Upgraded nuclear power gallery opens at Delhi Science Centre
Spread across 7,000sqft, the permanent gallery now features more than 56 interactive exhibits aimed at making nuclear science accessible to the public—especially students. The ₹1.25 crore upgrade was funded by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL) as part of a long-running collaboration under a 2012 MoU with the National Council of Science Museums.
'The essence remains, but the exhibits have evolved with time,' said BVS. Sekhar, NPCIL executive director, who inaugurated the gallery. 'We've incorporated new technologies, made it more intuitive, and leveraged the museum's expertise in science communication.'
Visitors can now experience a 3D walk-through of a nuclear power plant, explore an omni-projection of solar fusion, and test a touch-screen simulator that mimics a nuclear control room—showing in real time how changes affect output and safety.
The Hall of Nuclear Power is now open to visitors daily from 9:30am to 6pm.
'We've reworked the entire user experience,' said Vijay Shankar, director of the Delhi Science Centre. 'The safety section now reflects updated commissioning protocols, and every system is built to invite curiosity.'
The gallery also tells the story of India's nuclear programme—its milestones, challenges, and promise—highlighting figures like Homi J Bhabha and India's use of thorium reserves as a sustainable energy path. Similar NPCIL-backed installations exist in Mumbai and Chennai, with smaller district level versions in the pipeline.
Shankar also announced a ₹32 crore grant from the ministry of tourism for wider upgrades to the science centre. 'We're working on new galleries on space exploration and prehistoric life. Public areas will also be redesigned in the next year.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
DRDO, AIIMS-Rishikesh ink MoU for clinical trials in field of biomedical devices
An institute of the DRDO has signed an agreement with AIIMS, Rishikesh for conducting " clinical trials " and advanced research in the field of biomedical devices related to human performance in extreme environments. The collaboration between the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) will facilitate the development of products, technologies and strategies for the "mitigation of effects" of extreme environments on human performance, officials said. Defence Institute of Physiology and Allied Sciences (DIPAS) of the DRDO has signed an MoU with AIIMS, Rishikesh for "conducting clinical trials and advanced research in the field of biomedical devices and supplements related to human performance in extreme environments," a senior official said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo This collaborative effort will facilitate the formulation and development of products, technologies and strategies for mitigation of effects of extreme environment on human performance, they said. The DRDO also shared some photos of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signing in a post on X late Friday.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 days ago
- Business Standard
Should you trust chatbots with health advice? Google study raises concerns
Ever found yourself typing health-related questions into an AI chatbot instead of consulting a doctor? A new Google-backed study has found that people frequently turn to AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Gemini for health-related advice—but many ask questions in ways that can accidentally trick the chatbot into giving biased or incomplete answers. The study, titled What's Up, Doc? Analysing How Users Seek Health Information in Large-Scale Conversational AI Datasets, published on arXiv, raises important concerns about the reliability and safety of using chatbots for health guidance. Conducted by researchers from Google, along with UNC Chapel Hill, Duke University, and the University of Washington, the study analysed over 11,000 real-world health conversations with chatbots to understand what people are really asking, and how those questions may sometimes lead them astray. According to the study, most people ask about treatments rather than symptoms or general information. The research also found that users often pose incomplete or leading questions, which result in inaccurate or biased chatbot responses. Why are people turning to AI chatbots for health advice? The study found that rising healthcare costs and limited access to doctors are pushing more people to seek quick, easy health answers from AI chatbots. It highlighted that around 31 per cent of US adults in 2024 had used generative AI for health-related questions. What kind of questions? Mostly about treatments, symptoms, lifestyle changes, and diagnostic tests. Chatbots are becoming the go-to digital 'doctor's assistant' for many. It is about how we ask health questions The researchers built a special dataset called HealthChat-11K with 25,000 user messages across 21 health specialities. They found that: Most conversations are short and focused on quick information Many users provide incomplete context, often leaving out critical details Around 23 per cent of treatment-related queries included leading phrases such as 'Is this the best drug for me?' or 'This should work, right?' These kinds of questions can trigger what researchers call the chatbot's 'sycophancy bias,' meaning the AI might simply agree with the user to sound helpful—even if the advice is incorrect. In some cases, users