
One month on, killings persist in Syria's Alawi heartlands
What began as an attack on government security forces by Assad loyalists - many from the former president's Alawite sect - on 6 March had quickly spiralled into revenge attacks on civilians.
The Syrian Network for Human Rights said 1,334 civilians, mostly Alawis, lost their lives in the violence in March, including 889 killed by armed forces involved in the security crackdowns in the region. At least 446 people were killed by non-state armed groups linked to Assad, the report added.
Days later, authorities said they had regained control of the situation and have vowed accountability and safety measures, but residents say the calm never came.
Speaking to Middle East Eye, 20 eyewitnesses and relatives of victims confirmed that military raids are also still ongoing, often under the pretext of searching for looters or Assad loyalists. All witness accounts were given to MEE on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Residents and local observers said the violence appears to be both random and systematic, carried out by armed factions with minimal interference from state authorities.
In Sqoubin, a village in Latakia's countryside, the son of a prominent Alawi cleric was gunned down while returning from work on 5 April. He was riding a motorcycle with two relatives when their path was reportedly blocked by armed men.
Middle East Eye has approached the Latakia governor's office for comment.
The following day, in al-Mawrid village near Baniyas, assailants launched an attack from a neighbouring village. A young man was shot, and a disabled child was beaten. Both remain in critical condition. Despite pleas for help, residents said General Security forces failed to intervene.
On 3 April, three young men from Tartous went missing while travelling out of town. That same week, two other young men were abducted in the Safita countryside and later found dead near a farm in Tallet al-Khodr.
Witnesses said the pair had been forced into a black Honda Accord by armed men in civilian clothing who claimed to be from General Security.
'It depends on their mood'
Residents describe a pattern of state-linked violence and non-state militia raids merging into one another. In al-Mahfoura, Homs, unidentified gunmen on motorcycles entered the village, fired several shots into the air, and then assassinated a local water well guard with six bullets.
The attackers exited through roads flanked by government checkpoints, raising questions about how they moved undetected.
A weekend from hell in coastal Syria Read More »
Meanwhile, in Wadi al-Dahab, Homs, a 19-year-old barber trainee was gunned down outside his barbershop on 7 April. The attackers escaped before General Security arrived, though the incident prompted a significant security presence.
A day later, three men, including two brothers, were shot by security forces around 3pm in the al-Azhari square in Latakia, according to witnesses. The men were on foot when General Security officers asked if they were Alawis before shooting them in the head.
The incident triggered panic, with a bus driver abandoning his vehicle and passengers fleeing on foot.
Lines between state-backed forces, rebel factions, and opportunistic militias have increasingly blurred, fuelling a pervasive sense of lawlessness.
'Each time a new group comes,' said one man from Jableh. 'Some shout religious slogans, some don't speak. You never know what you're dealing with.'
Religious profiling has also become routine at checkpoints dotting the coastal mountain roads.
Travellers are reportedly interrogated about their sect, and those who identify as Alawi often face beatings, insults, or detention. 'It depends on the mood of the guy at the checkpoint,' a local resident said.
'Everything is good, don't worry'
In the village of al-Sanobar, located between Latakia city and Jableh, six masked gunmen stormed two neighbouring homes on 6 April, leaving one woman hospitalised and several families displaced.
The assailants, dressed in matching uniforms, entered the area in the afternoon and initially reassured locals.
'They said everything is good, don't worry,' one resident told MEE about the fighters who had raided their house. 'But then they started asking for gold, money, phones.'
'Each time a new group comes. Some shout religious slogans, some don't speak. You never know what you're dealing with'
- Resident, Jableh
One of the targeted houses belonged to a school principal in her mid-40s. Witnesses said she was struck in the head and had her golden earrings torn off. 'She was still bleeding before fleeing to another village,' an eyewitness said.
In the neighbouring home, a physics teacher managed to flee through the back gate into the garden. His wife and adult children stayed behind as the attackers looted everything they could find, including old Syrian lira coins, mobile phones, and laptops.
