BJP MP slams government for ‘misgovernance'
Gurupura: Accusing the Congress-led Karnataka government of undermining the state's development and ignoring the welfare of the poor, Dakshina Kannada MP Capt. Brijesh Chowta said the BJP would not rest until a mass movement is built to remove what he called an 'anti-people' administration from power.
Speaking at a dharna protest organised by the BJP in front of the Gurupura Gram Panchayat office on Monday, MP Chowta criticised the state government for 'rampant corruption, maladministration, and centralisation of power.' He claimed the public was already feeling the impact of poor governance and that the state was nearing an 'emergency-like situation' under the Congress.
'The decentralisation of power was a core vision of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and a key aspect of the Indian Constitution. But this corrupt Congress government has weakened local governance structures from the gram panchayat to municipal corporations,' Chowta said. He alleged that powers earlier held by local bodies, such as issuing uniform land-use maps (9/11 forms), have been transferred to urban development authorities, making it difficult for ordinary citizens to build homes on single plots.
He also accused the government of intentionally complicating simple procedures to encourage middlemen and bribe-taking. 'They lured voters with free schemes and guarantees, but are now clawing back hard-earned money from the public using indirect means,' he said. Recalling the BJP government's past achievements, Chowta noted that thousands of houses had been sanctioned for the economically weaker sections through gram panchayats. 'But under the current Congress regime, not even a single house has been handed over to the poor,' he said.
He also alleged that the government has begun reducing the number of beneficiaries under social welfare programmes such as Sandhya Suraksha and old-age pension schemes, pushing many elderly citizens into distress.
The MP further criticised the deteriorating law and order situation in the state, citing the recent killing of a Hindu activist in Dakshina Kannada district as evidence. 'Loot and corruption have taken over every department, and the state's financial health is worsening under this administration,' he claimed.
Following the protest, a BJP delegation led by MP Chowta and Gurupura BJP Shakti Kendra President Srikar V. Shetty submitted a memorandum to Panchayat Development Officer Pankaja Shetty, listing their grievances and demands for action.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
14 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘Super premium frequent flier PM' off on 5-nation jaunt: Congress jabs Modi ahead of visit
Taking a swipe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi ahead of his visit abroad, the Congress on Tuesday (July 1, 2025) said the "frequent flier PM" is off on a 5-nation "jaunt" and alleged that he is running away from four issues, including the Manipur situation and US President Donald Trump's claims about bringing about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh also alleged that the Prime Minister is running away from the "revelations by defence officials that India suffered reverses in the first two days of Operation Sindoor because of the PM's decisions". Prime Minister Modi will embark on a five-nation tour beginning July 2 to participate in the BRICS Summit in Brazil and expand India's ties with several key nations of the Global South. When the going gets tough, the self-styled toughs get going. The Super Premium Frequent Flier PM is off on a 5-nation, 8-day jaunt. He is running away from at least 4 issues that are agitating the nation - 1. Manipur, which he has not visited ever since the double engine in… — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) July 1, 2025 "When the going gets tough, the self-styled toughs get going. The Super Premium Frequent Flier PM is off on a 5-nation, 8-day jaunt," Mr. Ramesh said in a post on X. He is running away from at least four issues that are agitating the nation, Mr. Ramesh said. Mr. Ramesh alleged that the PM is running away from Manipur, "which he has not visited ever since the double engine in the state got derailed and ever since normal life in the state has got totally destroyed". The Congress leader claimed that PM Modi is also running away from revelations by defence officials that India suffered reverses in the first two days of Operation Sindoor "because of the PM's decisions". His remarks were an apparent reference to the reported comments of India's defence attache to Indonesia. However, the Indian embassy in Indonesia, in a post on X on Sunday, had said that the defence attache's remarks have been "quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker". Mr. Ramesh also claimed that the PM is running away from the continued claims by President Trump that he effected a ceasefire between India and Pakistan using the trade deal as a carrot and stick. He further alleged that the PM is running away from "the continued failure to bring the Pahalgam terrorists to justice even after 70 days". "The failure is all the more glaring given they may have been earlier involved in terror attacks in Poonch (Dec 2023) and Gagangir & Gulmarg (Oct 2024)," Mr. Ramesh said. Besides Brazil, Modi will visit Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina, Brazil, and Namibia during the eight-day trip, according to the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). In the first leg of the visit, Mr. Modi will undertake a visit to Ghana from July 2 to 3. From Ghana, Mr. Modi will travel to Trinidad and Tobago on a two-day visit from July 3 to 4. In the third leg of his visit, Mr. Modi will visit Argentina from July 4 to 5. In the fourth leg of his visit, Mr. Modi will travel to Brazil at the invitation of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The Prime Minister will visit Brazil from July 5 to 8 to attend the 17th BRICS Summit followed by a state visit. In the final leg of his visit, Mr. Modi will travel to Namibia.
Hans India
14 minutes ago
- Hans India
Odisha BJP chief poll put on hold
Bhubaneswar: Hours after initiating a process for the election of its Odisha unit chief, the BJP on Sunday put it on hold in view of a stampede during the Rath Yatra festivities in Puri. Three persons, including two women, were killed and over 50 others injured in the stampede near Shree Gundicha temple early on Sunday. Balasore MP Pratap Chandra Sarangi, who has been appointed as the State returning officer for the party's organisational poll, said that the election for both State president and national council members from Odisha has been 'put on hold'. An unfortunate incident took place in Puri, and three devotees lost their lives, and many others are undergoing treatment, Sarangi said. 'Such a tragic incident has disturbed all of us. We express our deepest condolences to the families of the deceased devotees,' he said. 'In view of the stampede, the elections of the State president and national council members from Odisha, which were scheduled to be held on July 1, have been put on hold,' he said. Information about the election will be shared later, said Sarangi.
