
How TikTok's ‘#morningshed' went viral
The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.
Welcome to the tyranny of #morningshed, the viral TikTok trend in which creators apply multiple, increasingly absurd layers of skincare products, masks and accessories before bed, hoping to uncover a flawless complexion when they peel them away the following morning. We aren't talking about the (comparatively simple) serums and essences that made up the once-popular 12-step Korean-inspired routines. Now, it's chinstraps to 'lift' the jawline, hydrogel masks infused with 'ultra-low molecular collagen' to smooth, and adhesive tape applied to the skin to restrict wrinkling. I was going to liken it to Patrick Bateman's morning routine in American Psycho, but having rewatched that scene, his gel cleanser, exfoliating scrub and face mask ritual feels decidedly lower maintenance.
According to Dr Anjali Mahto, consultant dermatologist and founder of the Self London clinic, the morning shedding trend is based more on performative productivity than it is skincare science. 'There is growing pressure to curate every aspect of modern life – to present not just a polished appearance, but a polished process,' she says. 'Skincare has not been spared, and these increasingly complex night-time rituals often go beyond what the skin physiologically requires, and instead reflect a broader cultural compulsion toward perfection.'
There's something pretty dystopian about the image of these young women rising mummy-like from their beds – where presumably they have to sleep on their backs to ensure their masks, straps and gadgets stay in place – to begin the laborious process of 'shedding' each morning. And the more formidable the routine, the more views the video gets. As TikTok creator Ashley West declared to her 1 million followers: 'The uglier you go to bed, the hotter you wake up' – a depressingly popular 'affirmation' for the trend. And that's before we even get on to the popularity of mouth tape, which involves sealing your mouth shut to promote nose breathing instead – apparently resulting in better sleep and less snoring. Nose breathing can offer benefits, according to Harvard Health Publishing, but the organisation warns against using mouth tape to achieve it, citing 'hampered breathing' and 'significantly reduced' oxygen levels as potential risks. The symbolism is almost too on the nose. It feels as though, in many ways, we're still as beholden to the idea of having to suffer for beauty as we ever were.
Not only that, but is all of this effort actually achieving anything? Take face taping, a practice that uses kinesiology tape to restrict muscle movement and prevent lines forming in key areas such as between the eyebrows – referred to as 11 lines – the outer corners of the eyes, and between the nose and mouth. In theory, it sounds faintly plausible, but Mahto explains that the mechanisms of ageing are far more complex. 'Wrinkles are not just about movement, they involve collagen loss, changes in fat distribution … Taping cannot reverse or prevent those processes.' What it can do is irritate the skin, she says, especially with repeated application. 'At best, it offers a fleeting sense of control. At worst, it disrupts the barrier and causes unnecessary inflammation.'
Dermatologists are similarly dismissive of single-use collagen gel masks, which appear opaque white on application but are transparent by morning, when the ingredients are said to have absorbed into the skin.
'Not only is there an environmental impact, but there's also no solid evidence that applying collagen topically replenishes the body's own collagen stores,' says consultant dermatologist Dr Cristina Psomadakis, who is the medical director of prescription skincare brand Klira. And don't get her started on the cocktail of different serums influencers layer on underneath the masks – retinoids, acids and other powerful actives applied with an alarmingly liberal hand. 'I think most dermatologists will tell you the biggest problem they see is people overdoing it by following skin trends, or layering on products that should not be combined.'
In many ways, it's human nature to be drawn to products and rituals presented as offering an instant transformative effect. The skincare industry isn't booming for nothing. But as always, it's the slightly boring but ultimately reassuring less-is-more approach that actually works. 'The best thing you can do at night is wash off the remains of the day, including your face sunscreen, or makeup that can clog your pores,' says Psomadakis. 'Most dermatologists have a very simple skincare routine consisting of a cleanser, moisturiser, sunscreen, and usually a prescription treatment at night.'
The idea of having separate products for day and night is not all marketing spin, according to Mahto. 'At night, the skin becomes more permeable, meaning it absorbs active ingredients more efficiently. Blood flow increases, repair processes accelerate, and water loss peaks,' she says. 'So yes, there is some genuine science behind using particular products in the evening. Anything that increases skin sensitivity, like retinoids or exfoliating acids, is usually better applied at night, when the skin is not being exposed to UV or environmental pollutants.'
Sign up to Fashion Statement
Style, with substance: what's really trending this week, a roundup of the best fashion journalism and your wardrobe dilemmas solved
after newsletter promotion
At the end of the day though, all of this is optional. And, ironically, one of the best things you can do for your skin is to stop scrolling TikTok into the early hours and get plenty of sleep (ideally unencumbered by chinstraps and mouth tape). Since we live in an era in which young girls are waking at 4.30am to begin their extensive skincare routines, and poor self-esteem issues in tweens are being linked to the use of social media beauty filters, don't we owe it to ourselves to exercise a bit of restraint on the beauty front?
