logo
The size of this steak at a trendy inner-city pub has sparked outrage - but not everyone agrees

The size of this steak at a trendy inner-city pub has sparked outrage - but not everyone agrees

Daily Mail​29-05-2025
Aussies have erupted over the price of a steak after an angry diner unleashed on social media about their meal at a gastropub.
A Reddit user took to the platform on Wednesday to share a photo of their dinner at Four in Hand Hotel in the ritzy inner-city Sydney suburb of Paddington.
The plate consisted of three cherry tomatoes, two sauces and a steak with a field mushroom, both appearing to be the same size.
'This is a $49 Eye Fillet from the Four in Hand, Paddington - the mushroom is larger than the steak,' they said.
'(It) ended up being a very expensive night without much to show for it.
'I just wanted a nice pub steak with chips (It didn't come with chips either).'
The post sparked a divided response on Reddit.
Some were horrified by the price while others believed it was fair in the current economic climate.
'What is this? A steak for ants? It needs to be at least… 3 times as big,' one wrote.
Another sarcastically commented: 'I for one can't believe an expensive cut of meat in the eastern suburbs is so pricey.'
A third added: 'Has no one in this sub ever bought an eye fillet before?'
Others also offered insight into why the price may not have been unreasonable.
'A few things to remember. Mushrooms can be huge. Eye fillet steaks typically have a smaller footprint compared to, say, a T-bone steak,' one wrote.
'The one in your photo is not smaller than typical footprints of these steaks (and) eye fillet steaks are more expensive.'
There were also references to the skyrocketing cost of beef in Australia, with one person saying: 'Beef pricing is f***ed at the moment.'
Farmers warned in April that Aussies could end up paying more than $50 a kilo for steak at the supermarket due to Donald Trump's tariffs on agriculture exports.
Organic beef cattle producer and Australian Food Sovereignty Alliance's spokeswoman Tammi Jonas said there has been high demand for Australian beef across the world.
The fillet steak at Four in the Hand Hotel (pictured) sits in the middle of price ranges for surrounding Paddington venues
She warned the appetite for Australian beef would increase which would subsequently impact domestic prices.
Four in Hand Hotel owner Colin Parras defended the meal price.
'Fillet steak prices are through the roof at the moment,' he told Daily Mail Australia in a statement.
'The steak in question is $49 for a 200g steak plus sides including the mushroom. This was priced lower than most similar venues in the area.
'Most venues in the area have actually taken it off menu at the moment due to the pricing.'
Research into other venues in Paddington revealed Mr Parras' pub is within the area's price range for a fillet steak.
While 180g of fillet steak with sides at The London Hotel would cost a diner $38, Ursula's Paddington offers a 180g grasslands beef fillet with sides for $61.
Mr Parras also pointed out that eye fillet steaks are 'proportionately thicker' than they are wide and that the photo on Reddit was taken from above.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man details the shocking realities of living in a remote tent in the woods after shunning modern life
Man details the shocking realities of living in a remote tent in the woods after shunning modern life

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Man details the shocking realities of living in a remote tent in the woods after shunning modern life

