Parliament faces budget impasse as DA threatens to vote against ministers
Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers
Parliament is at a crossroads on the passing of the budget for 2025/26 just six days before the National Assembly adopts the Appropriations Bill.
This takes place as the second biggest party in the Government of National Unity (GNU), the DA, has threatened not to vote for the budget votes of those ministers they deem are compromised and should be axed from the Cabinet.
The Appropriation Standing Committee is set to adopt its report today ahead of the passing of the bill by the National Assembly on Wednesday, before the bill is sent to the National Council of Provinces for concurrence.
Briefing the Programme Committee on Thursday, National Assembly secretary Masibulele Xaso took the chief whips of political parties on the four steps to be followed when the bill is passed next week.
Xaso said once the Standing Committee on Appropriation has submitted its report on the bill, the House will first consider that report and thereafter the bill.
'After the report is considered, we then move to the First Reading of the bill. After the First Reading of the bill, we'll do the departmental votes and after the departmental votes, we then do the schedule.'
Xaso also said if the National Assembly rejected the First Reading of the bill, it rejected the bill.
'The House may consider to pass, amend, or reject any legislation before it. Any legislation means any legislation. So in this context, on the first reading of the appropriation book, the process ends there,' he said.
Xaso stated that when the House passed the First Reading of the bill, MPs will consider the departmental votes, one by one.
Where there was no agreement on all the votes, the bill will be recommitted to the committee for amendments.
'The vote, together with the bill, must then be referred to the Standing Committee on Appropriation for further processing. So in that event, we will then not proceed to take a decision on the schedule. We will not proceed to take a decision on the Second Reading of the bill.'
He also said should the Second Reading of the bill not be agreed, and then the bill will be rejected.
'It won't go back to the committee because the bill would be dead in the parliamentary process. It would mean the bill must be reintroduced into the system,' Xaso said.
EFF MP Hlengiwe Mkhaliphi enquired whether there will be fresh elections should the bill not be passed.
'If we take the bill to the committee to process, the fact of the matter is that it will mean that we as Parliament failed to pass the budget. Does that mean, if Parliament fails to budget, we must go to elections?' Mkhaliphi asked.
In response, Xaso said the House must proceed with First Reading of the bill and once it was rejected, the process ended there.
'The bill, at that level, must go to committee to look at the nature of amendments and implications and come to the House with a report,' added Xaso.
MK Party MP Visvin Reddy said the law states that if the budget can't be passed, there should be fresh elections.
'That is what the law says. Why try to second guess the law. It is like trying to fit a puzzle where it can't fit.'
'If the law says we can't pass the budget so be it let's go for fresh elections.'
But, national Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza said there were rules on how to run the parliamentary business.
'We need to look our rules as the National Assembly,' Didiza said.
MPs heard that the budget must be passed within four months in the new financial year, which is the end of July.
Parliamentary legal advisor Frank Jenkins indicated that the Public Finance Management Act sets out how government can spend prior to budget being approved.
Jenkins said in the first four months the government can spend 45% of budget equivalent to previous year budget and thereafter 10% each month.
'If funds are used prior to budget, the funds are used for existing programmes. Money is going to be deducted when the budget is finally passed.'
However, Jenkins said the implied motion of no confidence, when a budget was not passed eliciting elections, was not applicable in South Africa as the constitution provided for dissolution of Parliament when its term expired and by resolution after three years after the elections.
'The Constitution does not envisage in the first or second year after the elections,' Jenkins said.
Cape Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
We're not responsible for SANDF budget cuts: National Treasury
The National Treasury says it is not responsible for any budget challenges experienced by the South African National Defence Force (SANDF). The Treasury said it was concerned by remarks made by the head of the navy, Adm Monde Lobese, who accused it of compromising national security by not providing the defence force with resources. Lobese made the comments during a joint standing committee on defence meeting in parliament on Friday. In response, the Treasury said in line with the constitution, withdrawing funds from the National Revenue Fund can only be done through an act of parliament. 'Final approval is by parliament and the National Treasury is then entrusted to ensure the implementation of parliament's decisions. It is therefore incorrect to suggest the National Treasury is responsible for budget challenges experienced by the SANDF,' it said. Lobese told the committee it needs to take a stand against what he called the 'sabotage' of the defence force due to years of defunding. 'National Treasury for a change needs to be patriotic in how they address the funding of the SANDF. National Treasury can't be allowed to be a super department,' he said. However, the Treasury said in terms of the Public Finance Management Act, the Treasury is responsible for managing the budget process and exercising control over the implementation of the national budget. According to the Treasury, the 2025/2026 proposed defence allocation of R57.2bn in the Appropriation Bill was informed by the government's broader fiscal strategy, which aimed to stabilise public finances, reduce debt service costs and create space to invest in critical infrastructure and frontline services in support of higher growth. 'In this constrained fiscal environment, the department of defence has been allocated an additional R4.3bn over the 2025 medium-term expenditure framework to support priority needs — most notably, the orderly and safe withdrawal of troops and mission equipment from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), with other essential operational requirements.' TimesLIVE previously reported that defence and military veterans minister Angie Motshekga said better funding could have allowed the defence force to handle the repatriation of troops deployed to the eastern DRC as part of the Sadc Mission in the DRC, avoiding trauma and logistical chaos.
