
Polyandry back in spotlight after brothers marry woman in Himachal: What law says
Is polyandry legally recognised? As far as the law is concerned, polyandry is not legally recognised in India. Under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — which governs marriages among Hindus — a valid marriage must be monogamous.Section 5 of the Act stipulates that "neither party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage." This makes bigamy or polyandry (having multiple husbands) legally invalid.In fact, bigamy is punishable under Section 82 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which criminalises marrying again during the lifetime of a spouse without legal divorce.Even the Special Marriage Act, a person cannot have more than one living spouse at the time of marriage.The Act states that at the time of the marriage, neither party has a spouse living, which means that if either person is already married to someone who is still alive, the new marriage is void under the Act.However, it is important to note that the Hindu Marriage Act does not apply to the members of any Scheduled Tribe, unless the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, otherwise directs.Under the Constitution, "Scheduled Tribes" refers to such tribes or tribal communities, or parts or groups within them, as are deemed under Article 342 to be Scheduled Tribes for the purposes of this Constitution.As far as cases like the present one are concerned, Indian personal law does allow for customary practices to be taken into account, especially in tribal communities.Section 13 of the Evidence Act provides for facts which are relevant when right or custom is in question, which basically allows parties to present evidence to establish customs, when those customs are legally in issue.Through judicial interpretation its also been evolved by courts that customs have to pass certain tests, including whether they are ancient, certain, reasonable, not opposed to public policy, morality, etc.Through judicial interpretation, it has also been established by the courts that customs must pass certain tests — including whether they are ancient, certain, reasonable, and not opposed to public policy or morality.Speaking to India Today TV, Advocate Rajat Nair said that under the law, these marriages would be void but someone has to challenge it. If there is consensus and immediate family members have no problem and no one approaches the court, occasion to seek this marriage as void will not arise.advertisementHe said that under law, marriage would be recognised only with one person, and person can't be married to two persons at same time.He agreed that these cases may fall under the grey area as these practices persist as customary tradition in certain areas and amongst some tribal communities, adding that courts have repeatedly emphasised that monogamy is the only valid form of marriage under the actOn the other hand, Advocate Ibad Mushtaq said that as far as practices of Scheduled Tribes are concerned, the same are not governed by the Hindu Marriage Act. Thus, no disability attaches to the customary practices of STs. The marriage would therefore be valid.Advocate Tarini Nayak said that the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 does carve out certain exceptions in favour of certain customary practices, thereby allowing for the possibility of multiple marriages if sanctioned by custom.Furthermore, a potential loophole exists within Section 5 of the Act, which stipulates that at the time of the solemnization of marriage, neither party should have a spouse living.advertisementThis wording arguably implies that if a person marries two persons simultaneously—without either party being or having a 'spouse' in a legal sense at that precise moment—such a union may technically fall outside the ambit of a void marriage, thus creating an interpretative gap in the statutory scheme.- Ends
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Now, Chandigarh to offer free education till 18 for children with special needs
In a significant step towards ensuring equal opportunities and building an inclusive education system, the UT administration on Friday launched a dedicated education policy for children with special needs (CWSN). Punjab governor and UT administrator Gulab Chand Kataria unveiling the inclusive education policy for children with special needs in the presence of chief secretary Rajeev Verma, education secretary Preerna Puri and director school education Harsuhinder Pal Singh Brar in Chandigarh on Friday. (HT Photo) The policy, framed in line with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, includes several key provisions such as free education till the age of 18, 3% reservation under EWS/disadvantaged group category in admissions and availability of textbooks in accessible formats. Children with benchmark disabilities, as defined under the RPwD Act, 2016, are considered children with special needs. Unveiling the policy at Punjab Raj Bhavan, Punjab governor and UT administrator Gulab Chand Kataria said, 'This policy is not just limited to opening the doors of schools, it also aims to bring out the inherent talent and potential of these children. Chandigarh is proud to be strengthening the spirit