Major motorway closed after lorry bursts into flames as drivers face hour-long delays and 7 miles of congestion
Emergency services rushed to the M26 at around 2pm today to reports of the fire.
2
2
The blaze, which erupted close to junction 22 for Rishworth Moor, West Yorkshire, has sparked huge delays with drivers told to take alternative routes.
Motorists have been urged to avoid the area as three lanes are currently closed until junction 21 for Milnrow.
National Highways warned of delays of up to 75 minutes and seven miles of congestion eastbound between Junction 22 and Junction 24.
It's believed the fire was caused by an oil spillage, which is being now being tended to.
The operator said: "The M62 in West Yorkshire is CLOSED eastbound between J22 (Denshaw) and J24 (Huddersfield) due to a lorry fire.
"Emergency services are in attendance. More information to follow soon. Thanks for your patience if you're held up."
A spokesperson from the West Yorkshire Fire Service said: 'We were called at 13.49 to reports of a large vehicle on fire on the M62 – JCT 22/23 Eastbound.
'We have two crews at the scene who have extinguished a cab and trailer on fire, with no reports of injuries.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Car
44 minutes ago
- Auto Car
Four years after its UK launch, Hyundai is now betting big on Genesis with new dealer strategy
Close The surge in growth this century of the Hyundai Motor Group (HMG) means it is now the world's third largest car maker, behind only Toyota and the Volkswagen Group. The third brand in HMG alongside Hyundai and Kia is premium newcomer Genesis, and 'there is unwavering belief [within HMG] that it will be very successful,' says Ashley Andrew, Genesis UK managing director. 'Then you're just discussing the when and the how.' Strong stuff, yet as the likes of Infiniti, DS and probably even Lexus will testify, launching a premium brand is about as tough a test as you can get in today's car industry, particularly in Europe.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
What is the car finance scandal - and what could today's ruling mean for motorists?
The UK's Supreme Court is set to deliver a landmark ruling today that could have billion-pound consequences for banks and impact millions of motorists. The essential question that the country's top court has been asked to answer is this: should customers be fully informed about the commission dealers earn on their purchase? However, the Supreme Court is only considering one of two cases running in parallel regarding the mis-selling of car finance. Here is everything you need to know about both cases, and how the ruling this afternoon may (or may not) affect any future compensation scheme. What is the Supreme Court considering? The Supreme Court case concerns complaints related to the non-disclosure of commission. This applies to 99% of car finance cases. When you buy a car on finance, you are effectively loaned the money, which you pay off in monthly instalments. These loans carry interest, organised by the brokers (the people who sell you the finance plan). These brokers earn money in the form of a commission (which is a percentage of the interest payments). Last year, the Court of Appeal ruled in favour of three motorists who were not informed that the car dealerships they agreed finance deals with were also being paid 25% commission, which was then added to their bills. The ruling said it was unlawful for the car dealers to receive a commission from lenders without obtaining the customer's informed consent to the payment. However, British lender Close Brothers and South Africa's FirstRand appealed the decision, landing it in the Supreme Court. What does the second case involve? The second case is being driven by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and involves discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs). Under these arrangements, brokers and dealers increased the amount of interest they earned without telling buyers and received more commission for it. This is said to have incentivised sellers to maximise interest rates. The FCA banned this practice in 2021. However, a high number of consumers have complained they were overcharged before the ban came into force. The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) said in May that they were dealing with 20,000 complaints. In January 2024, the FCA announced a review into whether motor finance customers had been overcharged because of past use of DCAs. It is using its powers to review historical motor finance commission arrangements across multiple firms - all of whom deny acting inappropriately. The FCA also said it is looking into a "consumer redress scheme" that means firms would need to offer appropriate compensation to customers affected by the issue. An estimated 40% of car finance deals are likely to be eligible for compensation over motor finance deals taken out between 2007 and 2021, when the DCAs were banned. To find out how you can tell if you've been mis-sold car finance, read the following explainer from our reporter Megan Harwood-Baynes. How does the ruling affect potential compensation? In short, the Supreme Court ruling could impact the scale and reach that a compensation scheme is likely to have. The FCA said in March that it will consider the court's decision and if it concludes motor finance customers have lost out from widespread failings by firms, it is "likely [to] consult on an industry-wide redress scheme". This would mean affected individuals wouldn't need to complain, but they would be paid out an amount dictated by the FCA. However, no matter what the court decides, the FCA could go ahead with a redress scheme. The regulator said it will confirm if it is proposing a scheme within six weeks of the Supreme Court's decision. What impact could this have on lenders? Analysts at HSBC said last year the controversy could be estimated to cost up to £44bn. Alongside Close Brothers, firms that could be affected include Barclays, Santander and the UK's largest motor finance provider Lloyds Banking Group - which organises loans through its Black Horse finance arm. Lloyds has already set aside £1.2bn to be used for potential compensation. The potential impact on the lending market and the wider economy could be so great that Chancellor Rachel Reeves is considering intervening to overrule the Supreme Court, according to The Guardian. Treasury officials have been looking at the potential of passing new legislation alongside the Department for Business and Trade that could slash the potential compensation bill. The Treasury said in response to the claim that it does not "comment on speculation" but hopes to see a "balanced judgment".