eNCA
2 days ago
- eNCA
Bid to bring back pesticide in France sparks unprecedented petition
PARIS - A new law in France allowing the reintroduction of a banned pesticide has sparked a massive response for a petition opposing it, which on Saturday had gathered more than 600,000 signatures. The so-called "Duplomb law" has stirred public anger for permitting a return of acetamiprid -- a chemical known to be toxic to pollinators such as bees and to ecosystems. It was adopted on July 8 but has not yet come into effect. The legislation, named after the conservative lawmaker who proposed it, was presented in parliament as a measure to "reduce constraints" on French farmers. But its move to bring back acetamiprid prompted a 23-year-old master's student to launch a petition against it which quickly snowballed, gathering support from many people, including actors and several leftwing lawmakers. The French parliament's official website showed it had accumulated more signatures than any other. At 8:30pm Saturday the counter had passed 620,000. The petition's author, Eleonore Pattery, who describes herself as "a future environmental health professional", called the new law a "scientific, ethical, environmental and public health aberration". "It represents a frontal attack on public health, biodiversity, the coherence of climate policies, food security, and common sense," she said. - A 'bee killer' - Acetamiprid has been banned in France since 2018, but remains legal within the European Union. The insecticide is particularly sought after by beet and hazelnut growers, who say they have no alternative against pests and face unfair competition. On the other hand, beekeepers have described the chemical as "a bee killer". Its effects on humans are also a source of concern but, in the absence of large-scale studies, its risks remain unclear. The petition calls for the "immediate repeal" of the law and a "citizen-led consultation involving health, agricultural, environmental and legal stakeholders". Petitions do not in themselves trigger a review or repeal of the legislation but unprecedented public support may prompt renewed parliamentary discussion on the matter. Under French rules, if a petition reaches 500,000 verified signatures, the National Assembly may choose to hold a public debate limited to the content of the petition itself. In late June, before the law's passage, several thousand demonstrators — including farmers, environmental organisations and scientists — rallied across France calling for the bill to be withdrawn.
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Parliament faces budget impasse as DA threatens to vote against ministers
The National Assembly Programme heard that individual budget votes of departments will have to be passed by the National Assembly next week otherwise the Appropriation Bill will be sent back to the standinng committee for further processing. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers Parliament is at a crossroads on the passing of the budget for 2025/26 just six days before the National Assembly adopts the Appropriations Bill. This takes place as the second biggest party in the Government of National Unity (GNU), the DA, has threatened not to vote for the budget votes of those ministers they deem are compromised and should be axed from the Cabinet. The Appropriation Standing Committee is set to adopt its report today ahead of the passing of the bill by the National Assembly on Wednesday, before the bill is sent to the National Council of Provinces for concurrence. Briefing the Programme Committee on Thursday, National Assembly secretary Masibulele Xaso took the chief whips of political parties on the four steps to be followed when the bill is passed next week. Xaso said once the Standing Committee on Appropriation has submitted its report on the bill, the House will first consider that report and thereafter the bill. 'After the report is considered, we then move to the First Reading of the bill. After the First Reading of the bill, we'll do the departmental votes and after the departmental votes, we then do the schedule.' Xaso also said if the National Assembly rejected the First Reading of the bill, it rejected the bill. 'The House may consider to pass, amend, or reject any legislation before it. Any legislation means any legislation. So in this context, on the first reading of the appropriation book, the process ends there,' he said. Xaso stated that when the House passed the First Reading of the bill, MPs will consider the departmental votes, one by one. Where there was no agreement on all the votes, the bill will be recommitted to the committee for amendments. 'The vote, together with the bill, must then be referred to the Standing Committee on Appropriation for further processing. So in that event, we will then not proceed to take a decision on the schedule. We will not proceed to take a decision on the Second Reading of the bill.' He also said should the Second Reading of the bill not be agreed, and then the bill will be rejected. 'It won't go back to the committee because the bill would be dead in the parliamentary process. It would mean the bill must be reintroduced into the system,' Xaso said. EFF MP Hlengiwe Mkhaliphi enquired whether there will be fresh elections should the bill not be passed. 'If we take the bill to the committee to process, the fact of the matter is that it will mean that we as Parliament failed to pass the budget. Does that mean, if Parliament fails to budget, we must go to elections?' Mkhaliphi asked. In response, Xaso said the House must proceed with First Reading of the bill and once it was rejected, the process ended there. 'The bill, at that level, must go to committee to look at the nature of amendments and implications and come to the House with a report,' added Xaso. MK Party MP Visvin Reddy said the law states that if the budget can't be passed, there should be fresh elections. 'That is what the law says. Why try to second guess the law. It is like trying to fit a puzzle where it can't fit.' 'If the law says we can't pass the budget so be it let's go for fresh elections.' But, national Assembly Speaker Thoko Didiza said there were rules on how to run the parliamentary business. 'We need to look our rules as the National Assembly,' Didiza said. MPs heard that the budget must be passed within four months in the new financial year, which is the end of July. Parliamentary legal advisor Frank Jenkins indicated that the Public Finance Management Act sets out how government can spend prior to budget being approved. Jenkins said in the first four months the government can spend 45% of budget equivalent to previous year budget and thereafter 10% each month. 'If funds are used prior to budget, the funds are used for existing programmes. Money is going to be deducted when the budget is finally passed.' However, Jenkins said the implied motion of no confidence, when a budget was not passed eliciting elections, was not applicable in South Africa as the constitution provided for dissolution of Parliament when its term expired and by resolution after three years after the elections. 'The Constitution does not envisage in the first or second year after the elections,' Jenkins said. Cape Times