of equal opportunity and inclusion in the field of education.' The policy will directly benefit 3,175 children with special needs, currently studying in government schools across Chandigarh, and is likely to set standards for private schools as well. At present, the education department has 16 special educators at the JBT level, 20 at the TGT level and 21 resource teachers under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme. Policy a result of HC directions The policy comes in line with directions issued by the Punjab and Haryana high court in two cases in 2017 and 2019. Under the new policy, free and compulsory education will now be extended to children with disabilities in government and aided schools till the age of 18, up from the earlier age limit of 14. Children who are unable to attend school due to their disability will be provided home-based education. This will be supported through transport allowances and other support services. The policy also gives CWSN the right to admission in all-inclusive neighbourhood schools, and mandates a 3% reservation for them within the 25% quota reserved under the EWS/disadvantaged category under the Right to Education Act. Private recognised schools will also be required to admit children with special needs and provide them with appropriate educational support in line with this policy. To ensure the inclusive classrooms are run effectively, the policy mandates the presence of trained special educators, adapted curriculum, Braille and large print books, sign language resources and a special evaluation system. For children with more severe disabilities, links with special schools and integrated education centres will be strengthened. Vocational and skill training will also be provided from Class 9 onwards to help students with special needs become self-reliant. Additionally, state-level sports competitions for CWSN will be held in collaboration with the department of sports. The number of government schools with Special Resource Centres, which offer therapy, counselling for parents, assessments and functional academics, has been increased from five to 20 under this policy. To ensure smooth and effective implementation, every school will have a grievance redress committee. A state-level monitoring committee has also been set up. Also present at the policy launch were UT chief secretary Rajiv Verma, principal secretary to governor Vivek Pratap Singh, education secretary Prerna Puri and director of school education Harsuhinder Pal Singh Brar.


New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Delhi HC seeks NIA's response on Er Rashid's interim bail Plea
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Friday sought a response from the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on a plea by jailed Lok Sabha MP Sheikh Abdul Rashid seeking interim bail to attend the ongoing Monsoon session of Parliament. Rashid, popularly known as Engineer Rashid and in jail in a 2017 terror funding case, has also challenged a trial court order asking him to bear travel expenses of Rs 1.44 lakh per day for attending Parliament in custody from July 24 to August 4. A bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Shalinder Kaur issued notice to the NIA on the plea and listed the matter for further hearing on July court is also scheduled to hear on July 29 Rashid's regular bail plea in the case. The Baramulla MP has been lodged in Tihar jail since 2019 after he was arrested by the NIA under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in the case. During the brief hearing, Rashid's counsel submitted that the MP has already been saddled with Rs 17 lakh cost to represent the public at large in Parliament. Rashid sought interim bail or custody parole with travel expenses to carry out his duty as a parliamentarian. Next hearing scheduled for July 29 A bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Shalinder Kaur issued notice to the National Investigation Agency on Rashid's plea and listed the matter for further hearing on July 29.


New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Madras HC flags procedural lapses in probing caste discrimination complaints
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has flagged procedural lapses in probing complaints of caste discrimination filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, and directed the Tamil Nadu DGP to ensure strict compliancy with the law. 'In several matters relating to complaints made under SC/ST (PoA), procedural lapses are being noticed. The second respondent-DGP shall communicate a copy of this order to all SPs who shall ensure strict compliance with the provisions of the SC/ST (PoA) Act and the Rules, particularly Rule 7 relating to rank of the IO (investigating officer) and time-bound filing of final report,' said Justice P Velmurugan in a recent order. Citing a Supreme Court order, he said when a complaint discloses a cognisable offence under the provisions of the SC/ST (PoA) Act, 'no preliminary inquiry is permissible either under this Act or the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)' and the inquiry on the complaint shall be held by an officer in the rank of a DSP and not by an inspector as provided under Section 7 (1) of the Act.