What to expect as Huawei and Samsung set to launch new smartphones
Consumers will be watching with bated breath as Samsung and Huawei prepare to launch their new smartphones.
On Thursday, tech journalists in South Africa will get a glimpse into Samsung's new smartphone, reportedly the Galaxy Z Fold 7, with the company sharing a teaser for the event, 'Be the first to experience the Ultra Unfold.'
Huawei unveiled its Pura 80 series for journalists in Shenzhen, China, last week, with the official launch of the devices expected to take place on July 10th in Dubai. The company shared this teaser: 'Where light meets shadow, a new story begins.'
Battlegrounds
The battle for a major share of the smartphone market, particularly in South Africa, is simmering as consumers demand devices with the latest innovation but at an affordable price.
Sadly, the new flagship smartphones are too often breaking bank balances rather than boundaries.
Earlier this year, Huawei unveiled the Mate XT Ultimate Design, which costs a whopping R70,000, while last year's Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 retails for about R45,000.
The all-new #HUAWEIPura80 Ultra stuns with a glazed gold finish, adopting a dazzling forward symbol design, and a radiant Sunburst Pattern that catches every eye. #HuaweiLaunch pic.twitter.com/ttcqOcx9Lc — Huawei Mobile SA (@HuaweiZA) June 27, 2025
ALSO READ: [REVIEW] Huawei Mate XT: No tri-fold gimmick smartphone, but it's pricey
Money to burn
While this is wad of cash to part with for phone which could possibly be the price of a second hand car, mobile operators are heavily subsidizing these smartphones luring consumer into 36-month contracts which is not lucrative as smartphones brands unveil new devices every year leaving customers stuck with devices for three years if they cannot sell old phones to upgrade.
As for what Huawei and Samsung have up their sleeves, previous launches have focused strongly on artificial intelligence (AI) technology, with very few cosmetic changes.
💙 Like this post and be the first to witness what's next on GalaxyUnpacked. Something new is unfolding and yes, it's worth the wait 😉 This is the upgrade you've been waiting for. GalaxyAI pic.twitter.com/0Bg6up5A0X — Samsung Mobile SA (@SamsungMobileSA) July 1, 2025
Innovation
As companies innovate for thinner, foldable smartphones with impressive cameras and advanced AI technology, it's hard to imagine what's coming next.
While smartphone prices have soared for flagship devices, many brands are also trying to capture a bigger slice of the mid-range market with affordable devices that offer top-end features, typically found in more expensive phones, at a fraction of the price.
As for what Samsung and Huawei have up their sleeves, stay tuned to The Citizen for all the details.
ALSO READ: WATCH: Samsung S25 Ultra an AI marvel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
IRR warns Parliament against expropriating SARB
The Institute of Race Relations has made written and oral submissions to Parliament in opposition to the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) Amendment Bill. The Bill, tabled by Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema in 2018, is moving forward to a committee vote on 'desirability'. The IRR warned that it is undesirable, uneconomical, unfunded, unconsidered, and unconstitutional. To start, the Bill expropriates the shareholders of the SARB without compensation, which is a direct violation of constitutionally protected property rights. The shares are worth an estimated R20 million, so no one can seriously claim that the Bill would expropriate these shares without compensation to save the fisc money. Rather, the real purpose of such an exercise is to try to set a precedent that any shares in the country can be expropriated without compensation, including trillions of rands worth of stock and bond securities that depend on SARB's prudent monetary management. So extreme is the Bill's threat of expropriation without compensation that even the government and members of the ANC have voiced public opposition to it. Treasury official Christopher Axelson, representing the government, spoke out at length in opposition to this danger and other dangerous aspects of the Bill before Parliament. Says IRR Fellow Gabriel Crouse: 'The effort to expropriate rural landowners in the hinterland is death to property rights by a thousand cuts. Expropriating SARB shareholders without compensation poses the same threat, only faster, like an atom bomb.' SARB's 802 shareholders make very little money from those shares, with dividends limited to R1,000 per annum, but do get to elect seven of the SARB's 15 directors. This decentralised, minority input provides a public-private engagement mechanism that has helped implement the 'primary object' of the SARB, which is 'to protect the value of the currency', according to the Constitution. SARB is arguably the most successful government institution at hitting its target. Over the last quarter of a century, it has largely succeeded in maintaining inflation within the 3% - 6% target range that was nominated for it by the then-minister of finance back in 2000. Most of South Africa's thousands of other organs of state have, by stark contrast, been riddled with ongoing state capture, often taking them well beyond the point of bankruptcy. Most organisations where the state is the 'sole shareholder' are so badly off that President Cyril Ramaphosa's first, second, and third presidential terms have included repeated calls for 'reform' through 'public-private partnerships' that increase the role of the private sector. So why, in this local environment, would anyone want to make the same overburdened state the 'sole shareholder' of one of the only bastions of excellence, namely SARB? Malema, the Bill's sponsor, leaves no room for mystery about it. Malema openly calls for total nationalisation of the land, banks, and mines, which would be significantly easier if the SARB were captured, and forced to abandon its mandate temporarily by stocking rampant inflation. That sudden loosening of monetary policy would produce what luminary SARB Governor Lesetja Kganyago has warned would be a 'deep depression'. It would also create enough chaos to facilitate a deeper round of state capture. Crouse concludes: 'This is a test for the GNU. The MK, EFF, and Action SA signalled support for the Bill in Parliament. If the ANC joins those parties in keeping the Bill alive to spite its investment-friendly GNU partners, this will damage government unity. More importantly, it dangles a threat over everyone's prospects, and the lifesavings of those who have any.' Institute of Race Relations I Joburg
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
IRR warns Parliament against expropriating SARB
