Parents experience greater meaning in life, study confirms
I once heard someone say, "Having a child is like outsourcing a vital organ that runs around outside all by itself and climbs trees." Having a child is as fascinating and meaningful as it can also be worrying and exhausting.
A new study on
parental satisfaction
confirms this apparent contradiction. Compared to people who are
childfree
, parents feel their lives are more fulfilled. However, parents are not more satisfied with their lives than non-parents. On the contrary: they are often more dissatisfied.
These are the findings of the sociologists
Marita Jacob
and
Ansgar Hudde
from the
University of Cologne
, published this month in the specialist Journal of Marriage and Family. The researchers based their study on data from the European Social Survey, which had more than 43,000 respondents from 30 countries.
Jacob and Hudde determined that, regardless of nationality or social status, both mothers and fathers felt that their lives had a deeper meaning.
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Start Here - 2025 Top Trend Local network access control
Esseps
Learn More
Undo
But the same was not true of their satisfaction with their lives. This depended to a large extent not only on the respondent's living situation, but also on
family policy
in their country. And the difference was gendered: Mothers'
life satisfaction
levels were lower than those of fathers.
Scandinavia: Hardly any difference between parents and childfree:
"Parents in challenging life situations are less satisfied," says Marita Jacob, a sociology professor at the University of Cologne. Challenging might mean, for example, that they are a single parent, young, with low educational qualifications. Hardly surprising, you might think, that they are less satisfied.
But Jacob says it is not inevitable. "In
Scandinavian countries
, the differences between social groups are far less pronounced," she says. In these countries, the difference in life satisfaction between parents and child-free people is also far less than, for example, in central and eastern Europe.
Childcare, financial support for parents, parental leave — these family policy measures work very well in the Scandinavian countries, says Jacob. "My speculation is that these measures impact on society as a whole, meaning that children are not seen solely as their parents' problem, but as a responsibility for the community as a whole."
This attitude is also reflected in Scandinavian business culture, Jacob says. She explains that it is more normal there for parents to start and leave work early, as well as for important meetings to be scheduled around the rhythm of family life.
Greater gender equality leads to greater satisfaction:
Family life is still primarily taken care of by women. In Germany, one in two women reduces her working hours in order to be able to look after her children. Just under 6 per cent of German men who work part-time do so for family reasons. The majority of parental leave in Germany is also taken by mothers.
Another factor that may help to explain why parents in Finland are more satisfied than parents in Germany is gender equality. Equal pay in the Scandinavian countries, and a smaller gender pay gap as a result, means women there are more satisfied, says Jacob. She adds that this also has positive effects on the partnership, and thus also on the family.
"A child is not a project you can manage all by yourself":
Marita Jacob says that when her children were small, she banded together with other parents. "We would each always pick up several children from the kindergarten."
Anyone who has small children knows that an extra half-hour, or half an hour less, can absolutely determine whether or not the day will end in a nervous breakdown. This is why Jacob recommends that parents should not only offer each other more support, but should also accept it when offered.
Children are important — not only to counterbalance our ageing society, which won't be able to look after all its senior citizens without a young generation. As Marita Jacob stresses: "Children also have intrinsic value. They bring liveliness, new ideas and innovations to society."