Residents say these were not isolated incidents. Many have already fled the village, and those who remain live in fear.
'Only five houses are still occupied,' said another local. 'People have left after seeing what happened.'
Even civilians trying to restore a sense of normalcy have come under attack.
On the morning of 7 April, a group of teachers attempting to reopen the local school in al-Sanobar were met with gunfire. 'Four unidentified people on two motorbikes fired into the air,' said a witness. 'They saw the teachers returning and wanted to scare them away.'
The incident was not investigated by the General Security, which arrived later that evening to arrest 25 people while searching for a family allegedly involved in a December attack on its troops. All the men were released after one night.
The school remains closed, as do the citrus groves that once sustained the village.
The psychological toll on children has also been severe.
'My children don't talk about it,' one parent said. 'But they wake up crying. One of them screams in her sleep.'
'We're on our own'
The recent raids near al-Sanobar followed a now familiar pattern seen across Latakia, Tartous, Baniyas, and parts of Homs, where armed men arrive in vehicles nearly identical to official military convoys and pass through checkpoints without resistance.
Although the mass killings of early March have tapered off, smaller-scale attacks are becoming more frequent.
In recent days, multiple Alawi civilians have been found dead across the coastal region, many bearing signs of execution-style killings. On Monday, the Observatory said 12 civilians, mostly Alawis, were killed in incidents of apparent sectarian violence.
'The killings haven't stopped. They've simply become more calculated'
- Resident, al-Sanobar
'The killings haven't stopped' one resident in al-Sanobar said. 'They've simply become more calculated.'
In one of the latest incidents, the body of a young man kidnapped days earlier in Homs was found dumped near the rocky corniche in Tartous, shot in the head, locals said.
On the same day, two other men were discovered dead in separate locations in Tartous and Latakia, residents said, heightening fears that targeted abductions and executions are becoming routine in Syria's coastal provinces.
Attempts by Alawi community leaders to form a local council have repeatedly faltered amid fear and fragmentation.
The response by the state has been largely absent. Calls to local police stations have gone unanswered or redirected. 'They told us, 'It's another group. We can't help,'' said one woman in Latakia, reflecting a broader sense of abandonment amongst residents.
While many Alawis remained loyal to President Bashar al-Assad throughout the civil war, frustration had grown in recent years within Alawi-dominated areas.
'He was still a child': Grief and fear at Latakia hospital Read More »
By 2023, public criticism of the Assad government intensified, with many citing corruption, economic collapse, and a lack of civil liberties.
Despite the recent violence, the government has moved ahead with formal reconciliation efforts.
On 8 April, authorities announced that the demobilisation centre in Latakia had resumed operations after a temporary pause due to attacks in the region.
Officials reported that approximately 27,000 former government soldiers had completed settlement procedures.
Yet as violence persists in provinces once considered stable, the prospect of meaningful stabilisation seems increasingly distant. With each passing week, trust in both state and non-state actors continues to erode.