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Cornwall mum 'could be alive' if older driver rules changed
Claire Eady believes that if the rules for older drivers were different her mum would still be here summer 79-year-old Geraldine Gibson died after pulling out into oncoming traffic near her home in Cornwall."I never thought I would have to say the words 'my mum's been killed in a car crash'," said Mrs Eady, who said regulations for drivers over the age of 70 were "unsafe and inadequate" and needed an the moment there is no upper age limit for driving in the UK, with around 500 licence holders aged between 100 and government said it was committed to improving road safety. Mrs Gibson was trying to cross the A30 at Plusha near Launceston to meet a friend when she pulled into the path of another inquest heard there was nothing the other driver, who suffered minor injuries, could have done to avoid Highways told the hearing the junction had since been altered after other accidents but Mrs Eady, from West Sussex, said older age was "absolutely a factor" in her mother's learned her mother was struggling to manoeuvre beforehand and had a separate Eady said she believed arthritis and an earlier stroke may also have affected her mum's driving."I don't think my mum ever would have thought she needed to stop driving because there were too many things that depended on her being out in a car," she have a legal responsibility to notify the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Authority (DVLA) of conditions affecting their fitness to drive, but Mrs Eady said this felt insufficient."You can't really rely on the individual to do that... especially if it's their only way of getting out," she said she would like medical professionals to be legally required to notify authorities and for there to be mandatory testing for those over 70. What are the current rules regarding older drivers?Drivers must renew their licence aged 70 and every three years thereafterThere is no upper age limit for driving in the UK, with about 500 licence holders aged between 100 and 108Drivers have a legal responsibility to self-declare medical conditions that could affect driving to the DVLAGuidance by the DVLA states health professionals should inform the agency if a patient cannot or will not, but it is not a legal requirement As the UK population ages, the number of older drivers is also increasing, with licence holders aged 70 and over going up by about 200,000 a year, according to the of Transport statistics show older drivers make up about 14% of all licence holders but account for a quarter of those killed on the roads, and that people aged over 75 and under 25 are at highest risk of being killed or seriously hurt in a Heard from the Older Drivers Forum, which supports motorists to continue driving safely for longer, said the "vast majority of older drivers have a wealth of experience, confidence and tolerance".But he added: "As we age, our relative frailty means that older drivers are often over represented in serious injury collisions, particularly for the age group of 80 and above." Mr Heard said elderly drivers were more likely to crash due to illness or errors in judgement, while accidents involving younger drivers were more likely through speed or taking said he supported mandatory referrals of medical conditions by health professionals and advised concerned family members to encourage mature driver BBC has had exclusive access to a report, which said many people were "unaware" of their legal obligation to inform the DVLA of certain medical conditions and health professionals were "reluctant to" do research, prepared for a coroner in April, showed less than 10% of DVLA notifications were made by medical professionals and other third parties. The report's author, Dr Carol Hawley, research fellow at the University of Warwick, said the system "does need to change".She said her research suggested there was underreporting of visual and medical conditions "because there are not that many notifications compared to the number of driving licence holders and the number of people that have those conditions".Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said the college would welcome a more formalised approach "to ensure that any necessary breaches of doctor-patient confidentiality are protected in law and avoid undermining patient trust".The Association of Optometrists and The College of Optometrists said they "strongly support" the introduction of regular mandatory vision checks for all drivers and said the current system was "not fit for purpose". Elsewhere in Cornwall, Hilary Nias said she "feels very strongly" that change is needed, following her sister-in-law's fatal accident."It was a tragic end to a really interesting life," she said, adding family had repeatedly warned her that her driving was Nias, 90, pulled out onto the A39 at Devoran and crashed onto a roundabout when she mistook the accelerator pedal for the died from her injuries five months later. Mrs Nias said her sister-in-law could "only just" see over the dashboard and was having problems with spatial awareness. "That needed testing and assessing... it could possibly have avoided my sister-in-law's ghastly accident - and many others," she Nias applied for her driving licence to be renewed within the three years before her accident and no medical conditions were her inquest Emma Hillson, assistant coroner for Cornwall, wrote to the Department of Transport and the DVLA, highlighting the lack of any "requirement for there to be any form of medical check or assessment to confirm fitness to drive".Mrs Nias said she was "frankly depressed" by the response, which did not suggest any changes to the current system. There is a higher proportion of elderly people in the South West of England than the national average, and some here see driving as a Bodmin, 130 older people meet weekly at the town hall at an Age Concern social group. Some drive to get Reg Harris, 85, said giving up driving would "absolutely crucify" his Trevenna, 88, added: "I wouldn't be able to get anywhere, do anything... I'd just as well sit in the armchair and wait to die."Drivers can refer themselves for an older driving assessment by Driving Mobility at a cost, but referrals from the DVLA, police or NHS are free. The charity said more than 10,000 people aged over 70 in England underwent one in 2024 - 0.2% of drivers of that age. The local road safety partnership Vision Zero South West wants more public awareness as well as tighter said 176 drivers aged over 60 were killed or seriously injured on Cornwall and Devon's road network in Alison Hernandez said: "We want to protect people's lives because it is absolutely devastating when this happens to people and their families."Asked what could be done to support older drivers who felt they had no choice but to carry on because public transport often was not good enough in rural areas, Hernandez said her office was planning to run a campaign "to educate older drivers on how they can be at their best behind the wheel". The government told the BBC the DVLA was analysing findings from recent inquests, and from a 2023 call for evidence on the legislative framework governing driver licensing for people with medical said the DVLA would continue to engage with healthcare professionals and their regulatory bodies to understand if there may be circumstances where they "could be encouraged or supported in notifying DVLA of a patient's medical condition".A Department for Transport spokesperson added: "The NHS recommends adults should have their eyes tested every two years and drivers are legally required to inform the DVLA if they have a condition which affects their ability to drive. "We are committed to improving road safety and continue to explore ways to achieve this."Additional reporting by Lauren Woodhead, England Data Unit