This is why the sociologist believes that the bulk of the responsibility for them lies with policymakers. "Children shouldn't be their parents' problem when childcare is unreliable or there are problems with the school," she says. "Children are the responsibility of society as a whole."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Not found suitable: Reality of Dalit, Adivasi and OBCs in Indian universities
Various bodies governing academic institutions have established systems to ensure transparency and accountability in recruitment, promotions, and related academic activities. The teaching experience, papers published in refereed journals, research projects, and other accomplishments are the blueprints on which academic careers are built. All these 'academic' activities are not value-neutral and must be read through a socio-political prism. Often, the media highlights caste-based discrimination during recruitments/promotions. Still, nothing changes. Last week, while responding to a question from Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Jha, the Centre informed the RS that 80 per cent of the posts sanctioned in central universities for professors under the OBC category and nearly 83 per cent in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category are currently vacant. However, there is no centralised data on 'not found suitable' (NFS). It was recently reported that the University of Delhi snubbed a scientist belonging to the SC community as NFS to be promoted as professor. Similar instances could also be found during direct recruitments for reserved positions. The Registrar of Rajasthan Central University, in a notification dated May 29, provided a list of selected candidates for teaching positions. More than 50 per cent of positions were declared 'NFS' — 11 among them belong to SC/ST/OBC and EWS (two positions) categories at various levels. The data provided fails to mention the number of women candidates from these communities who have been declared NFS. The data compiled on higher education reveals that increasing numbers of SC/ST and OBC candidates are accessing higher education institutions. So, it is not the lack of 'qualified' and eligible candidates that keeps these seats vacant. According to German philosopher Jürgen Habermas, universities carry the seeds of the reproduction of social life-worlds and hence, constant vigilance is required to unleash its transformative potential. Similarly, sociologist Pierre Bourdieu emphasised that education plays a key role in maintaining the status quo , thereby perpetuating existing social inequalities. This is apparent in the deeply hierarchical Indian society. In public institutions, due to constitutional provisions, reservation has become mandatory, but a line needs to be drawn when it comes to teaching appointments/promotions. Only through promotions will the candidates from the marginalised communities be able to become associate professors, professors, deans and heads of the departments. This is the only way to ensure their active participation in decision-making bodies. However, 'casteplaining' prevalent in academia doesn't let this happen. Recently, Bangalore University was in the news as Dalit faculty alleged that despite having served in administrative roles for several years, alongside their teaching responsibilities, they are being 'sidelined' in appointments to statutory positions and are being given only 'supervisory' roles without adequate authority or recognition. Academia involves not only the attainment of relevant knowledge but also the grasping of soft skills such as mannerisms, clothing, diction, etc. This cultural capital, or the lack of it, becomes difficult to navigate during the selection process. Women candidates lose out if their speech or body language is seen as aggressive. Such candidates seem to disturb the equanimity of the department. I was part of an interview panel to select assistant professors for a private university. A Dalit woman candidate had a good grasp of the subject matter but lacked a polished English accent. The head of the panel observed that she would not be able to 'manage' the class as her speaking skills were limited. The class had students from management and commerce backgrounds from affluent families. Hence, even after recruitment, many were asked to perform more administrative duties than classroom teaching. Another bone of contention during the selection process is the quality of publications, which are subjective in nature. The publishing field is an exclusive zone, and very few students have the wherewithal to publish in 'reputed'/'impact factor' journals. Support of the research supervisor/mentors/peer group is vital in getting published, as one needs the right academic network to get labelled a good scholar. For the past few years, UGC has published the Care List of journals, and only those publications have been given weightage. Many journals that dealt with caste, gender, marginality, exclusion, etc., were removed from the list. Often, dubious and predatory journals had a higher 'impact factor' than scholarly ones such as the Economic and Political Weekly. Many were forced to pay to get the required scores. Even after the applications are screened by a duly constituted committee, the interview panel can refuse to recognise the publications commenting on their quality, language and content. What has seldom been acknowledged in the recruitment process are the ideological affiliations of the institutions/candidates. This is also a major reason for candidates being declared NFS. In the majority of the selection committees, experts constitute a small pool, belonging to the dominant communities, while exercising their caste and gender privileges. In DU colleges, the same set of experts is called to conduct the interviews, which raises