAI is also facing legal challenges from media outlets, including The New York Times, over content use and copyright issues.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy
IC Markets
Tìm hiểu thêm
Undo
In response to these concerns, Altman emphasized the company's commitment to openness. 'We need to be honest about that,' he said, referring to the current reliability of the technology. 'It's not super reliable,' he conceded.
Sam Altman's u-turn on AI
Recently, Altman dramatically reversed his position on AI hardware requirements. He previously stated that the AI revolution wouldn't require new hardware. Taking a u-turn from his previous stance, Altman now claims that "current computers were designed for a world without AI" and suggests users will need new devices as artificial intelligence becomes more prevalent.
Speaking on his brother Jack Altman's podcast, Sam declared that computers, software, and hardware "were designed for a world without AI," indicating that user needs are changing rapidly in an AI-driven landscape. He envisions future systems that are "way more aware of their environment" and have "more context in your life," moving beyond traditional typing and screen-based interactions.
5 Features Android borrowed From iPhone!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
23 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Apple considers using Anthropic or OpenAI to power Siri in major shift
Apple Inc. is considering using artificial intelligence technology from Anthropic PBC or OpenAI to power a new version of Siri, sidelining its own in-house models in a potentially blockbuster move aimed at turning around its flailing AI effort. The iPhone maker has talked with both companies about using their large language models for Siri, according to people familiar with the discussions. It has asked them to train versions of their models that could run on Apple's cloud infrastructure for testing, said the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. If Apple ultimately moves forward, it would represent a monumental reversal. The company currently powers most of its AI features with homegrown technology that it calls Apple Foundation Models and had been planning a new version of its voice assistant that runs on that technology for 2026. Apple's investigation into third-party models is at an early stage, and the company hasn't made a final decision on using them, the people said. A competing project internally dubbed LLM Siri that uses in-house models remains in active development. Making a change — which is under discussion for next year — could allow Cupertino, California-based Apple to offer Siri features on par with AI assistants on Android phones, helping the company shed its reputation as an AI laggard. Representatives for Apple, Anthropic and OpenAI declined to comment. Shares of Apple closed up over 2 per cent after Bloomberg reported on the deliberations. Siri Struggles The project to evaluate external models was started by Siri chief Mike Rockwell and software engineering head Craig Federighi. They were given oversight of Siri after the duties were removed from the command of John Giannandrea, the company's AI chief. He was sidelined in the wake of a tepid response to Apple Intelligence and Siri feature delays. Rockwell, who previously launched the Vision Pro headset, assumed the Siri engineering role in March. After taking over, he instructed his new group to assess whether Siri would do a better job handling queries using Apple's AI models or third-party technology, including Claude, ChatGPT and Alphabet Inc.'s Google Gemini. After multiple rounds of testing, Rockwell and other executives concluded that Anthropic's technology is most promising for Siri's needs, the people said. That led Adrian Perica, the company's vice president of corporate development, to start discussions with Anthropic about using Claude, the people said. The Siri assistant — originally released in 2011 — has fallen behind popular AI chatbots, and Apple's attempts to upgrade the software have been stymied by engineering snags and delays. A year ago, Apple unveiled new Siri capabilities, including ones that would let it tap into users' personal data and analyze on-screen content to better fulfill queries. The company also demonstrated technology that would let Siri more precisely control apps and features across Apple devices. The enhancements were far from ready. Apple initially announced plans for an early 2025 release but ultimately delayed the launch indefinitely. They are now planned for next spring, Bloomberg News has reported. AI Uncertainty People with knowledge of Apple's AI team say it is operating with a high degree of uncertainty and a lack of clarity, with executives still poring over a number of possible directions. Apple has already approved a multibillion dollar budget for 2026 for running its own models via the cloud but its plans for beyond that remain murky. Still, Federighi, Rockwell and other executives have grown increasingly open to the idea that