JSK – Janaki Vs State of Kerala row: K.C. Venugopal slams Suresh Gopi's silence
According to sources, the film was denied certification because the name 'Janaki' – another name for goddess Sita — was used for the lead character, a woman fighting a legal battle after being assaulted.
"We've heard actor and Union Minister Suresh Gopi say many times that cinema is his lifeblood – like rice is to daily sustenance. Yet, even as a system he is part of throws mud onto that very rice, he remains silent," Mr. Venugopal wrote in a Facebook post.
The Alappuzha MP urged Mr. Gopi, an actor-turned politician, to break his silence and speak up for his own film and for his fellow artistes.
Mr. Venugopal accused the censor board of attacking artistic freedom.
"The stance taken by the censor board sets fire to the very foundation of freedom of expression," he said.
"In cinema and literature, creators have the constitutional freedom to choose titles and names. Denying that is an insult to the Constitution itself," he said.
Mr. Venugopal pointed out that names such as Ram, Krishna, Sita, and Radha have been used for decades in Indian films, and many popular movies have carried similar names.
"Most personal names in India come from Hindu mythology," he said, adding that the Congress governments never allowed the censor board to act in ways that undermined its credibility.
He expressed full support for the film and its makers.
"Every censor board member who imposed cuts in the name of narrow-minded politics should study the Constitution and the country's history," the Congress leader said.
Venugopal also raised concerns over the larger trend.
"Even the Mohanlal-starrer Empuraan had to undergo cuts after being screened in theatres," he said.
'Declared agenda'
"Where is the BJP taking this country? What kind of fear is forcing artistes to censor their own creations?" Mr. Venugopal asked and demanded that the Central government and the departments concerned clearly state their position.
"The government's continued silence, even after the matter reached the courts, is suspicious," he said.
"This appears to be a declared agenda – controlling food, clothing, names, and now even art," the AICC general secretary alleged.
Meanwhile, the Kerala High Court on Wednesday said it would watch the film on July 5 before deciding on the censor board's demand to change the name 'Janaki'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India-US talks: Chouhan says govt will adjust duties to ban apple imports
Amid the ongoing India-US trade talks, Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan stated that the Narendra Modi government will adjust duties to make imported apples more expensive and encourage domestic demand. He was addressing a group of students, farmers, and scientists in Jammu and Kashmir today. Jammu and Kashmir is a hub for apple trade in India, and together with neighbouring Himachal Pradesh, accounts for almost 97 per cent of the approximately 2.4–2.5 million tonnes of apples grown domestically. The United States, in the ongoing bilateral trade talks with India, has been pressing for greater access to the domestic market for its agricultural produce, with apples being one of the items. India currently imposes around 50 per cent duty on apples imported from the US, a rate that was even higher just a few years ago. The US seeks a reduction in duties to facilitate easier access to the Indian market. He further added that instructions have been issued to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) to conduct more research aimed at improving the yield of apples grown in India. Chouhan also stated that he would discuss with the Railway Ministry to ensure that apples from Jammu and Kashmir are efficiently transported to all parts of India. Recently, apple growers from Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand, and Himachal Pradesh had met with the chief ministers of their respective states to jointly approach the central government. Their aim was to ensure that no unreasonable changes are made to the tariff structure for apples imported from the US as part of the trade deal. "Since 2001, India's apple imports have climbed from 200,000 tonnes to 600,000 tonnes, increasing from 1.7 per cent to 22.5 per cent of domestic production. Foreign apples from the US and other countries are out-competing our domestic fruit, putting the livelihoods of more than 800,000 apple-growing households at risk," a statement from the Apple Farmers' Federation of India (AFFI), representing apple growers from Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand, said a few days ago.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Krishna Janmabhoomi: HC junks plea to rename mosque as 'disputed structure'