asked about unsafe or inappropriate treatments, which the chatbot still partially validated. Can chatbots handle complex health questions? The study found that AI chatbots may struggle with vague or partial information. They often assume users know how to describe their conditions properly, which is not always the case. For instance, a person might ask about a medicine without mentioning key medical history, leading to potentially incorrect chatbot responses. Can AI handle emotional conversations? The study also found that people sometimes express frustration, confusion, or gratitude during health-related chats. While emotional exchanges were less common, they often marked key turning points—either ending the conversation or spiralling into repetitive loops where the user kept challenging the chatbot. This highlights a need for AI models to better interpret emotional cues, not just facts. What can improve health chats with AI? The researchers suggested the following improvements: Train chatbots to ask clarifying follow-up questions when context is missing Design systems that recognise and handle leading or biased user questions Build models that respond to emotional cues more sensitively The study reinforces that in health chats with AI, how you ask matters just as much as what you ask. The way a question is framed can significantly influence the quality of the response. So next time you turn to AI for health advice, choose your words carefully—it could make all the difference. For more health updates, follow #HealthWithBS
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 days ago
- First Post
Are you really cool? A global survey finds 6 traits to fit the definition
The study, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, involved nearly 6,000 participants from 12 countries. Despite differences in geography, age, income, education, and gender, responses were remarkably consistent read more A new global survey has identified six core traits commonly associated with 'cool' individuals: extroversion, hedonism, power, adventurousness, openness, and autonomy. The study, published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, involved nearly 6,000 participants from 12 countries. Despite differences in geography, age, income, education, and gender, responses were remarkably consistent. 'What blew my mind was the fact that it was pretty much the same result everywhere,' said Dr Caleb Warren, one of the study's authors and a professor at the Eller College of Management at the University of Arizona. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Cool, but not always kind Participants were asked to think of specific people they considered cool, not cool, good, and not good. They then assessed these individuals based on 15 personality traits. While there was some overlap between cool and good individuals, 'good' people were more often described as conforming, traditional, secure, warm, agreeable, conscientious, calm, and universalistic. Interestingly, kindness, commonly associated with goodness, was not a defining feature of those seen as cool. Western roots of cool All participants recognized the word 'cool' in English, without translation. Researchers suggest this reflects the global influence of American media and cultural exports. 'Globally, American success has led to the diffusion of music styles and an immense amount of cultural content, including, apparently, the concept of cool,' said Dr Joseph Henrich, an anthropologist at Harvard University who was not involved in the study. Limits and bias One limitation noted by the researchers is that participants who didn't recognize the English word 'cool' were excluded. This means the findings cannot fully assess how the concept is understood or valued in non-Western cultures. The average age of participants also skewed young, typically around 30 or under. Other studies suggest cultural factors influence what is seen as desirable. 'Factors like aggression make us have higher status in some Western cultures and simultaneously give us less status in the East,' said Mitch Prinstein, chief of psychology at the American Psychological Association. Adolescence and identity Coolness may be especially influential during adolescence. Prior research has found it affects preferences in entertainment, social interactions, and even consumer behaviour. But what society deems cool may not always align with personal values. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Dr Warren and his colleagues made this distinction by comparing perceptions of cool versus good. Across cultures, traits tied to kindness or helpfulness were more frequently associated with being good rather than cool. Is it worth it? Dr Warren offers a word of caution. 'I have serious doubts,' he said, when asked if coolness is a trait worth chasing. Some research suggests that adolescents who engage in risk-taking to appear cool may face challenges later in life, including issues with substance use and relationships. 'They are doing more extreme things to try to act cool,' one of the researchers told The New York Times. Dr Prinstein added that while popularity may bring attention and visibility, long-term success often depends on being genuinely liked. 'Even the most uncool kid will probably fare well if they have at least one close friend,' he said. Coolness, it seems, is more complicated than it appears, and not always beneficial in the long run. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
