logo
Unpacking the 2025 South African Car of the Year winners

Unpacking the 2025 South African Car of the Year winners

TimesLIVE07-05-2025
History often repeats itself. In the 2024 South African Car of the Year (SA Coty) competition, it was the BMW 7 Series that won, with the Suzuki Fronx in second and the BMW M2 third.
The 2025 instalment played out similarly: BMW took the main trophy with its X3, followed by the Suzuki Swift as runner-up and third place going to the BMW M5. In addition to finishing on the podium, these contenders also won the titles in their respective categories: Premium (BMW X3); Budget (Suzuki Swift) and Performance (BMW M5).
In the Adventure Utility class it was the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado that outpaced its peers, while the Volkswagen Tiguan showed its supremacy in the Family category. The Bavarian brand rounded off its dominance with the 5 Series being awarded the top spot in the Executive category.
THE PROCESS
We have previously written about how SA Car of the Year works and published an account of impressions after the testing days for the 2025 edition. Before we unpack the winners in further detail, here is a quick refresh on how it goes down at the event, which is sponsored by Old Mutual Insure.
SA Coty is not a consumer-orientated competition. Rather, it focuses on showcasing the best the motor industry has to offer in terms of new releases, looking at models introduced within a 12-month period. The theme of seeking and recognising 'excellence' is the SA Coty cornerstone: contenders that elevate standards not just for their respective genres but the collective car family.
Inevitably, there will be — and has always been — vehement debate as to what constitutes a worthy SA Coty. The good thing is the competition is not based on whims, guesswork or a random ballot.
Organised under the auspices of the SA Guild of Mobility Journalists, (SAGMJ), SA Coty begins with a semifinalist table of eligible vehicles, eventually whittled down to an ultimate spread of finalists that will compete for the top honour. The vehicles are also categorised. In the 2025 competition there were 17 models in the six categories of Budget, Premium, Family, Adventure Utility, Performance and Executive.
In March the 27-strong jury comprising respected motoring journalists and content creators evaluates the contenders on road and track, scoring the models using an exhaustive rubric, with every conceivable aspect under scrutiny — from suspension to safety features, value for money, infotainment capabilities, driver assistance functions, economy and more. The scores are tallied and audited with the winners announced at an annual event hosted by the SAGMJ.
It is interesting to note that BMW is the manufacturer with the most number of title wins in the history of SA Coty, which kicked off in 1986. This year marks the eighth victory for the Munich marque. The first BMW model to win was the 735i in 1988.
THE 2025 SA COTY
Image: Supplied
BMW introduced the G45 X3 to national media towards the end of last year. Much like the 3 Series did when it was produced locally, this is a model that rouses your sense of patriotism: it is built in Tshwane, for the local region and various export markets. The manufacturer invested about R4.2bn in its Rosslyn facility to make this happen, a considerable investment with effects beyond that of car production; creating jobs on the line and across the supply chain.
Aside from stoking warm, fuzzy feelings about its made-in-SA status, the X3 made a positive impression in the areas that matter. Fair enough, the styling continues to divide opinion. Those oversized kidney grilles, for example, are goofy. But under the skin it proved to be a product of great substance.
The X3 is sold in diesel, petrol and plug-in hybrid derivatives. For the test days, the manufacturer supplied the 20d xDrive derivative. The quietness of the vehicle was remarkable for an oil-burner, hushed and devoid of vibration to the point where you would hardly notice it was a diesel.
On the road its refinement levels shone, with a level of comfort and insulation that appears to upstage cars with more luxurious constitutions and higher price tags. The X3 ranges from R1,136,417 to R1,545,447.
Its cabin is a masterclass in how digitisation ought to be done. Screen-intensive, yes, but without abandoning familiarity and outright ease of use. The driver assistance functions have been fine-tuned for the nuances of South African roads, with a lane-keeping aid that is never flummoxed and steering assistance that is not intrusive. It is progressive without being overly complicated.
With its torque-rich performance, superb economy, sharp dynamic reflexes typical of a BMW, spacious interior and a slick user experience, the X3 20d xDrive is a complete package and deserving winner.
It was allocated to the Premium class, competing with the Volvo EX30 and Omoda C9.
SWIFT PUNCHES ABOVE ITS WEIGHT
Image: Supplied
It might not have won the competition outright, but its custodians can be proud of the Swift's performance, trumping cars costing several times more.
The humble B-segment Suzuki costs between R224,900 and R291,900. We tested the 1.2 GLX manual coming in at R271,900. Even looking at the specifications sheet of the entry-level car reveals an impressive amount of kit, most notably the inclusion of six airbags. This is a big deal at the price point.
