We are worried AIADMK is making a historic mistake: Thirumavalavan
The VCK leader feared the AIADMK cadres are being turned into RSS activists.
His remarks came against the backdrop of the recent Murugan Devotees conference held by the Hindu Munnani in Madurai in which AIADMK leaders had also participated.
Participating at a function organised by his party to bestow awards on various personalities, he said B. R. Ambedkar was instrumental in ensuring that Hinduism, 'which does not foster brotherhood within', was not declared as the State religion in India.
Mr. Thirumavalavan asked if those accusing him of erasing 'sacred ash' on his forehead were ready to protest in favour of Scheduled Castes who are not being allowed inside temple (Droupathi Amman temple) in Melpathi in Villupuram.
'I accepted sacred ash because it was offered. Can I sport it always? I didn't accept it because I would get good Karma nor did I want to insult the gesture,' he said.
Mr. Thirumavalavan said, 'I am not asking you to accept me as your Shankaracharya...but just accept me as your brother.'
'Tamil land has five types of landscape and Murugan, who hails from Kurinji is the leader. He was born like us, lived like us and ruled the people. We have literature to support this. But he has been turned into 'Subramanian'. No Brahmin will name their children as Murugan - they will name them Subramanian or Skandan. Murugan from Sangam literature is different from the mythology,' he contended.
Mr. Thirumavalavan said, 'How can I sit and watch as the follower of Dr. Ambedkar and Periyar (E V Ramasamy) when our identity and history is stolen and new stories and identity are created to discriminate and divide us? We haven't started a party just to go to and State assembly.'
Dr. K. S. Chalam, former VC, Dravidian University (Ambedkar Sudar awardee), actor Sathyaraj (Periyar Oli), Thozhar Thiyagu (Marx Mamani), Dr. Pa. Jambulingam (Iyotheethasar Adhavan), V. Vaithilingam former CM, Puducherry (Kamarajar Kathir), Tamil scholar Prof. A. Shanmugadas (Semmozhi Gnayiru), P.A. Kaja Moinudeen Bagavi (Quaid-E-Millath Pirai) received awards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
K.N. Nehru questions EPS silence on Amit Shah's statement on forming coalition government
Claiming that the DMK alliance was strong, the party's principal secretary and Minister for Municipal Administration, K.N. Nehru, on Tuesday said it was the AIADMK alliance that was in a dilemma on whether to form a coalition government or not. Speaking to reporters here, he said AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswamy was claiming for so long that it would form a grand alliance to take on the DMK alliance. Some leaders claimed that some constituents of the DMK alliance would break away from it. But the DMK alliance remained strong. Chief Minister M.K. Stalin had said that differences, if any, with the alliance partners would be sorted out at the time of election. On the other hand, the AIADMK was yet to take a clear stand on forming a government on its own or leading a coalition government. It was initially stated that the AIADMK would lead the National Democratic Alliance government, if it won the election. Home Minister Amit Shah, when he visited Madurai recently stated that the NDA would form a coalition government. However, Mr. Palanisamy was yet to answer the doubts raised after Mr. Shah's statement. Mr. Nehru said the party cadre would go door-to-door under the 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu' campaign to enrol one crore members in the party. They would enrol new members by explaining the achievements of the DMK government and the anti-people actions of BJP government at the centre. On the AIADMK's protest over the delay in opening the new integrated bus terminus in Tiruchi, the Minister said that it had no right to talk about it as it had done nothing to build a new bus stand. The process of identifying a company for operation and maintenance of the new bus terminus was on. A committee that met in Chennai on Monday to take a decision on it had raised some queries. Action had been taken to answer them immediately. The bus terminus would be brought to use within one to two weeks.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Ziegenbalg memorial yet to materialise despite announcement in State Assembly
MAYILADUTHURAI Over a year after the Tamil Nadu government announced in the Legislative Assembly the construction of a memorial hall and statue for Bartholomäus Ziegenbalg, the German missionary and Tamil scholar, works have not been picked up yet. Ziegenbalg, who arrived in Tharangambadi on July 9, 1706, after a 222-day sea voyage, is credited with establishing the first Tamil printing press in India in 1712. He also founded Asia's first Protestant church, the New Jerusalem Church, and published Tamil grammars and dictionaries by transferring palm leaf manuscripts to paper. Widely acknowledged as a social reformer, he fought for education rights of women and marginalised communities, and set up schools, vocational training centres, and printing facilities. In the 2024 budget session, Chief Minister M. K. Stalin announced plans to build a memorial hall with a statue to honour Ziegenbalg's contributions and to be implemented by the Tamil Development and Information Department. The move followed years of demand by political parties and scholars. 'Officials have identified land outside Tharangambadi, in Poraiyar, which makes no sense. The memorial must be built inside the Danish Fort area where Ziegenbalg lived and worked,' said S. Johnson, a social activist. Officials from the Tamil Development Department confirmed that land near Tharangambadi police station, adjacent to the tahsildar office, had been earmarked for the purpose. A Government Order sanctioning funds was expected shortly, and construction was likely to begin within a month.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Why Hindi Is An Official Language And Not The National Language Of India
