logo
Re-evaluating screen time in current education

Re-evaluating screen time in current education

Observer17-04-2025
As schools reopen for the new academic year, it is the right moment to critically reassess the role of screen time in modern education. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the Learning Management System (LMS) Moodle served as a lifeline, allowing students to access lessons, participate in virtual classes, and submit assignments amid school closures. Its role was indispensable in ensuring academic continuity during a global crisis.
However, with physical classrooms now fully operational, we must ask: Does Moodle still hold the same value, or has its continued overuse begun to erode the essence of quality education?
Moodle's utility during the pandemic is undeniable. Yet, its heavy reliance in face-to-face settings is raising concerns. In many cases, teachers continue to use it simply to upload notes, PowerPoint slides, and pre-recorded lectures, often at the expense of active teaching. This shift has transformed some classrooms into passive learning environments, where meaningful interaction, timely feedback, and real-time discussion are lost.
Before the digital surge, classrooms were hubs of vibrant activity - fostering collaboration, critical thinking, and hands-on experiences. Now, with increased dependence on independent study via screens, many students engage in surface-level learning, skimming digital content rather than deeply engaging with it. This lack of interaction has not only led to poor retention but also diminished students' enthusiasm and academic performance.
Another alarming trend is the decline in teacher involvement. Some educators now limit their role to uploading materials, sometimes just before exams, with minimal classroom engagement or support. This undermines the mentor-mentee dynamic that is crucial for both academic growth and personal development.
From a parent's perspective, the issue goes beyond academics. Prolonged screen time has been linked to physical problems like eye strain, sleep disruption, and reduced physical activity. Moreover, Moodle's online nature makes it easier for students to engage in dishonest practices during assessments, which threatens academic integrity and discourages independent thinking.
Parents also face the challenge of monitoring their children's Moodle usage. What appears to be academic engagement may in fact be a cover for browsing social media or playing online games. Platforms like Instagram have become a frequent distraction, leading to time mismanagement and poor academic habits - issues that can have long-term consequences.
While Moodle can still be a powerful supplemental tool, it should not replace traditional classroom dynamics. True education thrives in environments that blend structured teaching, engaging discussions, and personalised support - qualities that digital tools alone cannot replicate.
To restore this balance, schools must promote active teaching, limit unnecessary screen time, and encourage greater parental involvement.
In summary, while Moodle played a critical role during the pandemic, its excessive use in post-pandemic classrooms risks diminishing the essence of face-to-face learning. The way forward lies in using technology to complement - replace - educational experiences.
The writer is a lecturer of English
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global identity: Prospects and dangers
Global identity: Prospects and dangers

Observer

time5 days ago

  • Observer

Global identity: Prospects and dangers

The idea of a 'global identity' has recently emerged with the forces of globalisation, technological interconnectedness and mass migration propelling it. This concept suggests that beyond local, regional or national identities, individuals may begin to perceive themselves as part of a wider human community. While a global identity promises solidarity and collective action, it also raises dangers of cultural erasure, alienation and political backlash. At the individual level, adopting a global identity can expand one's perspectives. Exposure to diverse cultures, languages, and worldviews through travel, education, and digital interaction cultivates empathy and openness. For instance, a student collaborating with international peers on climate research develops a sense of shared responsibility transcending national borders. This cosmopolitan outlook enhances creativity, cross-cultural competence, and employability in global careers. Yet, it can simultaneously dilute the strength of local roots. Individuals may experience identity confusion as they feel alienated from their cultural heritage or excluded from their host communities if they are perceived as 'foreign.' Psychologically, the tension between local belonging and global aspirations can lead to what sociologists term 'rootlessness' or 'placelessness' which erodes a secure sense of self. At the community or cultural level, global identity fosters inclusivity and pluralism. Multicultural cities are living examples of how diverse communities coexist, exchange practices and create hybrid identities. This process can rejuvenate traditional cultures by integrating new ideas while preserving core values. For example, many indigenous activists use global platforms to amplify local environmental struggles to gain solidarity from international allies. However, the danger here lies in cultural homogenisation. Global media, commerce, and fashion often privilege Western or dominant narratives, while marginalising minority languages, indigenous knowledge systems and traditional art forms. The global market's preference for certain aesthetics and norms can lead to cultural erosion, where local traditions are commodified or lost entirely in the name of 'modernisation' and economic growth. At the national or political level, embracing a global identity facilitates international cooperation. Transnational challenges such as climate change, pandemics and cybersecurity threats require nations to prioritise shared interests over narrow nationalism. Global institutions like the UN or WHO thrive on the notion that humanity forms a single moral community with mutual obligations. The Covid-19 pandemic, for example, highlighted the need for global solidarity in vaccine distribution and research. Yet, the rise of global identity also triggers political dangers. Nationalist movements worldwide argue that globalism undermines sovereignty, economic security and cultural integrity. They even exploit these fears to frame global identity as a threat to national values. This backlash can result in xenophobia, protectionism and even violent conflict, as seen in anti-immigrant movements across Europe and the United States. At the civilisational or planetary level, the ideal of global identity offers humanity a chance to avert existential risks. For example, climate change mitigation requires humans to identify not merely as citizens of states, but as stewards of Earth. However, defining a singular global identity risks imposing monolithic moral or ideological frameworks. It may ignore power asymmetries, especially between developed and developing nations. This might lead to neocolonial governance structures where dominant powers dictate the terms of 'global' priorities. In fact, global identity is neither purely utopian nor dystopian. Its prospects lie in fostering peace, understanding and sustainable development by encouraging humans to see beyond artificial divides. On the other hand, its dangers lie in erasing differences, suppressing dissenting voices and exacerbating inequalities under the banner of 'unity.' Therefore, cultivating a balanced global identity requires critical awareness as it demands intercultural humility that respects local wisdom while recognising our interconnected fates. As the world becomes more interconnected, education systems, policymakers and global citizens must nurture identities that are simultaneously rooted and open — where one can proudly say 'I am Omani', 'I am African', or 'I am Chinese', while also saying 'I am human.' Only then can global identity fulfil its promise of building a world that is not merely connected, but also compassionate, just and resilient. Dr Omar Osman Jabak The author is with UTAS Rustaq