Powered by a zingy three-cylinder engine, the Japanese hatchback is an antidote to rising petrol prices. In the heat of testing the plucky Swift cemented initial, positive impressions: it feels much sturdier than its 917kg mass would have you believe. The cabin, though sombre with its gratuitous black hues, seems to be screwed together tightly.
The overall value for money offered by the Swift GLX is exceptional. From a large infotainment display, with niceties such as a reverse camera to cruise control, it elevates the typical economy car experience.
Placing second overall, the Swift was assigned to the Budget category, where it outscored the Mahindra XUV3X0 and GAC GS3 Emzoom.
M5 DELIVERS EVERYTHING IN EXCESS
Third overall, the BMW M5 triumphed over its peers in the Performance category, the 5.0 l Ford Mustang and four-cylinder Mercedes-AMG C 63.
On the test days, the Bavarian powerhouse was a lot to take in for most. From its bulging physique (finished in green paint) to the opulent, lounge-like interior execution, it is a car that makes a bombastic statement from the get-go. As if the basic sticker price of R2,745,000 had not already seized attention.
Then you get behind the wheel. Though it can be driven in pure electric mode, the main purpose of the hybrid system is to aid performance. With the V8 on song and electric systems in play, the M5 accelerates ferociously, four-wheel steering allowed jurors to scythe through the technical layout at Zwartkops and the tenacious xDrive grip kept the super-saloon on the bitumen.
Critically, viewed against its forebears, much can be said about the heavier, more complicated G90 M5. In isolation, the latest model still delivers on the mandate set by the original: to deliver devastating performance in a practical and luxurious four-door format.
TIGUAN TOP IN FAMILY VALUES
The Mini Countryman and Jaecoo J7 lick their wounds while the spoils of victory are enjoyed by Volkswagen's Tiguan in the Family vehicle category.
It carries a base price of R664,500 and the unit we tested was the 1.4 TSI R-Line (R766,300). Cost-wise, that placed the fighter between the Chinese and British-German peers.
A conservative evolution over its predecessor, the familiarity of the Tiguan and adherence to traditional Volkswagen values seemed to hold it in good stead.
Quirk-free ergonomics, semi-autonomous driver assistance functions that work well in the real world, above average build quality and commendable road manners, the German SUV is a cohesive product.
It also brings dazzle factor with features such as massaging seats, a nice-to-have not usually expected from its direct class rivals.
PRADO A CAPABLE ADVENTURER
The Adventure Utility category winner is the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado.
Image: Supplied
Mitsubishi's latest Triton and the bold GWM P500 put in a respectable fight for Adventure Utility category honours, but the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado won the affections of the jury.
The Japanese off-roader has an enviable reputation and heritage. From a visual standpoint, the latest iteration draws endearingly from the square-edged, wagon-like templates of forebears.
Inside though, it is a tad more progressive than usually expected from Toyota's ladder-frame SUVs, with sizeable screens complementing the retention of physical switchgear, as well as materials that lean towards the premium side in texture.
Our 2.8 GD-6 VX-R (R1,448,900) tester sealed its fate on the off-road course, markedly superior in the way it handled business. Effortless terrain mashing was delivered by the intelligent four-wheel drive system and electronic aids, including a clever crawl function, essentially cruise control for bundu bashing.
Hosed-off and nosed onto asphalt, the heavyset Prado delivers a comfortable driving experience, while the proven 2.8 l turbocharged-diesel unit brings sufficient grunt and reasonable economy to the party.
FIVE DEEMED EXECUTIVE LEADER
This was a close two-horse race. In the Executive class, we saw an age-old battle between BMW and Mercedes-Benz, as the 5 Series and E-Class went toe-to-toe for supremacy.
They were evenly matched, both being diesel derivatives. If it were based on looks alone, though, the elegant Mercedes-Benz would have clinched the title without blinking.
At R1,278,371 the price of the 520d M Sport tester undercut that of the E220d AMG Line (R1,541,260) by a significant amount.
This appears to have helped the BMW edge ahead, bolstered by its cushy cabin environment, silky ride quality and agile handling characteristics.
Like the X3, the high level of digitisation served by the 5 Series strikes the sweet spot between future-forward and user-friendly.
THE PEOPLE'S CHOICE
Mahindra's XUV 3XO was the People's Choice.
Image: Supplied
Though Mahindra's XUV 3XO failed to secure a trophy from the jury, it garnered the confidence of the public.
Through its channels, Old Mutual Insure conducts a People's Choice competition, allowing South Africans to vote for what they believe should be SA Coty. The new Mahindra secured the highest number of votes among the 17 finalists.
It ranges in price from R254,999 to R404,999.
On the test days, it rated well for its tractable motor, high safety specification and decent road manners. Referring to my notes, the intrusive driver aids, cheap-looking interior and plainly terrible stop-start system were low points.
This is the second time Mahindra won the People's Choice award. In 2024 it was the Scorpio-N that received the accolade.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch: BMW M3 CS Touring sets new Nürburgring lap record
Watch: BMW M3 CS Touring sets new Nürburgring lap record