'No one is protecting us,' said a resident displaced from Al-Sanobar. 'We're on our own.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Syria after Assad: How Israel and the US are accelerating plans to partition the country
Last month, Israel launched a new round of air strikes on Syria, hitting targets near Damascus, Homs and the southern province of Sweida. Presented as attacks on Syrian government forces and under the pretext of protecting the Druze minority, they aim to advance the Zionist regime's ongoing campaign of regional domination and fragmentation. Since the fall of Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, Israel has expanded its aggression, occupying more than 400 sqkm of additional Syrian territory and systematically destroying what remains of the country's military infrastructure. This escalation comes as Israel's genocidal war on Gaza, now in its 23rd month, continues to reverberate across multiple fronts. The United States has also carried out air strikes and raids, backed Kurdish forces in the northeast and facilitated Israeli attacks - all to maintain its foothold in Syria and prevent the rise of any force that could challenge its order. While the US prioritises geostrategic control and the protection of its energy and security interests, Israel seeks to break Syria into ethnic and sectarian enclaves as part of a decades-old strategy to fragment the Arab world and cement its own regional hegemony. This policy follows the approach both have pursued since the outset of the Syrian war in 2011. At its core lies a shared objective: to dismantle Syria as a unified, sovereign state and ensure that no regional or global actor can challenge the American-Israeli order in the Middle East. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Fragmenting Syria Israel's strategy in the Arab world can be traced back to the early days of the Zionist state. Internal Israeli strategic documents from the 1950s, including proposals by the Israeli foreign ministry and Mossad, advocated for a Kurdish state as a buffer against Arab nationalism. This vision was later crystallised in the infamous 1982 Yinon Plan, authored by Oded Yinon, a former Israeli foreign ministry official. The plan called for "the dissolution of districts of ethnic and religious minorities...[as] Israel's primary target on the Eastern front in the long will disintegrate into several states along the lines of its ethnic and religious structure". Israel's dominance depended on fragmenting the Arab world into sectarian and ethnic enclaves, replacing strong, unified countries with weak, balkanised statelets The Yinon Plan argued that Israel's security and dominance depended on the dissolution of Arab states into smaller sectarian and ethnic entities, including Druze, Alawi, Kurdish, Maronite, Coptic and others. The aim was to replace strong, centralised Arab states with weak, balkanised statelets that posed no threat to Israel and could potentially become allies or proxies under Israeli protection. In the case of Syria, this strategy involves the partition of the country into four main zones of influence: 1) a Druze homeland centred in Sweida in southern Syria, where Israel hopes to foster a Druze-aligned mini-state under its influence; 2) an Alawi statelet in the coastal region under Russian protection, centred around Latakia and Tartus; 3) a Kurdish zone in northeastern Syria, backed by the US, where the Democratic Union Party (PYD) and People's Protection Units (YPG) control vast swathes of territory; and 4) a Sunni Arab belt under Turkish influence, especially along the northern and northwestern borders and the heartland. This partition model directly serves Israeli goals by keeping Syria weak, divided and unable to re-emerge as a regional actor capable of supporting the Palestinian resistance or opposing Israeli expansionism. It has long been embedded in Zionist strategy for the Middle East. One of the most influential Zionist thinkers and advisers to American and Israeli officials, Bernard Lewis, wrote in 1992: "Most of the states of the Middle to such a process [of 'Lebanonisation']. If the central power is sufficiently state then a chaos of squabbling, feuding, fighting sects, tribes, regions, and parties." Crippling Syria Since 2013, the Zionist regime has waged a sustained aerial campaign on Syrian territory, often under the pretext of targeting Iranian or Hezbollah positions. After 7 October 2023, these attacks expanded to include the assassination of senior Iranian and Hezbollah commanders on Syrian soil, as part of a wider assault on the so-called "Axis of Resistance" - targeting Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah and allied forces across the region, including in Syria. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of Israel's war on Gaza Israel's destabilisation efforts in Syria mirror the siege and destruction it is inflicting on Gaza, and are aimed at weakening resistance forces and accelerating the long-standing plan to divide the country. Over time, Israel has destroyed Syria's air defence systems, weapons depots, military bases and scientific research centres. In recent months, this strategy has sought to deter Iran, prevent Syria from rebuilding its military capacity and enforce permanent Israeli military and psychological superiority in the region. Controlling Syria The US strategy in Syria aligns with its post-Cold War grand strategy of preventing any regional or global rival from gaining ground. During the Cold War, Washington viewed Syria, especially under former President Hafez al-Assad, as a Soviet client state and a supporter of Arab nationalist causes, Palestinian resistance and regional alliances opposed to US influence. After the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the US sought to isolate Syria and prevent it from filling the regional vacuum left by Saddam Hussein's ouster. Since Syria's 2011 uprising, the US has adopted a policy of selective engagement: backing Kurdish forces in the northeast under the guise of countering extremist groups and limiting Iranian influence, while allowing Israeli strikes. Syria after Assad: Why Israel's vow to 'protect' the Druze is hollow Read More » Even though the US appears to support a de facto partition of Syria, its objective is not necessarily Israeli-style ethnic fragmentation. Rather, it seeks to preserve a military and political presence that blocks Russian and Iranian access to the eastern Mediterranean and ensures any future Syrian government aligns with Washington's strategic interests. The recent escalation in the southern Druze-majority city of Sweida underscores Israel's interest in carving out a loyal enclave along its northern front - a goal consistent with the Yinon Plan's strategy of cultivating alliances with minorities who might favour autonomy under Israeli patronage. Yet the Druze community remains divided, with many rejecting foreign interference. While Israel pushes for this statelet, the US is cautious - calling for calm but avoiding any condemnation, wary of backlash in neighbouring states and among Druze communities inside Israel. It also fears that further fragmentation could strengthen extremist groups or open the door to Russian and Iranian gains. The US, therefore, prefers a controlled, divided Syria - weak enough to be pliant but not totally collapsed - where it can retain influence without triggering wider regional instability. Israel, by contrast, is more willing to tolerate, or even foment, chaos if it means permanently removing Syria as a potential threat, especially having already annexed the Syrian Golan Heights. Turkey's stake Turkey plays a crucial role in Syria's current reconstruction. Ankara initially sought regime change in Damascus by backing opposition groups and militant factions. However, after failed attempts to unseat Assad and growing concerns over Kurdish autonomy near its borders, Turkey shifted focus. Turkish forces moved into parts of northern Syria, where they support Syrian Arab and Turkmen militias in order to check and limit Kurdish influence. Since the ouster of Assad, Turkey has become the main power backing and supporting the current Syrian regime. Turkey's interests diverge sharply from those of the US and Israel, which have focused on empowering Kurdish militias and Druze separatists, respectively. While the US and Israel have supported Kurdish actors as counterweights to Assad and Iran, Turkey considers any Kurdish autonomy a national security threat. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan recently declared: "Turkey will intervene against any attempts to fragment Syria or allow militant groups to gain are warning you: no group should engage in acts towards division." Fight for the 'Heartland' A famous principle of geopolitical theory, put forward by British academic and politician Halford Mackinder, states: "Who rules Eastern Europe commands the Heartland; who rules the Heartland commands the World Island; who rules the World Island commands the world." Unless regional actors form a coordinated response, Syria's dismemberment could become a permanent reality By analogy, Syria occupies a central node in the Arab world, controlling vital transit routes, trade corridors and regional alliances - much like Mackinder's Heartland. Regional and global powers believe that whoever controls Syria, or a major part of it, will influence - if not shape - the entire Middle East. In this context, the US and Israel are executing a two-pronged policy in Syria. For the US, Syria is a chessboard on which it seeks to block adversaries, protect petrodollar hegemony and secure Israel's position without becoming too entangled. For Israel, Syria is an existential threat to be dismantled and restructured into a patchwork of mini-states. The danger lies in the prolonged suffering of the Syrian people, the erosion of Arab sovereignty and the potential explosion of wider conflict. Unless regional actors - particularly Turkey, but also Iran and Arab states - form a coordinated response, Syria's dismemberment could become a permanent reality, fulfilling the long-standing Zionist blueprint for a fractured, compliant Middle East. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
US House Speaker 'calls West Bank rightful property of Jewish people' during visit
, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, visited the Israeli settlement of Ariel in the West Bank on Monday, according to reports. A photo posted on X by Israel Hayom showed settlement mayor Yair Chetboun with Mr Johnson and the Speaker's wife after apparently having planted a tree. Mr Johnson is the highest-ranking US official to visit an Israeli settlement. Marc Zell, chairman of Republicans Overseas Israel, said in a post on X that Mr Johnson had called the West Bank - which he referred to by its biblical name of "Judea and Samaria" - 'the rightful property of the Jewish people'. The Speaker was originally scheduled to visit Israel at the end of June, but that was derailed by the air war between Israel and Iran. The private visit was organised by a pro-Israel advocacy group, Axios reported, quoting Israeli officials. He was accompanied on his visit to Israel by a group of Republican members of Congress. The group held a meeting with Defence Minister Israel Katz, who thanked them for their 'unwavering support and moral clarity in standing with Israel against its enemies'. Mr Johnson's office did not immediately respond to The National' s request for comment. The Palestinian Foreign Ministry condemned the visit, calling it 'a blatant violation of international law, international legitimacy resolutions, and the Arab and US efforts to stop the war, halt the cycle of violence, and achieve calm'. The ministry said the visit was a 'clear contradiction with the declared US position regarding settlements and settlers' attacks'. It added that it views the visit as 'an encouragement of settlement crimes, settlers' actions, and the confiscation of Palestinian lands. Mr Johnson, a Republican and supporter of US President Donald Trump, has frequently voiced strong support for Israel. While American politicians have visited Israeli settlements in the past, this is the first time a Speaker of the House – third in line of the presidential succession – has done so. Former secretary of state Mike Pompeo visited a winery in the West Bank in 2020. Israeli settlements in Palestinian territories are considered to be illegal under international law. Under former president Joe Biden, the US described settlements as 'illegitimate' and imposed sanctions on several Israeli settlers, freezing their US assets and barring Americans from dealing with them following growing reports of violence by settlers against Palestinians – including American citizens. Mr Trump reversed those sanctions soon after taking office.


Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Exclusive: UK pushed Arab states to condemn Hamas in UN conference statement
Britain strongly pushed for a United Nations conference statement to demand the disarmament of Hamas and its withdrawal from Gaza, Middle East Eye has learnt. A UN conference in New York last week, attended by more than 100 countries and co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, aimed to advance momentum for a two-state solution. The New York Declaration, released afterwards, demands that Hamas end its rule over Gaza and hand its weapons to the Palestinian Authority. Numerous diplomatic sources told MEE the UK was pivotal in pushing for these demands to be included in the statement, as well as the inclusion of strong language condemning the Hamas attack on Israel on 7 October 2023. The statement marked the first time that Arab League states have end0rsed such positions at the UN. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters It was described as "both historic and unprecedented" by French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot. He hailed that for "the first time" Arab and Middle Eastern countries "condemn Hamas, condemn 7 October, call for its disarmament, call for its exclusion from any form of participation in the governance of Palestine, and clearly express their intention to maintain normalised relations with Israel in the future and to join Israel and the future state of Palestine in a regional organisation". MEE has contacted the British Foreign Office for comment. UK and France to recognise Palestinian statehood During the conference, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced that the UK intends to recognise Palestinian statehood in September, following France's commitment that it would do so days earlier. Barring a dramatic diplomatic reversal, France and Britain will become the first G7 countries to recognise Palestine. But these moves, and the UN conference, are unlikely to create any significant momentum towards a two-state solution. Will the UK recognising the State of Palestine make any difference? Read More » Neither the US nor Israel attended the conference, which the US State Department described as a "publicity stunt" that would "prolong the war, embolden Hamas, and reward its obstruction and undermine real-world efforts to achieve peace". France's announcement on 24 July that it would recognise the state of Palestine in September provoked the ire of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who "strongly condemned" what he called a decision that "rewards terrorism". On 23 July, the Israeli parliament passed a non-binding motion calling on the Israeli government to annex the occupied West Bank. And on 4 August, unnamed sources close to Netanyahu briefed local media that he is now pushing for the full occupation of the besieged Gaza Strip. Channel 12 quoted "senior figures in the Prime Minister's Office" as saying: "The decision has been made, Israel is heading towards the occupation of the Gaza Strip." This would involve expanding ground operations into areas where captives are believed to be held, and into locations where Israeli troops have not operated for over a year, including western Gaza City and the central refugee camps. In these circumstances, a viable Palestinian state is highly unlikely to materialise.