A man who sold his apartment to live in a tent in the woods alone has lifted a lid on his unusual lifestyle - revealing he uses baby wipes to bathe and survives off canned beans. The man, named Keith, who is in his 20s and lives in Australia, explained exclusively to the Daily Mail that the idea dawned on him after years of working tirelessly and still struggling to get by. 'No matter how many hours I worked, I'd still have nothing left at the end of the pay cycle,' he said. 'Sham contracting jobs make you liable for taxes at the end of the year.' As someone who is 'naturally introverted,' he enjoys 'solitude' and being in nature, so four months ago, he decided to leave his home and try living in the forest full time. At first he started by sleeping on the tent floor in a sleeping bag, but when he woke up 'drenched and shivering' he got creative. He bought a stretcher and started resting on that at night - and he now insists he sleeps better than he did at his apartment. 'I can sleep better in the woods than with noisy roommates,' he told the Daily Mail. The only items he has with him are some clothes, a mop to dry the floor of the tent if it rains, his sleeping bag, a portable clothesline, and 10 power banks that he uses to keep his phone charged. He sleeps at 'free legal campsites' and usually stays in the same one for a month before he is required to switch to a different campsite. He has a gym membership and goes once a month to re-charge all of his power banks. As for food, he explained that he lives off tortillas and canned beans. 'Twenty flour tortillas at $5 a pack, along with a $1 can of large canned beans (either kidney, chickpeas, lentils, baked beans) lasts me three days,' he shared on Reddit. 'I also buy high protein soy milk cartons, a carton costs me $3 and I consume them within 72 hours of opening since I don't have refrigeration. 'I also buy around 10 packets of family sized snacks (potato, corn, biscuits) for calorie bulking. 'These cost me around $2.50 each. So about $40 on snacks, plus water costs me $20 for two 24 bottled water packs. I take vitamins C, B12 and iron supplements. 'My bloodwork is normal and my BMI hovers around 19. I used to have Type 2 diabetes but it is now in remission since going on this diet.' He uses baby wipes to bathe 'every few days,' but he 'might use a smidge of hand sanitizer once a week with the baby wipes.' 'I use creek water every week or two with the biofriendly soap. I carry a bucket and bathe on the soil away from the water flow,' he added. He wears his clothes for 'three to six days' before he deems them dirty, and washes them in the river without any detergent. 'I immerse them in the flow, take them out, wring it, and repeat three times,' shared Keith. 'I wash the sleeping bag every few months at a laundromat though.' While his tent is waterproof, he said rain sometimes seeps through the seams and collects on the floor, which is why he sleeps on a raised stretcher off the ground. 'I mop up the water and occasionally spray some disinfectant on the tent fabrics during heavy rain,' he dished. As for how he uses the bathroom, he explained the campsites usually have 'drop toilets,' which are non-flush toilets that utilize a drop hole instead of water to dispose of waste. He told the Daily Mail that he has faced some life-threatening situations over the last four months of living in the woods. He said he was once worried about getting hypothermia after he 'got drenched' and once had a large branch fall off a tree and nearly hit him. 'I try to set up underneath a gap in the canopy for this reason. I also try not setting up right besides the road as a careless driver could run me over at night,' he explained. 'And [thankfully] my area stays above freezing even in winter so I just adapt.' As someone who is 'naturally introverted' he said he 'doesn't need constant social stimulation' and is happy to spend his days going on hikes. He vowed that he doesn't get lonely and is able to stay in contact with his family using his phone. He estimated that his living expenses are only $500 a month, which includes his car registration, insurance, gym membership, phone bill, food, and supplies. He lives off 'savings and welfare' and still works 'a few months in the year' to make some income, and he said the 'main benefit' so far has been cutting out his high rent. 'The benefits of this lifestyle are mainly financial, though being able to go on nice walks through the forest trials in the early morning is an underrated advantage,' he explained. While Keith knows not everyone will understand his lifestyle, in the end, he insisted that he is happier than ever. And he said he could see himself doing it 'indefinitely' as long as nothing goes astray.

The biggest voices need to admit Australia is a low-taxing nation before joining the economic reform conversation
The biggest voices need to admit Australia is a low-taxing nation before joining the economic reform conversation

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

The biggest voices need to admit Australia is a low-taxing nation before joining the economic reform conversation

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has reinvigorated the economic policy debate with all the talk now about his economic reform roundtable. Unfortunately, the biggest voices invariably are those who desire to help themselves. The other problem is the debate remains bounded in purposeful obfuscation. That is why it is very pleasing to read Acoss's new report 'Taxing income less and consumption more: The case against', which factchecks some myths about Australia's tax system. Acoss provides three points that need to be the basis of any discussion of tax. If you can't admit Australia is a low-taxing nation, then you should not get entry into any roundtable discussion on the topic. As Acoss notes, Australia is the ninth lowest taxing nation across all the advanced economies in the world. We raise less tax than every nation in the G7 except for the US. We raise less tax than South Korea, Canada, Japan, or the UK. In 2022 (the latest OECD-wide figures) the average level of tax across the OECD was 34% of GDP, while in Australia it was just 29.4% of GDP. If the graph does not display click here That's the equivalent of an extra $128bn. And sure, you might say, 'that's how it is, we can't change that'. But we change things all the time in our tax system. Paul Keating introduced capital gains tax, John Howard introduced a 50% capital gains tax discount and the GST. We used to have inheritance taxes, and then Joh Bjelke-Petersen got rid of them in 1977: If the graph does not display click here We also change our spending – we haven't always had Medicare or the NDIS. Nothing needs to only be the way it is or was. In 1970, total government tax revenue was 20.5% of GDP; within 15 years it was 27.5% of GDP – that's a bigger shift than to go from where we are now to the OECD average. Nothing is fixed. If the graph does not display click here The myth that we are a big income-taxing nation refuses to die. Independent MP Allegra Spender, for example, likes to say in her social media videos and tax 'green paper' that 'we need to lower the tax burden on working people through lowering income taxes' because we need to rebalance 'tax revenue from income taxes on labour towards other sources of tax' to ensure 'sustainability'. Except, as Acoss details, we are the seventh lowest taxer of personal income in the OECD, and the 11th lowest when you include corporate income: If the graph does not display click here As the Acoss report notes, Australia's 'share of personal income and social security taxes is 40%, below the OECD average of 50%': If the graph does not display click here Australia is less dependent on personal income taxes than every country in the G7 and yet apparently, we need to reduce our dependency even more. Even compared to our own history we're not all that dependent on private income tax: If the graph does not display click here Often talk about needing to reduce our dependency on income tax is followed by a call to increase the GST. Conservative economists like to argue a GST is the most efficient tax. Caring more about tax efficiency rather than equity is rather revealing, but even still, as Acoss notes, the GST is not actually much more efficient than income tax. They note that previous Treasury research found increasing the GST to 15% and reducing income tax to compensate 'would deliver negligible GDP gains'. The difference in efficiency of income tax and GST is so small that it would barely register in the overall economy. So, the only reason you would do it is if it was fairer. But, as Acoss finds, it is decidedly not so. Around the bottom 60% of households would be worse off from an increase in the GST to 15% combined with a 5% income tax cut. If the graph does not display click here The government could instead increase low-income benefits, but as Acoss argues, these are notoriously temporary. They note, for example, that the GST support package included '$3 per week per child family payments … together with an increase of up to $7 per week per family for sole parent families'. That was great until 'seven years later, income support for sole parents with school age children was cut by $25 per week'. So where does this leave us? The problem is not dependency on income taxes, but that we have overly generous income tax breaks for those who do not need them other than for reasons that have little economic basis. As Acoss argues, 'tax concessions for superannuation are excessively generous for people who don't need support to save for retirement' and similarly 'capital gains tax and negative gearing concessions encourage speculation in land, undermine housing affordability and divert investment from more productive purposes'. We don't need to increase the GST, but we could broaden it to include things like private health insurance and private school fees which would actually be progressive. Some in the private school sector are already getting antsy about this (as they should). And here's the thing – we don't need to only fund things with more GST – we could tax wealth and better tax gas companies and all the proceeds could go into the GST bucket that the states get. There are a lot of ways to improve the tax system, but if you can't admit the three points above, you really should admit you don't belong in the conversation. Greg Jericho is a Guardian columnist and policy director at the Centre for Future Work