Philippines warns of health emergency as HIV cases soar
Philippines warns of health emergency as HIV cases soar

Observer

time03-06-2025

  • Observer

Philippines warns of health emergency as HIV cases soar

Philippine medical authorities on Tuesday warned of a looming "public health emergency" as HIV infections have soared this year, with young males especially hard-hit. On average, 57 new cases a day were tallied in the country of 117 million people over the first three months of 2025, a 50 percent jump from a year earlier, health department data shows. "We now have the highest number of new cases here in the Western Pacific," Health Secretary Ted Herbosa said in a video message released Tuesday. "What is frightening is, our youth make up many of the new cases," he said. "It would be in our interest to (declare) a public health emergency, a national emergency for HIV to mobilise the entire society, the whole of government to help us in this campaign to reduce the number of new HIV cases," Herbosa added. The health department said 95 percent of newly reported cases were male, with 33 percent aged 15-24 and 47 percent aged 25-34. The government did not explain the causes behind the surge, which it said had set back government attempts to hit global targets set by a United Nations campaign to end the AIDS epidemic by 2030. Under Philippine law, the president can declare a health emergency if an epidemic poses a threat to national security. The start of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 was the last time that was done. Just 55 percent of those living with HIV in the Philippines have been diagnosed, the health department said, while only 66 percent of those diagnosed are on life-saving antiretroviral therapy. Sexual contact remains the predominant mode of transmission, with the bulk of cases since 2007 attributed to men having sex with men. HIV cases have been on the rise in the Philippines since 2021, with 252,800 people estimated to be living with HIV in the country by the end of this year.

Re-evaluating screen time in current education
Re-evaluating screen time in current education

Observer

time17-04-2025

  • Observer

Re-evaluating screen time in current education

As schools reopen for the new academic year, it is the right moment to critically reassess the role of screen time in modern education. During the Covid-19 pandemic, the Learning Management System (LMS) Moodle served as a lifeline, allowing students to access lessons, participate in virtual classes, and submit assignments amid school closures. Its role was indispensable in ensuring academic continuity during a global crisis. However, with physical classrooms now fully operational, we must ask: Does Moodle still hold the same value, or has its continued overuse begun to erode the essence of quality education? Moodle's utility during the pandemic is undeniable. Yet, its heavy reliance in face-to-face settings is raising concerns. In many cases, teachers continue to use it simply to upload notes, PowerPoint slides, and pre-recorded lectures, often at the expense of active teaching. This shift has transformed some classrooms into passive learning environments, where meaningful interaction, timely feedback, and real-time discussion are lost. Before the digital surge, classrooms were hubs of vibrant activity - fostering collaboration, critical thinking, and hands-on experiences. Now, with increased dependence on independent study via screens, many students engage in surface-level learning, skimming digital content rather than deeply engaging with it. This lack of interaction has not only led to poor retention but also diminished students' enthusiasm and academic performance. Another alarming trend is the decline in teacher involvement. Some educators now limit their role to uploading materials, sometimes just before exams, with minimal classroom engagement or support. This undermines the mentor-mentee dynamic that is crucial for both academic growth and personal development. From a parent's perspective, the issue goes beyond academics. Prolonged screen time has been linked to physical problems like eye strain, sleep disruption, and reduced physical activity. Moreover, Moodle's online nature makes it easier for students to engage in dishonest practices during assessments, which threatens academic integrity and discourages independent thinking. Parents also face the challenge of monitoring their children's Moodle usage. What appears to be academic engagement may in fact be a cover for browsing social media or playing online games. Platforms like Instagram have become a frequent distraction, leading to time mismanagement and poor academic habits - issues that can have long-term consequences. While Moodle can still be a powerful supplemental tool, it should not replace traditional classroom dynamics. True education thrives in environments that blend structured teaching, engaging discussions, and personalised support - qualities that digital tools alone cannot replicate. To restore this balance, schools must promote active teaching, limit unnecessary screen time, and encourage greater parental involvement. In summary, while Moodle played a critical role during the pandemic, its excessive use in post-pandemic classrooms risks diminishing the essence of face-to-face learning. The way forward lies in using technology to complement - replace - educational experiences. The writer is a lecturer of English

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store