
Auckland mayor's top executive liquidating personal firm owing $570k
Brown's chief of staff Jaswant Sailendra Singh (Jazz) called in the liquidators on June 4, for his property development company Traxx Investments Limited.
The first report by liquidators Steven Knov and Kieran Jones, dated June 11, shows Traxx has no assets, and its sole creditor, listed as preferential is Inland Revenue with the sum of $569,739.
A spokesman for the mayor said in a statement provided to Newsroom at the weekend that Brown 'has never heard of Traxx Investments nor has he received any advice about Jazz Singh's involvement with this company.'
Singh told Newsroom his employer, Auckland Council, was not aware of the liquidation, which he described as 'unrelated altogether' to his work there.
He said the existence of his business interest had been declared to the council, but not the liquidation.
Asked about the circumstances leading to the liquidation, he said 'I don't plan on talking to you about that.'
He said the liquidation was a voluntary thing which his advisors had told him to do.
In the liquidators' first report it said 'the liquidators have been advised that the reason for the failure of the company, which led to the appointment of the liquidators, is due to the company having insufficient assets to satisfy its liabilities.'
The report said they had yet to receive a claim from Inland Revenue.
Singh is the chief of staff in the mayor's office, and technically an Auckland Council staffer. Photo: Auckland Mayor's office
The role of chief of staff is the most senior position in the Auckland mayor's office and Singh has travelled overseas on occasions with Brown, and is one of the lead officials in discussions with the government and external entities. For example, one push by Auckland and other councils is to convince the central government to return a share of GST to local government.
Singh, previously a solicitor, has held senior management roles at Auckland Council for 14 years, and has been in the mayor's office for most of this term.
He was initially the head of Budget and Finance for the mayor, and became chief of staff in June 2024. Previously he had held roles in the council as general manager of procurement, head of risk, and manager of property and commercial legal services.
Singh is the sole director, and co-owner of Traxx Development Limited, and Traxx Property Investments Limited, with Companies Office records showing the other shareholder in both as Paul Michael Davies.
When Singh was made chief or staff, Brown was full of praise on Facebook:
'I'm pleased to announce that Jazz Singh will be my new chief of staff.
'As well as being a strong family man and a father of six, he's got strong business smarts and will be the first finance person in the role since the formation of the super city.
'Jazz is my current head of finance and budget and has played a key part in my long-term plan. He's well placed to deliver on my manifesto, bring the CCOs into line and stop wasting money!
'I'm glad he's agreed to lead my office's strong and capable team.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Wellington City Councillors more complained about than elected officials in other main centres
The council confirmed the complaints relate to city councillors, not community board members. Wellington City Councillors meeting at their chambers on The Terrace. Photo / Mark Mitchell. The council said complaints are handled with 'strict confidentiality, ensuring that employees feel supported and empowered to raise concerns without fear of disclosure'. Further requests for more detail on the complaints, including the names of the councillors involved, was denied by the council because of privacy. While different authorities record complaints in different ways, Wellington councillors received twice as many complaints as their Christchurch counterparts, the council with the second highest number. None of the three complaints raised by council officials about elected members at Christchurch City Council this term was escalated further. Christchurch City Councillors meeting at their premises on Hereford St. Photo / George Heard 'All three of these complaints never made it past notification, with staff choosing not to continue with the formal complaint process before they could be formally investigated and the claims substantiated.' Christchurch City Council would not provide any detail on the nature of the complaints. Auckland Council recorded two official complaints initiated by staff, both against local board members. A complaint was laid against Rodney Local Board member Geoff Upson by an Auckland Transport staff member regarding alleged offensive comments made about staff online. The council said it was resolved through mediation and no breach of the council's code of conduct was recorded. Auckland Council. Photo / Newstalk ZB Matt Winiata, a Manurewa Local Board member also faced a complaint by a parks staff member regarding alleged 'offensive comments in correspondence to staff', Auckland Council said. 'One aspect of the complaint was upheld and determined to be a non-material breach of the Code.' Other elements were not upheld as Winiata had already apologised. 'The Conduct Commissioner's recommendation was directed to the Chief Executive and staff, and no further action was required from the member', the council said. Why is Wellington City Council the worst? Tensions at Wellington City Council reached boiling point last year during a controversial debate on the proposed sale of its 34% share in Wellington airport. Traditional party voting blocs were broken and the council ultimately voted against a sale – upending the Long Term Plan (LTP). The Long Term Plan process also saw tensions rise between councillors and staff, with some around the council table questioning the quality of advice supplied by officers. Former Local Government Minister Simeon Brown intervened with the appointment of Crown observer Lindsay McKenzie. Mayor Tory Whanau said the process had brought out the worst behaviour of council members. Since his appointment, McKenzie has noted tensions in the relationships between councillors and staff. Lindsay McKenzie. Photo / Supplied. In his first report in December last year McKenzie said some elected members were concerned about the quality and timeliness of information they received ahead of making decisions. He said a few were concerned about biases in officers' reports and advice. McKenzie noted the way the council provided information to elected members was 'as thorough as one could expect'. He said his own appointment as a Crown observer had 'moderated' much of the conduct that has called the council into question. Mayor Tory Whanau also said at the time McKenzie's presence had helped her colleagues work more collaboratively. Mayor Tory Whanau at a Wellington City Council meeting. Photo / Mark Mitchell. Responding to the fact her council has recorded the most complaints, Whanau acknowledged she had seen instances of poor conduct from councillors. 'There is no doubt that the conduct by some councillors this term has not been what Wellingtonians would expect. Both to each other and staff', Whanau said. Whanau would not say whether she was the subject of any staff complaints. Reports of anti-social behaviour towards the council's frontline staff increased by a reported 323% in the past five years, rising from around 400 reports each year pre-covid to almost 1000 annually, the council announced in May. Ethan Manera is a New Zealand Herald journalist based in Wellington. He joined NZME in 2023 as a broadcast journalist with Newstalk ZB and is interested in local issues, politics, and property in the capital. Ethan can be emailed at


Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Luxon defends voting changes
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. The Prime Minister says the public still have plenty of time to get enrolled to vote despite scrapping same-day enrolment for elections. Last week the government announced legislation to overhaul electoral laws it said had become "unsustainable". The government agreed to close enrolment before advance voting begins, with people needing to enrol or update their details by midnight on the Sunday before advance voting starts on the Monday morning (in other words, 13 days before election day). The legislation sets a requirement of 12 days advance voting at each election, and the changes would mean special vote processing could get underway sooner. On Monday morning, Newsroom reported Attorney-General Judith Collins, had said the proposed law changes clashed with constitutional rights in a report. She indicated 100,000 or more people could be directly or indirectly disenfranchised by rules banning enrolment in the final 13 days before an election. Collins declined an interview with RNZ on the issue. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said Collins had a statutory responsibility to review legislation to make sure it was consistent with the bill of rights. "As a government we think enrolment should happen before early voting starts," he said. Luxon pointed to Australia as an example of a country that does not allow enrolment on the same day as voting. "We want everyone to participate but it's just done two weeks before elections day. It's not uncommon, it gives people plenty of time to get enrolled and get sorted. "All we're saying is we want everybody to participate in our democracy... not an unreasonable request." On Election Day 2023 110,000 people enrolled to vote or updated their details.


NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
KiwiSaver hardship reveals hidden cost of this economic downturn
We had news last week that KiwiSaver members withdrew more than $470 million for hardship reasons in the past 12 months amid continuing economic stress. Inland Revenue figures showed $470.7m was taken out of KiwiSaver in the June financial year, up 56.6% from $300.5m over the prior period. Looking back through the figures, there has certainly been a big spike in withdrawals in the past two years, but they have been on the rise for several years. Since Covid, both the number of people withdrawing funds and the amount withdrawn have risen steadily. As a barometer of the general economic situation, that isn't great. But the bigger problem with these hardship withdrawals is that the ultimate cost is (quite literally) compounded through the years. More than $1.3 billion of KiwiSaver funds has been withdrawn for hardship reasons in the past five years. If we do some back-of-the-envelope calculations and assume this money could have earned around 7% returns for the next 20 years, then we get a figure of more than $5b that will be missing from the nation's pool of retirement funds by 2045. Given the current trend of withdrawals, I suspect this is a conservative estimate. I understand why we allow withdrawals for hardship. It doesn't make sense for people to lose their homes or to go hungry when they have thousands of dollars sitting in a KiwiSaver account, so I'm not advocating that we stop allowing the withdrawals. However, there is a hidden cost and the situation highlights just how crucial it is for the Government to put more focus on retirement savings. There is a lot more money coming out of the KiwiSaver scheme to fund people into their first homes. Since Covid hit, an average of about $1.2b a year has been withdrawn from KiwiSaver for first home purchases. A home is an asset at least, and home ownership is an important step on the path to financial independence. I suspect we just have to accept the first home buyer withdrawals as a feature of the KiwiSaver scheme. If young people are in the scheme from the start of their working life and have $10,000 or $20,000 to put towards a house deposit, they are probably ahead of where many in my generation were at the same age. But the reality is that as a nation, we're well behind on where we need to be with our retirement savings. According to Stats NZ projections, the percentage of the population aged 65+ will increase from roughly 16-17% in the early 2020s to about 19-20% by 2030. By 2050, around 24-26% of New Zealanders are expected to be 65+. The old-age dependency ratio (ratio of elderly to working-age population) is expected to nearly double between 2020 and 2050. Our annual superannuation bill already comes in at more than $20b, and Treasury has projected that to rise to about $45b by 2037. According to Budget 2025 data, New Zealand Superannuation costs $4352 per person per year, making it the third-largest area of government spending after welfare ($6181 per person) and health ($5804 per person). From the Treasury's long-term fiscal projections, spending on NZ Super is projected to grow from 4.3% of GDP in 2010 to 7.9% in 2060, an increase of 3.6 percentage points. It is also rising as a percentage of the Government's total tax revenue – from about 17% now, it is projected to rise above 21% by 2037. So we know we have a problem. It seems almost certain that the age of superannuation will have to be raised to 67 in the coming years – despite the current opposition of NZ First and Labour. Future governments will almost certainly come under more pressure to means-test. KiwiSaver, which currently has total funds of $122b, is one of our great hopes. But the total figure is flattering. There are more than three million KiwiSaver members so the average fund size is just $37,000. Hopefully, that will be skewed by a lot of young people who will see their savings grow dramatically in the next decades. That brings us back to the downside of withdrawing funds early for hardship, though. We need to be saving more, not less. Moves by the Government to lift the default contribution rate for both employees and employers to 4% from April 2028 were a step in the right direction. However, they pale in comparison to Australia's compulsory scheme, which requires 12% employer contributions. The scheme has the equivalent of $4.5 trillion invested, making Australia the fifth-largest holder of pension fund assets in the world, not per capita but in nominal terms. Australia, for the record, also allows people to withdraw funds for hardship, but one suspects fewer people there need to. If we want to make the most of the KiwiSaver scheme we have, we need to look more closely at who is withdrawing their money and why. Meanwhile, young Kiwis are voting with their feet and joining the Australian Superannuation scheme ... by virtue of moving to work there. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.