Worcestershire egg tartine with lemony garlic mayo
Worcestershire egg tartine with lemony garlic mayo

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Worcestershire egg tartine with lemony garlic mayo

There is nothing quite like a ramen egg: perfectly sweet, salty and full of umami. Its satisfying jammy yolk comes from the process of marinating in a savoury liquid, soy. Everything we love about soy sauce can be found in Worcestershire sauce, so I thought I'd swap out the soy in a ramen egg. The result is addictive. When paired with skordalia, a lemony, garlicky Greek mayo, it becomes a little riff on oeufs mayonnaise. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning We use mustard greens at my restaurant Molli, in Melbourne, but any leafy greens you have in the fridge will work fine. I like to crisp one side of the bread and leave the other soft and tender so you get tonnes of texture. We also top ours with salmon roe, but this is optional. The chilli crisp adds extra punch. Though it only needs 20 minutes to prep, you'll need at least 24 hours for the eggs to marinate. Makes 4 tartines For the Worcestershire egg: 6 eggs ¾ cup Worcestershire sauce 1 cup water ¾ cup soy sauce110g brown sugar For the skordalia:200g mayonnaise, I use Kewpie 1 ½ tbsp dijon mustard 1 ½ tbsp lemon juice ½ clove garlic, grated, microplaned or chopped very fine 100g fine bread crumbs A pinch of salt For the tartine:1 bunch of greens, destemmed, washed, cut into 4cm long pieces and dried well1 tbsp oil, canola, vegetable or sunflower4 slices of good quality sourdough, cut into desired toast size 6 tsp chilli crisp Optional: 1 tsp of salmon or trout roe per slice, to garnish Sign up to Saved for Later Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips after newsletter promotion To marinate the eggs, bring water to a boil and drop in the whole eggs, cooking for exactly six minutes and 30 seconds. Once cooked, remove from the boiling water and immediately place into an ice bath until completely cold. Peel eggs and set aside. Combine Worcestershire sauce, soy sauce, water and brown sugar in a bowl and whisk until the sugar is fully dissolved. Put the eggs in a tall glass or plastic container (with a lid) and pour the Worcestershire marinade over them. It's easier to submerge the eggs when they are stacked on top of each other. Close the lid and let the eggs sit in the fridge for at least 24 hours, or up to 48 hours. The longer you leave it, the jammier the yolk and the firmer the white will get. To make the skordalia, add all ingredients together in a mixing bowl and combine. Adjust the levels of garlic and lemon to your desired seasoning, then set aside. Place a pan over medium heat, add oil and toss in the greens. Saute just until the greens wilt then remove the pan from heat and leave them to cool. Toast the bread, or gently fry in a pan with oil. Either way, you want the toast to be golden brown. To assemble, take the toasted bread and smear on a tablespoon of skordalia. Lay out the greens, making sure to cover the entire piece of toast. Cut Worcestershire eggs into quarters, then place them evenly across each piece of toast. Spoon over chilli crisp and roe, if you're using, then eat while the toast is still warm.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store