The Wire
14 minutes ago
- The Wire
Trump's Extortionary Demands Recall the East India Company's Modus Operandi
US President Donald Trump is aiming for a trade agreement which can safely be called extortionary. It resembles the East India Company's success in turning India into a permanent colony for more than 200 years. Whether India will acquiesce – like Canada, which removed its 3% digital services tax on major tech firms on June 30 to restart trade talks with Washington – remains to be seen. Though the US Code refers to 'trade agreement ' 341 times, trade executive agreements or mini trade rent-seeking deals under American trade law jurisprudence require a prior authorisation or approval from Congress through the trade promotion authority (TPA). Regardless of the form of agreement, Congress must authorise the conclusion of a binding agreement so to enable requisite changes requisite legal changes. Of course, the Indian Vishwaguru went ahead into talks with the Trump administration after prime minister Narendra Modi held discussions with Trump on February 13. The Indian government even boasted of signing a $ 500-billion agreement with little or no preparation. Later, India's much-hyped 'big, good, beautiful ' trade agreement with the United States seemingly made halting progress when it now appears to be teetering following a sudden realisation in New Delhi about the potentially damaging implications of Washington's regulatory and market access demands. Chief among them – allowing unfettered entry of American genetically modified (GM) agricultural products into the Indian market and removal all regulatory barriers, India, with a population of 1.4 billion and over 700 million smallholding farmers (with farms less than three hectares), is understandably sensitive to these pressures. Yet, this "wake-up call" comes despite longstanding knowledge that the US would push aggressively to pry open India's markets – especially for its heavily subsidised, GM-laden agricultural exports, which have already been rebuffed by nations like Australia, the European Union, and China. Worryingly, institutions like NITI Aayog and some of its key agricultural advisors appear to be endorsing the American GMO agenda. This, despite clear evidence that such products, through cross-pollination and cultivation, could irreversibly damage India's diverse agricultural sector. Mexico, one of America's largest trading partners, has persistently cautioned against the use and import of GMO crops, emphasising the long-term risks. The current finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, who as commerce minister in 2015 did not defend India's demand for a permanent solution to public stockholding at the WTO's 10th Ministerial Conference in Nairobi now seems to recognise that trade negotiations cannot be initiated on the back of non-tariff issues. Yet, the damage may already be underway. Successive commerce ministers in the BJP-led government have struggled to secure substantial gains in trade negotiations and have often appeared to concede ground under pressure. India is already facing a slew of US tariffs: a universal 10% basic tariff, 25% tariffs on steel, aluminium, automobiles, and auto-components, and an upcoming tariff on pharmaceutical exports which is particularly damaging, given India's strength as a global supplier of generics. If India fails to comply with US demands by the July 9 deadline, it may face an additional 26% reciprocal tariff. Trump has stated that countries failing to finalise trade deals will receive formal letters outlining tariff penalties. Some of the tariffs already put in place by the Trump administration could rob off export revenue worth tens of billions of dollars, even though India's overall trade surplus is just about $ 44 billion. The only figment of hope is that the US will turn India into a major supplier of several items while breaking the Chinese domination of supply chains. NTBs a monster American commerce secretary Howard Lutnick has repeatedly labeled India's non-tariff barriers a ' monster,' insisting that high tariffs are just one part of India's complex regulatory web. As the pressure mounts, India is realising that contemporary trade negotiations are being broadened to include sustainability clauses, carbon taxes, government procurement rules, gender and labour standards – areas traditionally excluded from trade pacts. 'We just can't walk into it,' a senior Indian official commented. 'India is an emerging economy with specific domestic needs.' We had repeatedly raised these alarm bells. Today, it seems the chickens are indeed coming home to roost. A group of former senior commerce ministry officials recently issued a memorandum cautioning that if the US demands excessive concessions on India's core interests, 'India should take equally hard positions and resist – even at the cost of not securing a deal.' The memorandum, signed by former cabinet secretary K.M. Chandrasekhar, ex-commerce secretary Gopal Pillai and Ujal Singh Bhatia, who is the former WTO appellate body chair, among others, argued that the short-term costs of navigating a high-tariff US market may be less damaging than the long-term fallout of an unequal agreement. The statement emphasised that these negotiations are occurring in the shadow of an aggressive and unpredictable US trade policy. Trump's second term has been marked by indiscriminate use of tariffs and a deliberate redrawing of the global trade architecture. In recent bilateral discussions held in New Delhi, negotiators claimed progress on market access for industrial goods and some agricultural products, according to a June 10 Reuters report. But reports soon emerged suggesting talks were faltering, owing to several red lines from both sides. Complicating matters are Trump's seemingly dubious geopolitical claims – such as linking an India-Pakistan ceasefire to trade negotiations – statements that were denied by Indian officials but never directly countered by Modi or his cabinet. India has yet to publicly disclose the full extent of US demands, raising fears of quiet concessions under diplomatic or corporate pressure, including rumoured influence from large business conglomerates. Learning from China India could have taken a cue from China's tough approach. When Trump announced reciprocal tariffs in April 2018, Beijing responded measure-for-measure, refusing to be bullied. This strategy eventually led the US to seek a tariff truce. Admittedly, China has economic leverage – particularly in critical raw materials – that India currently lacks. However, India still had the option to adopt a firm, no-nonsense posture instead of rushing to accommodate US demands. Even a beleaguered nation like Iran has demonstrated its ability to stand its ground against dominant nuclear powers, maintaining control over more than 400kg of enriched uranium at 60% despite intense pressure. Today, India finds itself cornered. If it exits talks, it risks punitive tariffs like those faced by Canada and the EU. But capitulating could mean signing away sovereign policy space and inviting irreversible damage to its economy and agriculture – echoing the colonial entrapment of the East India Company era.