To read the complete version of this newsletter – complete with this week's trending topics in The Measure and your wardrobe dilemmas solved – subscribe to receive Fashion Statement in your inbox every Thursday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
NHS facing £27bn bill for maternity failings in England
The NHS could be facing a £27.4bn bill for maternity failings in England, an NHS annual report has revealed. It comes after several hospital scandals caused hundreds of babies and women to die or suffer life-altering conditions sparking a record number of legal claims. The potential bill for maternity negligence since 2019 is £27.4bn, according to an NHS Resolution report, the organisation that handles negligence claims for the NHS trusts in England. Hospital scandals in England have prompted health secretary Wes Streeting to launch a national investigation into NHS maternity services. The new rapid investigation will look at 'systemic' failures in maternity and neo-natal units 'up and down the country', which are leaving women and babies at a 'considerably higher' risk than they should be. The probe will focus on the 10 'worst performing' maternity services in England in a bid to drive urgent improvements to safety for pregnant women and their babies, Mr Streeting said. The NHS Resolution report which was published on Thursday revealed in 2024/25 the NHS paid out £3.1bn in compensation and associated costs overall. But because claims take some time to be reported and settled, and some claims are settled with multi-year payments into the future as Periodical Payment Orders (PPOs), the estimated 'annual cost of harm' for NHS schemes was £4.9 billion. This means almost £5 billion in compensation costs is currently incurred by the NHS in England each year for incidents that could be avoided. The estimates cost of harm from maternity incidents in 2019/20 was £5.7bn, £5.1bn in 2020/21, £8.2bn in 2021/22, £3.4 in 2022/23 and £2.5bn in both 2023/24 and 4024/25, the Guardian reported. This estimated cost is far higher than the NHS budget of £18bn for newborns over the past six years. Jeremy Hunt, the former Conservative health secretary, told the Guardian: 'It should be a matter of national shame that we now spend more on maternity litigation than the total cost of running maternity services.' However, compensation for maternity negligence only accounts for a fraction of the total £17.4bn sum, with a large share going towards legal costs. Over the past six years £24.6m has been spent on legal fees for claims that did not result in damages. Liberal Democrat hospitals spokesperson Jess Brown-Fuller said these figures show how much damage the crisis in maternity services is causing the NHS. She told the newspaper: 'The crisis in our maternity services is being laid bare through the trauma that so many families have to deal with.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'This government inherited an unacceptable situation where too many families have suffered due to failures in maternity care and the NHS has been paying billions for its mistakes, rather than fixing them. 'We are committed to breaking that cycle and providing mothers and babies with safe, compassionate care once and for all. That is why we have announced a rapid national maternity investigation to identify where things are going wrong and identify solutions.' A spokesperson also said it is setting up a National Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce, rolling out a digital system to better identify safety concerns, and a new training programme to help prevent avoidable injuries at childbirth. An NHS England spokesperson said: "We recognise that too many women and families are not receiving the high-quality maternity care they deserve, and we are committed to changing this. "We are taking immediate steps to strengthen maternity services, including closer oversight of underperforming trusts, and will work with the independent investigation to ensure we learn from its findings and deliver the comprehensive changes that women and families need and deserve.' NHS Resolution said: 'The high cost of compensation arising in maternity comes from a small number of very serious incidents resulting in brain injury to a baby at birth. These incidents are devastating for families and reflect the need to make provision for life-long and complex care needs. 'NHS Resolution is committed to supporting the Government's action to drive improvements in maternal and neonatal safety. 'Our Early Notification Scheme enables an earlier investigation of compensation entitlement than has been possible in the past and for learning to be shared back more rapidly with NHS trusts. Additionally, our Maternity Incentive Scheme provides financial incentives to NHS trusts to embed safety standards. We continue to evaluate and enhance these programmes to improve outcomes for families and reduce preventable harm."


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Gascoigne 'doing well' after hospital stay
Former England and Spurs midfielder Paul Gascoigne is "doing well" after a short stay in hospital, his representatives have 58-year-old was admitted to hospital after visiting the accident and emergency department on agency, MNT, said in a statement: "Paul voluntarily went to A&E on Friday (not via ambulance) after struggling with a throat condition he has had for a while. He went home yesterday after a short stay and is resting up and doing well."The Sun, external had claimed on Sunday that Gascoigne had been "rushed" to an intensive care unit after he was found by a friend. Gascoigne was capped 57 times by his country and is widely regarded as one of the greatest footballers England has ever began his career playing for boyhood club Newcastle United, before a move to Spurs in 1988 - where he won the FA Cup in then signed for Lazio before returning to the UK where he played for Rangers, Middlesbrough and from the pitch, Gascoigne has had well-documented struggles with alcohol addiction and depression since retiring in 2004.


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Junior doctors' strike to go ahead after talks fail
A five-day strike by junior doctors will go ahead from Friday after talks failed. The British Medical Association (BMA) is pushing for pay increases of 29 per cent, having already secured such a boost under the Labour Government. The walkouts by up to 30,000 medics will be the first national strike by a healthcare union under a Labour administration since the winter of discontent in 1979. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, opened talks with the BMA last week, since when health and union officials have been locked in discussions. Mr Streeting has said the Government will not negotiate on pay, but was prepared to make changes to improve working conditions. But on Tuesday afternoon, the BMA said the strikes would go ahead.