Last Updated: States are free to choose their own official languages as per the Constitution, and many do - from Tamil in Tamil Nadu to Marathi in Maharashtra to Assamese in Assam In a country as linguistically diverse as India, the question of language is not just about communication; it's about identity, culture, and power. While Hindi is often presumed to the Rashtrabhasha (national language), the fact is, it never officially became one. Instead, Hindi holds the constitutional status of Rajbhasha (official language), a crucial but fundamentally different designation. This distinction, though seemingly technical, lies at the heart of a long-standing debate that has influenced education policy, inter-state politics, and even shaped the federal structure of the country. And the issue resurfaced recently when the Maharashtra government was forced to withdraw its decision to make Hindi a compulsory third language in government schools after a surge of protests, the first major backlash against Hindi in the state in recent memory. An official language is one that is used for governmental functioning – administrative communication, drafting of laws, office work, and public services. In India, Hindi in the Devanagari script was adopted as the official language of the Union under Article 343 of the Constitution, to be used for central government communication. English was allowed to continue temporarily but, owing to political compromise and practical necessity, it continues as an associate official language even today. The purpose of an official language is functional; to streamline governance and communication. States are free to choose their own official languages as per the Constitution, and many do – from Tamil in Tamil Nadu to Marathi in Maharashtra to Assamese in Assam. A national language, by contrast, serves a symbolic purpose. It typically represents a country's cultural identity, unity, and historical continuity. A national language is seen as a unifying thread – often the most spoken or widely understood tongue – and may be used in education, cultural messaging, and national events. But crucially, India has no national language. The Constitution does not declare any language, not even Hindi, as the national language. This was a conscious choice made during the drafting of the Constitution. When the idea of making Hindi the national language was debated in the Constituent Assembly, it encountered stiff resistance, particularly from representatives of South India and the northeast, who feared the dominance of Hindi would marginalise their native languages and cultural identities. Why Hindi Didn't Become The National Language Although Hindi is spoken by over 40% of Indians and is the most widely used language in the country, it could never be elevated to the status of national language due to the country's federal and multicultural character. Language movements across states made it clear: a single national language would not reflect India's pluralism. In the 1950s and 60s, violent protests erupted in Tamil Nadu when the Centre attempted to make Hindi the sole official language. The anti-Hindi agitation became a pivotal moment in politics, influencing language policy and prompting the government to retain English alongside Hindi. Similar tensions emerged in Assam, Punjab, and parts of Maharashtra, where regional languages served as the bedrock of identity. Dr Ram Manohar Lohia's ' Angrezi Hatao, Hindi Lao" campaign in the same period did receive significant support in Hindi-speaking regions, but it could never generate national consensus. Over time, the movement to remove English lost momentum, and the campaign to impose Hindi faded as India's linguistic realities became too complex to ignore. Legal And Constitutional Position Legally, Hindi is the official language of the Union government, not of the country as a whole. The Constitution provides for 22 scheduled languages, and every state has the liberty to choose the language(s) for its administration and education. Even if Hindi were to be declared the national language today, it would not bind the states to implement it unless accompanied by a constitutional amendment – which, given the political sensitivities, remains highly unlikely. India's position is not unique. Many multilingual countries refrain from naming a single national language: Nepal recognises Nepali as the official language, not national. Bhutan uses Dzongkha officially but doesn't declare it a national language. Sri Lanka has two official languages – Sinhala and Tamil – but language differences were at the heart of decades of civil war. Canada officially recognises both English and French, but linguistic battles in Quebec have led to decades of cultural and legal disputes. Belgium remains divided between Dutch-speaking Flanders and French-speaking Wallonia, with both having official language rights. China has Mandarin as the official language but faces internal dissent from speakers of Uyghur, Tibetan, and Mongolian. These global parallels show how language, when politicised, can lead to division rather than unity. The Maharashtra Language Row top videos View all The recent controversy in Maharashtra serves as a fresh reminder of these unresolved tensions. The state government's announcement to make Hindi a compulsory third language in schools triggered widespread protests across political and linguistic lines. Although Hindi has not traditionally faced resistance in Maharashtra, this move was seen as a top-down imposition, especially in a state where Marathi holds strong cultural significance. Sensing the growing backlash, the government was quick to roll back the decision. While officials framed it as a policy reconsideration, it was, in effect, a retreat in the face of public dissent. tags : Hindi Hindi Debate national language official language Location : Mumbai, India, India First Published: July 01, 2025, 19:01 IST News india Why Hindi Is An Official Language And Not The National Language Of India | Explained