In the ongoing legal battle over the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah site in Mathura, the Allahabad High Court on Thursday dismissed a plea requesting that the term 'Shahi Idgah Mosque' be replaced with 'disputed structure' in all future proceedings related to the case, according to a LiveLaw report. Responding to the High Court's decision, Advocate Saurabh Tiwari told ANI, "The High Court has rejected the application of considering it as the disputed structure... The court has said that it is a normal application and not a shock to the Hindu community..." The order was passed by Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, who stated that the application was being dismissed 'at this stage'. A total of 18 cases are currently pending in the High Court. These petitions largely seek the removal of what are described as illegal encroachments on the premises of the Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi temple, which includes the Shahi Idgah Mosque. Krishna Janmabhoomi case: Background The legal conflict revolves around claims that the Shahi Idgah Mosque was built on the site believed to be the birthplace of Lord Krishna. Hindu petitioners allege that the mosque, situated next to the Krishna Janmabhoomi temple, was constructed during Mughal emperor Aurangzeb's rule after demolishing a pre-existing Hindu temple. In 1968, a compromise was signed between the Shri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan — the temple's management body — and the Trust Shahi Masjid Eidgah. This agreement allowed both religious places to function side by side on the same premises. However, several fresh petitions have questioned the legality of this agreement. The pleas argue that the 1968 compromise was made fraudulently and is not valid under the law. Claiming the right to worship at the site, many petitioners have demanded the removal of the Shahi Idgah Mosque. Brief timeline of legal proceedings In May 2023, the Allahabad High Court transferred all pending cases related to the Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah dispute from the Mathura court to itself. However, this order was challenged in the Supreme Court by the mosque committee, and later also by the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board, LiveLaw reported. Later in December 2023, the High Court allowed a plea for the appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the Shahi Idgah Mosque premises. In January 2024, the Supreme Court stayed the implementation of that inspection order. The stay has since been extended. Plea to include Radha Rani as a party rejected In May 2024, the Allahabad High Court rejected a plea seeking to include goddess Radha as a party to one of the 18 suits related to the title dispute. The application argued that Shriji Radha Rani should be made a joint holder of the disputed 13.37-acre land along with the plaintiff deity, Sri Bhagwan Krishna Lala Virajman. The plea, filed by Advocate Reena N Singh, claimed that Radha Rani is 'the legal wife and the feminine form of the plaintiff in suit — Sri Bhagwan Krishna Lala Virajman — and that together, they both are worshipped as deities since time immemorial.' However, the court turned down the request. Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra remarked, 'Puranic illustrations are considered hearsay evidence.' The court further said, 'The claim of the applicant as a joint holder of property in dispute together with plaintiff is based on some reference in various Puranas and Sanhitas wherein Shriji Radha Rani is considered as the soul of Lord Krishna.' During the hearing on May 23, the court noted that the Pauranic depictions 'are usually based on narrative and not on direct observation or testimony'.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
CJI Gavai vows full transparency in collegium, no compromise on merit
Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai on Friday assured to infuse "complete transparency" in the collegium system of appointment of judges, wherein merit will never be compromised and all sections of society will get representation. The CJI, who was sworn in as the 52nd Chief Justice of India last month, was speaking at the Bombay High Court in an event organised by the Bombay Bar Association to honour his elevation to the highest judicial position in the country. CJI Gavai said since his predecessor Justice Sanjeev Khanna was the CJI, the collegium has tried to infuse more transparency in matters of appointments. He added that SC Justice Dipankar Datta previously at an event in Nagpur last week spoke about interference in the working of the collegium. "I assure everyone, we will adopt a procedure of complete transparency. Merit will never be compromised. We will have representatives from all sections of society. Names of all recommended will be followed up," the CJI said. He further said that when his name was recommended in 2019 for elevation to the Supreme Court, one judge in the collegium was not in favour of the same. "Last six years, I kept this as a secret when my name was doing rounds for SC, one of the collegium judges had some reservations," Gavai said, refusing to name the judge. This judge felt that if I am elevated, then there may be unrest among some senior lawyers in Mumbai, CJI Gavai said. "However, several senior lawyers from the Bombay Bar Association met this judge in Delhi and told him that he was under a wrong impression," he added. "I will always be indebted to the Bombay Bar Association as my elevation to the Supreme Court at that point of time and thereafter as CJI would never have been possible," CJI Gavai said. He emphasised that the duty of a judge is to always do justice and uphold the Constitution and that he has always attempted to do so. CJI Gavai said when he was appointed as the CJI, he refused to give any interviews to the media or speak about any roadmap. "Rather than speaking now, I felt I should let my work speak for me six months later when I retire. I do not want to make empty promises and leave room for any disappointments," he said. The CJI added that he also wants to dispel the misconception that the Supreme Court is a CJI-centric court. "SC is a court of all judges. CJI is only the first among equals," he said.