The Citizen

time13 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Watch: BMW M3 CS Touring sets new Nürburgring lap record

The BMW M3 CS Touring has set a new lap record for wagons at the Nürburgring Nordschleife. In July 2025, BMW put the new M2 CS through its paces at the Nürburgring Nordschleife, with the German automaker's most compact M car completing a lap around The Green Hell in just 7:25.5 minutes – the quickest time ever recorded in the Compact Car category. However, now, BMW has decided to see just how quick its most hardcore M3 wagon can complete a lap around the 20.8km northern loop of this revered race track. The first BMW Touring to don the 'CS' badge, the M3 CS Touring set a lap time of 7:29.490 minutes, making it the quickest wagon to ever lap the Nürburgring Nordschleife. Noteworthy, it bested the previous record, held by its non-CS sibling, by just over five seconds. In addition, the time set by the M3 CS Touring is just over a second shy of the M3 CS sedan's. 'From the very beginning, it was clear that the BMW M3 CS Touring would set new standards in dynamics. With a time under 7:30 minutes, this model impressively demonstrates that this vehicle concept perfectly combines racing DNA with everyday usability,' said BMW M CEO Franciscus van Meel. As a reminder, the CS-badged M3 Touring employs the same engine as its 'standard' stablemate – BMW's familiar 3l turbocharged inline-six. However, for the CS, the German marque has turned up the wick; increasing the peak power output to a healthier 405kW (up 15kW). Torque remains unchanged, with 650N.m delivered to both the fore and aft axle via via BMW's eight-speed Steptronic transmission. According to the Bavarian brand, the increase in power output, several mechanical revisions, and weight saving, the M3 CS Touring sprints to the three-figure marker from a standstill in just 3.5 seconds; an improvement of 0.1 seconds over the non-CS model. However, the CS's 11.7-second 0-200km/h time eclipses the latter car's by 1.2 seconds. In addition, the top speed has increased, from 280km/h to 300km/h. Click here to browse thousands of new and used vehicles here with CARmag! The post Watch: BMW M3 CS Touring Sets New Nürburgring Lap Record appeared first on CAR Magazine. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal.

Woman claims BMW Financial Services' non-cooperation led to R787,000 debt
Woman claims BMW Financial Services' non-cooperation led to R787,000 debt

