Respect their dignity or risk of theft? Singaporeans divided on whether maid's belongings should be checked
In a post on r/askSingapore from last week, u/kouroubao wrote that they wanted to hear from 'more seasoned employers out there what the standard practice is and if anyone regretted not checking.'
Many local Reddit users have weighed in, some saying they would prefer to treat them with dignity.
'It's really up to you. I know people who have done it and people who didn't. For me, I didn't because anything important or worth more, it's locked away. If she wants to take anything lying around, it's replaceable for me. I just want to treat my employees with a little dignity,' one wrote.
Others, however, shared their particular negative experiences with helpers and encouraged the post author to do so, as it would be better to be safe than sorry. They told stories of how helpers were able to figure out safe combination codes and take away cash and other valuables, turn off nanny cams, and even place some jewelry into a cake, which, fortunately, the helper forgot in the fridge and wasn't able to bring with her.
There is a fine line to tread, however, between ensuring that a helper does not steal and riding roughshod over her rights. Employers can be debarred by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) for abusive behavior against domestic helpers. How long a debarment lasts depends on the severity of the offence. And in Singapore, where a helper is often a necessity and not a luxury, especially when both husband and wife are working and there are young children, elderly relatives, or both, in the house, not having a helper can be very difficult indeed.
What do the experts say? According to the MOM website, one way to secure your home is to prevent theft from taking place.
'You would need to advise your MDW (Migrant Domestic Worker) of the serious consequences of theft. It is a criminal offence in Singapore and the police will be involved. Offenders will be blacklisted and not be able to work in Singapore,' K Jayaprema, the President of the Association of Employment Agencies (Singapore) says .
Also, as one blog reminds us, 'Privacy is a fundamental human right recognised in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, and anyone, including our helpers, deserves privacy just like we do… There is no need to check on their personal belongings unless you have reasonable doubt or proof that they are committing acts of theft and so on.' /TISG
Read also: Maid says her employer did not give her Labour Day off, even though her contract includes PH entitlements
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
Man faces attempted murder charge over alleged knife attack at Kallang Wave Mall
SINGAPORE: A 26-year-old man will be charged on Tuesday (Jul 15) for the attempted murder of a 29-year-old woman at Kallang Wave Mall, police said. The Singapore Police Force (SPF) said in a news release that it was alerted to the incident at 1.25am on Monday, with preliminary investigations revealing that the man had allegedly attacked the woman with a knife. The man 'was disarmed and detained by members of the public before being arrested by police officers', said SPF. CNA understands that the man and the woman are not known to be connected. The woman was taken to hospital, where she received treatment for her injuries. She is in a stable condition, police added. Police said they will seek a court order to remand the man for psychiatric assessment. The offence of attempted murder where hurt is caused to any person by such act carries life imprisonment and caning, or imprisonment of up to 20 years and fine or caning, or both.
Independent Singapore
6 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Woman gets injured after PMD hit-and-run; has a message for the rider
FB screengrab/ COMPLAINT SINGAPORE SINGAPORE: A woman wrote in a popular local Facebook group that she was hit by a PMD (Personal Mobility Device) on Sunday morning (Jul 13) while walking down the 'slope from a bridge at Pasir Ris Block 124.' The incident occurred at around 7:15 a.m. After she got hit, the rider made a run for it and quickly disappeared. She posted photos of the bright red skin abrasions she sustained on her right knee, the lower part of the palm of her right hand, and the area near the elbow of her left arm. Screenshot Despite her injuries, she had a message for the person on the PMD. 'If the rider comes forward and apologises and compensates my bills (with receipt), I won't pursue further,' she wrote. Many people have shared her post. Some of the commenters on her post have urged her to report to the authorities. 'Hit and run, sure cannot find the PMD on your own. Lodge a police report ASAP,' one wrote. See also Inter-agency task force aims to reduce PMD fire risks 'Make a police report. What if he hits children instead?' another agreed. 'Just lodge a report. Usually, there's a camera on the bridge. Leaving you injured is already unacceptable,' a Facebook user chimed in. 'Just make a police report, and let the police do the job. Irresponsible behaviour from the PMD,' wrote another. A commenter urged her to reach out to the Pasir Ris Member of Parliament to ask for assistance. At present, the MPs from Pasir Ris–Changi GRC are In dranee Rajah , Desmond Tan, Sharael Taha, and Valerie Lee, all from the ruling People's Action Party (PAP). One commenter said she should report the incident to the Land Transport Authority (LTA) as well, although they admitted that this would be a bit of a challenge, since the PMD driver left the scene. Another seemed to agree, appealing to the LTA to 'Please wake up before more innocent will get hurt, maybe next time it might be kids or someone elderly.' One admitted that they were afraid of such an incident, writing, ' This is the worst thing I am worried about every day, that one day I might also be caught in such a situation.' Another appealed to the rider: 'Come out, PMD rider… Don't be a coward… just apologise… and settle.' The post author wrote in a comment that she has already lodged a police report. The Independent Singapore has reached out to her for further comments or updates. /TISG Read also: Netizens call out passenger for taking video of woman on PMD whom she said is just pretending to be disabled () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Independent Singapore
7 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Police investigate after someone else spends S$400+ of family's SG60 vouchers
SINGAPORE: A man said that a sizable portion of his SG60 vouchers, which were made available only this month, had been spent by someone else. He has filed a police report, and the matter is under investigation. According to a report in Shin Min Daily News on Sunday (Jul 13), someone else had used more than S$400 of the SG60 vouchers belonging to the household of a certain Mr Li, which had received a total of S$800 in vouchers. On Jul 2, the 64-year-old resident of Chinatown had claimed his vouchers at Kreta Ayer Community Club. To make it convenient for him, they were printed out by a staffer. The problem with the vouchers first came up on Jul 5, when his wife attempted to use S$12 in merchant vouchers when she was making a payment. She was told that one of the vouchers worth S$10 had already been used. The following day, Mr Li, who lives in Chinatown, attempted to use vouchers worth S$20 at a Sheng Siong grocery. To his surprise, he was informed that one of the vouchers he presented, also worth S$10, had already been used. When he alerted the community club staff about the issue, they asked Mr Li if any of his other family members had used the vouchers. After finding out from his two sons that they had not, Mr Li proceeded to lodge a report at the Police Cantonment Complex on Jul 7. An officer helped him access the transaction record of the vouchers via Mr Li's SingPass account. It showed that the person who used them began doing so on Jul 3, the day after they had been claimed. He also found out that the person who had used their household's vouchers had spent S$417 by Jul 12. In contrast, he and his wife had spent just S$42. Many of their vouchers were used in establishments such as a Jalan Kukoh medical hall, Old Airport Food Centre, and Redhill Food Centre—all of which are some distance from where Mr Li and his family live. He said that his vouchers were used to buy food such as buns, fish ball noodles, economy rice, and nasi lemak. Also, when the vouchers were used at a store in Chinatown, he asked if he could watch the camera footage from the store, in an attempt to find the person responsible for using their vouchers. He was told, however, that only the authorities can do so. All this came as a complete surprise to Mr Li and his wife, who have never claimed nor shared their vouchers online. The police confirmed with Shin Min Daily News that Mr Li had filed a police report and that they are looking into the matter. /TISG Read also: Singaporeans swap tips on stretching their SG60 vouchers—from durian to dental treatments