So extreme is the Bill's threat of expropriation without compensation that even the government and members of the ANC have voiced public opposition to it. The Institute of Race Relations has made written and oral submissions to Parliament in opposition to the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) Amendment Bill. The Bill, tabled by Economic Freedom Fighters leader Julius Malema in 2018, is moving forward to a committee vote on 'desirability'. The IRR warned that it is undesirable, uneconomical, unfunded, unconsidered, and unconstitutional. To start, the Bill expropriates the shareholders of the SARB without compensation, which is a direct violation of constitutionally protected property rights. The shares are worth an estimated R20 million, so no one can seriously claim that the Bill would expropriate these shares without compensation to save the fisc money. Rather, the real purpose of such an exercise is to try to set a precedent that any shares in the country can be expropriated without compensation, including trillions of rands worth of stock and bond securities that depend on SARB's prudent monetary management. So extreme is the Bill's threat of expropriation without compensation that even the government and members of the ANC have voiced public opposition to it. Treasury official Christopher Axelson, representing the government, spoke out at length in opposition to this danger and other dangerous aspects of the Bill before Parliament. Says IRR Fellow Gabriel Crouse: 'The effort to expropriate rural landowners in the hinterland is death to property rights by a thousand cuts. Expropriating SARB shareholders without compensation poses the same threat, only faster, like an atom bomb.' SARB's 802 shareholders make very little money from those shares, with dividends limited to R1,000 per annum, but do get to elect seven of the SARB's 15 directors. This decentralised, minority input provides a public-private engagement mechanism that has helped implement the 'primary object' of the SARB, which is 'to protect the value of the currency', according to the Constitution. SARB is arguably the most successful government institution at hitting its target. Over the last quarter of a century, it has largely succeeded in maintaining inflation within the 3% - 6% target range that was nominated for it by the then-minister of finance back in 2000. Most of South Africa's thousands of other organs of state have, by stark contrast, been riddled with ongoing state capture, often taking them well beyond the point of bankruptcy. Most organisations where the state is the 'sole shareholder' are so badly off that President Cyril Ramaphosa's first, second, and third presidential terms have included repeated calls for 'reform' through 'public-private partnerships' that increase the role of the private sector. So why, in this local environment, would anyone want to make the same overburdened state the 'sole shareholder' of one of the only bastions of excellence, namely SARB? Malema, the Bill's sponsor, leaves no room for mystery about it. Malema openly calls for total nationalisation of the land, banks, and mines, which would be significantly easier if the SARB were captured, and forced to abandon its mandate temporarily by stocking rampant inflation. That sudden loosening of monetary policy would produce what luminary SARB Governor Lesetja Kganyago has warned would be a 'deep depression'. It would also create enough chaos to facilitate a deeper round of state capture. Crouse concludes: 'This is a test for the GNU. The MK, EFF, and Action SA signalled support for the Bill in Parliament. If the ANC joins those parties in keeping the Bill alive to spite its investment-friendly GNU partners, this will damage government unity. More importantly, it dangles a threat over everyone's prospects, and the lifesavings of those who have any.' Institute of Race Relations I Joburg
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
What to expect as Huawei and Samsung set to launch new smartphones
Consumers will be watching with bated breath to see what will be launched. Consumers will be watching with bated breath as Samsung and Huawei prepare to launch their new smartphones. On Thursday, tech journalists in South Africa will get a glimpse into Samsung's new smartphone, reportedly the Galaxy Z Fold 7, with the company sharing a teaser for the event, 'Be the first to experience the Ultra Unfold.' Huawei unveiled its Pura 80 series for journalists in Shenzhen, China, last week, with the official launch of the devices expected to take place on July 10th in Dubai. The company shared this teaser: 'Where light meets shadow, a new story begins.' Battlegrounds The battle for a major share of the smartphone market, particularly in South Africa, is simmering as consumers demand devices with the latest innovation but at an affordable price. Sadly, the new flagship smartphones are too often breaking bank balances rather than boundaries. Earlier this year, Huawei unveiled the Mate XT Ultimate Design, which costs a whopping R70,000, while last year's Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 retails for about R45,000. The all-new #HUAWEIPura80 Ultra stuns with a glazed gold finish, adopting a dazzling forward symbol design, and a radiant Sunburst Pattern that catches every eye. #HuaweiLaunch — Huawei Mobile SA (@HuaweiZA) June 27, 2025 ALSO READ: [REVIEW] Huawei Mate XT: No tri-fold gimmick smartphone, but it's pricey Money to burn While this is wad of cash to part with for phone which could possibly be the price of a second hand car, mobile operators are heavily subsidizing these smartphones luring consumer into 36-month contracts which is not lucrative as smartphones brands unveil new devices every year leaving customers stuck with devices for three years if they cannot sell old phones to upgrade. As for what Huawei and Samsung have up their sleeves, previous launches have focused strongly on artificial intelligence (AI) technology, with very few cosmetic changes. 💙 Like this post and be the first to witness what's next on GalaxyUnpacked. Something new is unfolding and yes, it's worth the wait 😉 This is the upgrade you've been waiting for. GalaxyAI — Samsung Mobile SA (@SamsungMobileSA) July 1, 2025 Innovation As companies innovate for thinner, foldable smartphones with impressive cameras and advanced AI technology, it's hard to imagine what's coming next. While smartphone prices have soared for flagship devices, many brands are also trying to capture a bigger slice of the mid-range market with affordable devices that offer top-end features, typically found in more expensive phones, at a fraction of the price. As for what Samsung and Huawei have up their sleeves, stay tuned to The Citizen for all the details. ALSO READ: WATCH: Samsung S25 Ultra an AI marvel