IOL News

time4 days ago

  • IOL News

Woman claims BMW Financial Services' non-cooperation led to R787,000 debt

A South African woman claims that BMW Financial Services failed to assist her when she struggled to make payments on her R787,000 vehicle, leading to a distressing financial battle that raises questions about consumer rights and corporate responsibility. Image: Supplied A woman who bought a car through BMW Financial Services is accusing the motor company of failing to cooperate when she indicated that she was unable to continue making payments to her car. The woman, who has chosen to remain anonymous, purchased a BMW 218i Gran Coupe M Sport in October 2021, with the vehicle being financed through BMW Financial Services. According to the terms of the agreement, she was granted a credit facility exceeding R787,000 to cover the cost of the vehicle. This financing arrangement came with an estimated monthly repayment obligation of more than R11,000, placing a significant financial commitment on her. She was able to maintain her monthly instalments for just over six months before coming to a realisation that the monthly instalments were financially not viable as it was consuming nearly half her salary leaving her with insufficient funds to cover her basic financial needs and other financial obligations. This growing strain on her finances forced her to reassess her ability to continue honouring the credit agreement, prompting her to reach out to BMW Financial Services to seek relief or explore alternative solutions. She explained that after recognising the financial strain, she approached BMW Financial Services to request assistance in selling the vehicle, hoping to find a solution that would alleviate her debt burden. However, she was informed by the motor company that the total amount required to settle the outstanding debt on the vehicle was R814,000. At the same time, BMW offered to purchase the vehicle for only R600,000, which would leave her with a significant shortfall of R214,000. Despite her efforts to engage and find a mutually beneficial resolution, she alleges that no further assistance, guidance, or alternative options were provided by the company. This left her feeling abandoned and solely responsible for the substantial debt, with no meaningful support from the institution that had financed the purchase. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading "After mounting arrears and further attempts to engage BMW, our client voluntarily surrendered the vehicle on June 7, 2022 – the valuation provided by BMW reflected a large shortfall, and she took back the vehicle in an effort to secure a better private offer," said her attorney, Liesel Kriel. After relocating from Gauteng to Durban in an effort to improve her financial circumstances, she said she actively sought out better trade-in or resale offers for the vehicle. She managed to secure more favourable valuations from multiple third-party dealers, which exceeded the initial offer made by BMW. In a bid to resolve the matter, she submitted the alternative quotes to BMW Financial Services, along with supporting financial documentation detailing her income and financial hardship. However, despite her proactive approach and willingness to cooperate, she claims that BMW failed to respond and completely ignored her submissions. To her shock, she later discovered in November 2022 that the vehicle had been transferred out of her name as far back as June 2022 without her knowledge, permission, or any formal notification. This discovery raised serious concerns for her, not only about the handling of the vehicle but also about the lack of transparency and communication from BMW Financial Services throughout the process. After the shocking discovery she lodged a complaint against BMW with the Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa (MIOSA), which directed her to the National Credit Regulator (NCR) due to the matter relating to reckless lending. According to her, it was around this time that , she was also informed that legal proceedings had been instituted against her by BMW Financial Services. She expressed shock and frustration, particularly because she had previously notified BMW in writing, via email, of her change of address following her relocation from Gauteng to Durban. Despite this clear communication, she claims that BMW continued to serve legal documents at her former address, effectively depriving her of the opportunity to respond to or engage with the legal process in a timely and meaningful manner. As a result, she believes that BMW acted negligently and unfairly, further compounding her distress and legal vulnerability. She said the NCR process was plagued with delays – it was only in June 2024 that the NCR advised her the matter had not been considered and then issued a non-referral notice, prompting her to refer the matter to the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT). During the tribunal proceedings, it was noted that woman had opted not to defend herself when the case was in the High Court, and as a result, her claims of reckless lending against BMW were not considered. In February 2025, the NCT held that the high court is a competent forum that had already reached a decisive conclusion on her failure to honour her financial commitments. "Any subsequent ruling by the tribunal regarding reckless lending will impact the high court's judgment, which goes against the principle of res judicata," said the tribunal. She said following the judgment, in March 2025, BMW attempted to enforce the judgment and execute the warrant at her erstwhile address – the address was later amended. "Due to BMW's lack of cooperation, our client had no choice but to obtain legal assistance and as such our offices proceeded to launch a rescission application based on the pending regulatory processes and improper service," said Kriel. Kriel said BMW has opposed the rescission application, raising technical defences, including the time delay in bringing the application. "BMW maintains that our client was aware of the proceedings, had a chance to respond, and that the regulatory complaints were merely delay tactics," Kriel added. When approached for comment, BMW declined to speak on the matter, stating that it remained sub judice. "I have, however, determined the matter is still being considered by a court. We cannot, therefore, provide comments to you at this time," said BMW spokesperson, Hailey Philander. In closing, the woman's case reflects the complex and often frustrating journey consumers face when navigating disputes with large financial institutions. Despite her efforts to seek assistance from BMW Financial Services, the National Credit Regulator, and eventually the National Consumer Tribunal, procedural technicalities and jurisdictional limitations ultimately stood in the way of her reckless lending claim being meaningfully assessed. The High Court's prior ruling based on her failure to defend the matter effectively closed the door to further adjudication by the Tribunal, citing the legal principle of res judicata, which prevents re-litigation of issues already decided by a competent court. The attempted enforcement of the judgment at her former address and the subsequent legal wrangling over the rescission application have only added to the woman's sense of being sidelined by a system she believes failed to accommodate her financial vulnerability. Her legal representative, Kriel, argues that the mishandling of notices and the disregard of pending regulatory processes justify reopening the case. BMW, however, continues to oppose the rescission, framing the delays and regulatory complaints as tactical manoeuvres rather than legitimate grievances. With BMW declining to comment further due to the matter being sub judice, the case remains in legal limbo highlighting the wider challenges consumers face when trying to assert their rights in the face of institutional power and procedural complexity. IOL