questions of impartiality and fairness of the selection process. In DU and JNU, many teachers who protested against the institution were denied promotions for many years, citing flimsy reasons. The situation in regional and state universities is even worse. Journalist and author Isabel Wilkerson succinctly observed that when an 'accident of birth' aligns with what is most valued in a given caste system — being able-bodied, male, white, or other such traits — it becomes their moral duty to develop empathy for those who must endure the indignities they have been spared. It calls for a radical kind of empathy. This implies that as a society, we need to relearn a new consciousness, to understand another's experience from their perspective, not as we imagine. Only through such engagements can we rebuild institutions based on equality and fraternity, and the objective of social justice be attained. The writer is professor in Political Science, Department of Political Science, University of Delhi. He is the author of Caste Discrimination and Exclusion in Indian Universities: A Critical Reflection (Routledge)
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
BKU Dakaunda opposes Punjab's NOC for GM maize trials, warns of agitation
The Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) Ekta Dakaunda strongly opposed the no-objection certificate (NOC) issued by the Punjab government to the Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), Ludhiana, for conducting field trials of genetically modified (GM) maize on Monday. This variety of maize is engineered to tolerate glyphosate, a toxic herbicide for which scientific evidence from across the world has shown adverse effects on human health, soil micro-organisms, and the environment. The Punjab government issued a NoC on May 29 for confined field trials of two kinds of GM maize at PAU by Bayer, formerly Monsanto, a German multinational biotechnology company. The union pointed out that the Punjab government had banned the use of glyphosate as early as 2018, thereby acknowledging its harmful impact. 'In a state like Punjab, already grappling with a health crisis, high cancer rates, and environmental degradation, allowing trials of such toxic crops is utterly irresponsible. If the current government has any new safety data regarding glyphosate, it must be made public immediately,' said Jagmohan Singh, state general secretary of the union. The union also raised concerns that out of 11 states approached, only Punjab has granted an NOC to Bayer. 'This raises the question: does the Punjab government possess any special safety data that other states do not? Moreover, PAU's past record on this issue is controversial. During herbicide-tolerant mustard trials, documented biosafety violations—including photographic evidence—had come to light, but no action was taken against the responsible officials. Under such circumstances, how can farmers place their trust?' asked Jagmohan Singh. 'Another serious concern is the absence of any legal protocol in India for assessing herbicide-tolerant crops. Even the Supreme Court's July 2024 ruling on GMOs is yet to be implemented. In this legal vacuum, such trials are not only unjustified but also anti-people and anti-nature. The union demanded clarity on who approved these trials—was it a political decision or merely a bureaucratic one?' asked Jagmohan Singh. BKU Ekta Dakaunda has made several demands from the Punjab government, including immediate withdrawal of the NOC granted for GM maize, public disclosure of all scientific and administrative documents related to the decision, formation of an independent inquiry committee to investigate the hidden reasons behind this decision, strong policy decisions to keep Punjab's agriculture free from GM crops and toxic chemicals and development and testing of new seeds transparently by PAU in consultation with farmers. 'Adding to the gravity of the issue is Punjab's 2018 executive order prohibiting the use of glyphosate across the state. The ban was based on recommendations from the Central Insecticide Board and Registration Committee, which allows glyphosate only in tea plantations and non-cropped areas—conditions not applicable to Punjab, where nearly 100 per cent of the agricultural land is under cultivation,' said Jagmohan Singh. 'The state's prohibition order also cited scientific findings that link glyphosate to cancer and DNA damage, drawing on expert opinions from institutions like the Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh,' said Jagmohan Singh, adding that if government possesses new safety data that overrides the scientific concerns and policy decisions made earlier, it must be made public immediately. Boota Singh Burjgill, state president, said BKU Dakaunda reiterated its firm opposition to GM crops and chemical-based farming and pledged to continue its struggle to protect Punjab's farmers, soil, and future generations.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Biggest ever' US-EU trade deal: 5 takeaways