embracing outside technology is the key to a near-term turnaround. They don't see the need for Apple to rely on its own models — which they currently consider inferior — when it can partner with third parties instead, according to the people. Licensing third-party AI would mirror an approach taken by Samsung Electronics Co. While the company brands its features under the Galaxy AI umbrella, many of its features are actually based on Gemini. Anthropic, for its part, is already used by Inc. to help power the new Alexa+. In the future, if its own technology improves, the executives believe Apple should have ownership of AI models given their increasing importance to how products operate. The company is working on a series of projects, including a tabletop robot and glasses that will make heavy use of AI. Apple has also recently considered acquiring Perplexity in order to help bolster its AI work, Bloomberg has reported. It also briefly held discussions with Thinking Machines Lab, the AI startup founded by former OpenAI Chief Technology Officer Mira Murati. Souring Morale Apple's models are developed by a roughly 100-person team run by Ruoming Pang, an Apple distinguished engineer who joined from Google in 2021 to lead this work. He reports to Daphne Luong, a senior director in charge of AI research. Luong is one of Giannandrea's top lieutenants, and the foundation models team is one of the few significant AI groups still reporting to Giannandrea. Even in that area, Federighi and Rockwell have taken a larger role. Regardless of the path it takes, the proposed shift has weighed on the team, which has some of the AI industry's most in-demand talent. Some members have signaled internally that they are unhappy that the company is considering technology from a third-party, creating the perception that they are to blame, at least partially, for the company's AI shortcomings. They've said that they could leave for multimillion-dollar packages being floated by Meta Platforms Inc. and OpenAI. Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, has been offering some engineers annual pay packages between $10 million and $40 million — or even more — to join its new Superintelligence Labs group, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Apple is known, in many cases, to pay its AI engineers half — or even less — than what they can get on the open market. One of Apple's most senior large language model researchers, Tom Gunter, left last week. He had worked at Apple for about eight years, and some colleagues see him as difficult to replace given his unique skillset and the willingness of Apple's competitors to pay exponentially more for talent. Apple this month also nearly lost the team behind MLX, its key open-source system for developing machine learning models on the latest Apple chips. After the engineers threatened to leave, Apple made counteroffers to retain them — and they're staying for now. Anthropic and OpenAI Discussions In its discussions with both Anthropic and OpenAI, the iPhone maker requested a custom version of Claude and ChatGPT that could run on Apple's Private Cloud Compute servers — infrastructure based on high-end Mac chips that the company currently uses to operate its more sophisticated in-house models. Apple believes that running the models on its own chips housed in Apple-controlled cloud servers — rather than relying on third-party infrastructure — will better safeguard user privacy. The company has already internally tested the feasibility of the idea. Other Apple Intelligence features are powered by AI models that reside on consumers' devices. These models — slower and less powerful than cloud-based versions — are used for tasks like summarizing short emails and creating Genmojis. Apple is opening up the on-device models to third-party developers later this year, letting app makers create AI features based on its technology. The company hasn't announced plans to give apps access to the cloud models. One reason for that is the cloud servers don't yet have the capacity to handle a flood of new third-party features. The company isn't currently working on moving away from its in-house models for on-device or developer use cases. Still, there are fears among engineers on the foundation models team that moving to a third-party for Siri could portend a move for other features as well in the future. Last year, OpenAI offered to train on-device models for Apple, but the iPhone maker was not interested. Since December 2024, Apple has been using OpenAI to handle some features. In addition to responding to world knowledge queries in Siri, ChatGPT can write blocks of text in the Writing Tools feature. Later this year, in iOS 26, there will be a ChatGPT option for image generation and on-screen image analysis. While discussing a potential arrangement, Apple and Anthropic have disagreed over preliminary financial terms, according to the people. The AI startup is seeking a multibillion-dollar annual fee that increases sharply each year. The struggle to reach a deal