Driving impressions: why the Suzuki Swift deserves its crown as the top hatchback
Driving impressions: why the Suzuki Swift deserves its crown as the top hatchback

IOL News

time6 days ago

  • IOL News

Driving impressions: why the Suzuki Swift deserves its crown as the top hatchback

The Suzuki Swift is fitted with Suzuki's new 1.2-litre three cylinder engine that delivers 60kW and 112NM of torque. Image: Supplied Currently sitting in second place on the vehicle sales charts, it's not for nothing that Suzuki has been hitting the lights out with their refreshingly cheerful portfolio. Chief among those is the Swift that's dominating the passenger car market. Popular among first-time buyers It also helps that the brand is selling their cars in the price and categories that South African consumers are spending their money on, starting in the sub R200 000 region, with the most expensive evening out under R550 000. The B-segment hatchback Swift has also proven popular with first-time buyers, and I know of quite a few people who have bought one for their children going on to study further after school. We spent some time in the flagship 1.2 GLX, priced at R271 900, and it's easy to understand why they are proving so popular and walked away with the 2025 'Best Budget Car' title in the Consumer Awards. Engine Replacing the previous four-cylinder engine, the Swift is now fitted with Suzuki's new 1.2-litre three-cylinder petrol mill that delivers 60kW and 112NM of torque. The test unit was fitted with a five-speed manual transmission, although there is a continuously variable transmission (CVT) available as well. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The Suzuki Swift is grippy and light on its feet with quick and direct steering. Image: Supplied Exterior It's a good-looking little car as well, with the oval radiator grille with a black finish and muscular bumper dominating the front. The blacked-out A/B pillars provide a 'floating roof' element, while the rear, with integrated hatch spoiler and 3D LED tail light clusters, has become a common sight on our roads. Fitted with 15-inch diamond-cut alloys, our test unit was a Grey Metallic, but I would opt for the blue or red, which provides a better view of the car's profile and also underscores its fun factor. Interior Inside there's a good old-fashioned analogue instrument cluster with a central colour LCD display allowing you to see consumption (instantaneous and average), range and several other helpful information. The seven-inch touchscreen infotainment system is Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatible and is also linked to the rearview camera. The rear seats provide a 60:40 split, while boot space is said to be 265 litres and 580 litres with the rear seats folded. Inside there's a good old fashioned analogue instrument cluster with a central colour LCD display. Image: Supplied Driving I found the manually adjustable black fabric seats to be comfortable and had no issues over longer distances, while they also provided decent support in tight and fast corners. The little three-pot motor proved to be rev-happy and responsive, albeit with some engine thrum in the cabin when pushed hard, but at the national speed limit or pottering around in the suburbs, it's hardly audible. Weighing in at less than a ton, the Suzuki Swift is grippy and light on its feet with quick and direct steering, making it easy to steer on the open road or in shopping mall parking bays. I do think, though, that loaded with four people and luggage, there's likely to be a lot of gear changing. Fortunately, the clutch is light and gear changes are slick and easy. With short bits of enthusiastic driving combined with regular runs, consumption stood at 5.1l/100km, not too far off the claimed 4.4l/100km. Safety Seeing as the Swift is likely to be many people's first car, safety is paramount, and it doesn't disappoint with six airbags (front, side and curtain), ABS brakes with EBD, Brake Assist Function, Electronic Stability Programme and rear ISOFIX anchors. After a few days, there's nothing not to like about the Suzuki Swift. It doesn't pretend to be something that it isn't. It's good looking, extremely easy to drive, has everything you need in terms of practicality and specification and with a reputation of reliability and frugalness, it deserves to be a top seller. It comes with a two-year/30,000km service plan and five-year/200,000km promotional warranty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store