After months of tense negotiations, including repeated threats by Donald Trump to increase tariffs on the European Union, the US on Sunday (July 27) announced it had reached a trade deal with the bloc. The deal announced by US President Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf club in Turnberry, Scotland, sets a baseline tariff rate of 15% on all European goods, effective Friday (August 1). To recap, Trump had previously announced a 10% baseline tariff on most imports from the EU, 25% tariffs on automobiles, and 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium. Since April, the US has charged an additional 10% 'reciprocal' tariff on top of the pre-existing 4.8% average duty on imports from the EU. Earlier this month, he threatened to impose 30% tariffs if a deal was concluded by August 1. 'It's the biggest of all the deals,' Trump said on Sunday. 'I think it's going to be great for both parties,' von der Leyen concurred, describing this as 'the best we could get' and saying, 'Today's deal creates certainty in uncertain times.' Here is all you need to know. All EU goods will face a baseline tariff of 15%, half the 30% rate Trump had threatened to implement come August 1. The deal includes medicines, semiconductor chips, and cars. US exporters would now have access to European markets, and may face zero tariffs for certain products. The zero tariffs would reportedly apply to sectors including 'all aircraft and component parts, certain chemicals, certain generics, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials', von der Leyen said. A Reuters report quoted a US official as saying that commercial aircraft would face zero tariffs for now, while there was a 'reasonably good chance' that a new rate less than 15% could be realised later. Uncertainty still remains over the tariffs European wine and spirits producers will face in the US, but she said the matter would be resolved in the coming days. 2 – Steel and aluminium tariffs remain at 50%, cars effectively at 27.5% The deal does not include European steel and aluminium, which continue to face a separate 50% import tax. However, von der Leyen said that further negotiations could yield a quota system, wherein such imports within a certain quota could escape the additional duty. Meanwhile, European cars face a 27.5% tariff, with Trump's 25% rate coming atop the pre-existing 2.5% tariffs in place. Germany will likely bear the brunt, given its export-driven economy and large automotive sector. Manufacturers VW, Mercedes and BMW were among the worst-affected by the tariffs, in place since April. While German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal, industrial groups in the country have been critical of it. The Federation of German Industries (BDI) called the deal 'an inadequate compromise' that 'sends a fatal signal to the closely intertwined economies on both sides of the Atlantic.' The US has been the second major market for the European auto industry. Data from Acea (the European Auto Manufacturers Association) showed that the EU exported 757,654 new vehicles to the US last year, worth €38.9 billion ($45.41 billion), and imported 169,152 new vehicles from the US, worth €7.8 billion ($9.1 billion). 3 – European investment commitments in the US The EU has agreed to purchase American energy products worth $750 billion, chiefly oil, gas, including liquified gas, nuclear fuel and semiconductors. It will also $600 billion in the US in addition to its current investments, including purchases of military equipment, Trump said. von der Leyen confirmed the EU would commit to buying $250 billion of US energy products annually for the next three years. 'With this deal, we are securing access to our largest export market,' she said. Trump also said that the EU would purchase a 'vast amount of military equipment' from the US. However, no definite purchase commitment has been made. Since the war between Russia and Ukraine commenced in 2022, the EU has increased its military spending, boosted by Trump's remarks earlier in the year pushing for increased European military spending. Thus far, they have focused on purchasing military equipment from European companies. 4 – Only temporary relief for semiconductors, pharmaceuticals The deal currently retains the 15% tariff rate for pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, which are subject to separate tariff investigations. The Guardian reported that sources said the EU investment commitments helped seal the 15% tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. However, both sectors face the threat of additional tariffs in the future. Trump has previously threatened 200% tariffs on pharma imports, while US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that semiconductor tariffs could also be announced in the coming weeks. Data from the European Commission's data wing, Eurostat, indicate that medicines were the EU's top exports to the US in 2024, amounting to nearly €80 billion. Ireland, which Trump has accused of having 'the entire US pharmaceutical industry in its grasp', has been the largest pharma exporter. 5 – An Ireland-shaped problem The tariff announcement presents a unique conundrum for the island of Ireland, wherein traders in Northern Ireland, a constituent of the UK, can sell goods to the US at 10% tariffs, while Ireland the country faces the 15% tariff rate. A similar situation was last faced during Brexit, when Northern Ireland (as part of the UK) exited the EU in 2020, while Ireland remained a member of the bloc. After tedious negotiations, the two arrived at the Windsor Framework in February 2023, which resolved the issues around customs arrangements. A similar understanding will now become necessary for the two regions to ensure stability across the island and diplomacy continues under the Good Friday agreement, which formally ended 30 years of conflict between Ireland and Northern Ireland. Ireland's deputy prime minister, Simon Harris, said he 'regretted' the 15% tariff rate but said 'certainty' was important. In 2024, the total goods trade between the US and the EU amounted to $975.9 billion, US Trade Representative data showed. The US ran a $235.6 billion trade deficit with the EU, a 12.9% increase over the previous year. European Commission data showed that the US was its largest trading partner in 2024, accounting for 20% of EU goods exports, with Germany, Ireland, France and Italy as the top exporters. The major exports from the EU were over €200 billion (over $227 billion) of machinery and vehicles, €160 billion (over $182 billion) of chemicals and €25 billion (over $28 billion) of food and drink.