has left Apple contemplating working with OpenAI or others if it moves forward with the third-party plan, they said. Management Shifts If Apple does strike an agreement, the influence of Giannandrea, who joined Apple from Google in 2018 and is a proponent of in-house large language model development, would continue to shrink. In addition to losing Siri, Giannandrea was stripped of responsibility over Apple's robotics unit. And, in previously unreported moves, the company's Core ML and App Intents teams — groups responsible for frameworks that let developers integrate AI into their apps — were shifted to Federighi's software engineering organization. Apple's foundation models team had also been building large language models to help employees and external developers write code in Xcode, its programming software. The company killed the project — announced last year as Swift Assist — about a month ago. Instead, Apple later this year is rolling out a new Xcode that can tap into third-party programming models. App developers can choose from ChatGPT or Claude.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Canada U-turn on US tech taxes leaves Europe in the lurch
Canada dropping tax on US tech giants under pressure from US President Donald Trump is fuelling concern about the future of such levies in other countries, particularly in Europe. The first payment for Canada's Digital Services Tax (DST) was supposed to be due Monday. The tax, which was passed into law last year by the Trudeau govt, was meant to charge 3% of the digital services revenue a firm makes from Canadian users above $14.6 million in a calendar year. After Trump on Friday said he was ending all trade discussions with Canada, its finance minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said in a social media post late Sunday: "Rescinding the DST will allow the negotiations to make vital progress and reinforce our work to create jobs and build prosperity for all Canadians." C by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo urrently, about half of all European OECD countries have either announced, proposed, or implemented a digital services tax pending global action, said the Tax Foundation, a think tank which supports the introduction of such taxes. But the future of such measures is unclear after the Group of Seven nations agreed Saturday to exempt US multinational companies from a global minimum tax imposed by other countries. The US and fellow G7 nations signed off on an agreement aimed at averting a global tax war, by creating a "side-by-side" system that would exempt US companies from some elements of an existing global agreement. Reacting to the developments, Nobel winning economist Joseph Stiglitz said: "This is about more than trade - it's about whether democratically elected govts can regulate and tax powerful corporations or whether tech billionaires can dictate policy through political proxies."
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Oil edges down on expectations of more OPEC+ supply, tariff fears
Oil prices edged down on Tuesday, weighed by expectations of an OPEC+ output hike in August and concerns of an economic slowdown driven by prospects of higher U.S. tariffs. Brent crude futures for September delivery fell 16 cents, or 0.24%, to $66.58 a barrel by 0000 GMT. U.S. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Huge Discounts on Bank-Seized Vehicles in the Philippines! SUV Deals | Search Ads Search Now Undo West Texas Intermediate crude declined 20 cents, or 0.31%, to $64.91 a barrel. "The market is now concerned that the OPEC+ alliance will continue with its accelerated rate of output increases," ANZ senior commodity strategist Daniel Hynes said in a note. Four OPEC+ sources told Reuters last week that the group plans to raise output by 411,000 barrels per day in August, following similar hikes in May, June, and July. Live Events If approved, this would bring OPEC+'s total supply increase for the year to 1.78 million bpd, equivalent to more than 1.5% of global oil demand . OPEC and its allies including Russia, together known as OPEC+, will meet on July 6. Uncertainty about U.S. tariffs and their impact on global growth also kept a lid on oil prices. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that countries could be notified of sharply higher tariffs despite good-faith negotiations as a July 9 deadline approaches, when tariff rates are scheduled to revert from a temporary 10% level to President Donald Trump's suspended rates of 11% to 50% announced on April 2. Morgan Stanley expects Brent futures to retrace to around $60 by early next year, with the market being well supplied and geopolitical risk abating following the Israel-Iran de-escalation. It expects an oversupply of 1.3 million bpd in 2026. A 12-day war that started with Israel targeting Iran's nuclear facilities on June 13 pushed up Brent prices. They surged above $80 a barrel after the U.S. bombed Iran's nuclear facilities and then slumped to $67 after Trump announced an Iran-Israel ceasefire.
