Iran's shameful hostage diplomacy
The first visit did not take place until 200 days after their arrest. At times, there were as many as 11 months between visits. These meetings are typically brief – about 10 minutes – and are held in the presence of French-speaking guards. All these restrictions of consular rights, which prompted France to file a case against Iran at the International Court of Justice, are unacceptable in themselves.
Diplomats who met with the two teachers, arrested the day before they were due to leave Tehran at the end of a 10-day sightseeing trip during the Easter holidays, witnessed their distress, caused by extremely harsh detention conditions that French authorities have equated with torture.
Imprisoned separately and kept in isolation, they have been denied access to reading and writing materials. Their communication with the outside world has been limited and made unpredictable. Paris has been left unable to properly see after losing his glasses, which he has been unable to replace. In October 2022, both were forced to make videotaped "confessions" in which they claimed they had sought to "prepare the overthrow of the Iranian regime" on behalf of the French intelligence services.
Dark machinations
In recent days, Kohler and Paris have been accused of espionage on behalf of Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, as well as of conspiracy and corruption. As far-fetched as the first set of charges, these new accusations are even more serious, as they carry the death penalty. They are part of an intensified crackdown by the embattled dictatorship and a hunt for Israeli agents following the strikes carried out by Israel and the US against Iranian nuclear facilities starting June 13. After the bombing of Evin prison, the two French citizens were transferred to other detention sites, and their whereabouts are currently unknown.
Kohler and Paris are, of course, innocent. The teachers have nothing to do with the dark machinations that the Iranian regime claims to involve them in to fuel its hatred of the West; they do not belong in prison. Like some 20 other Europeans or dual nationals who are imprisoned, and like the six other French hostages whom Paris has managed to free one at a time through extremely difficult negotiations since 2020, they are being used as pawns by Tehran to put pressure on their governments – a vile and grim oxymoron known as hostage diplomacy.
On July 3, President Emmanuel Macron threatened Iran with "retaliatory measures" if the charges against Kohler and Paris were upheld. The Europeans notably have the option of reimposing international sanctions that were eased after the 2015 agreement on Iran's nuclear program. The extreme tensions surrounding this topic will not make matters easier, but securing the release of Kohler and Paris must remain a priority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU Parliament confidence vote: Where parties stand on von der Leyen
The majority of the political groups of the European Parliament will not back the vote of no-confidence tabled against von der Leyen's European Commission, but even those from the coalition that voted her into office last year reproached her leadership, and some groups are split over how to vote. After the debate held in the hemicycle on Monday, some of the eight groups of the Parliament clearly staked their position ahead of the vote, while others were more ambiguous, and not all MEPs align with their groups. The European People's Party (EPP), Ursula von der Leyen's political force, is fully behind her. "We will vote unanimously against", said Manfred Weber, chair of the group. The EPP has painted the vote as the emanating from far right MEPs friendly to Russian President Vladimir Putin. "With this motion of censure, we are wasting time: Putin will be happy of what his friends are doing here. I know the German AfD (Alternative for Germany) and the Romanian AUR (Alliance for Unity of Romanians) are the puppets of Putin. This motion of censure is against the security of the Europeans," Weber said during the debate. Criticism of von der Leyen on display Socialists and democrats (S&D), Renew Europe and Greens/EFA groups have also said they will not vote to censure, but that didn't stop their chairs criticising von der Leyen for treating with the right wing parties, ignoring important policy files and leading the Commission with an extremely centralised and opaque working style. 'This motion will not count with the vote in favour of my group. We will not give a single vote to those who want to destroy the European Union,' said S&D leader Iratxe García Pérez, describing the motion of censure as a "reactionary assault". But García Pérez also blamed von der Leyen for backsliding on the Green Deal when she allied with conservatives to withdraw the Commission's controversial directive on green claims, which is meant to address greenwashing. Besides, not supporting the motion does not necessarily equate to a pledge that the Socialists will vote against it. According to sources from the Parliament, the group's members could also abstain. "We have not decided yet, we will discuss the issue in the next days before the vote," S&D Belgian MEP Estelle Ceulemans told Euronews after a group internal meeting. Renew Europe also clearly stated that it opposed the motion of censure. "The motion itself shows the bad intentions of the signatories: a mishmash of allegations on Pfizer text messages, the spending of the Recovery Facility, defence plans and supposed election interference," a statement from the group read. Renew Europe's president, Valérie Hayer, doubled down on this during her intervention, but she too took the opportunity to take a swipe at von der Leyen. "The Commission is too centralised, too fossilised", she said. The Greens/EFA group is set to reject the motion of censure, with all its MEPs voting against, abstaining, or not showing up on the day of the vote, according to internal sources. The leader of the group, Bas Eickhout called the motion 'one big political show of the far-right to undermine democracy.' But he also lashed out at recent tie ups over voting between the EPP and the far-right. 'You are feeding that beast, and at a certain moment the beast will eat you,' Eickhout said, directing his glance at EPP President Weber. The Left's co-President Martin Schirdewa said his group opposes the motion of censure because it refuses "to be instrumentalised by right-wing extremists". But others within the group don't appear to be on the same page. The Italian Five Stars Movement, for example, will vote in favour: "Millions of citizens who believe in the EU, in democracy and in social justice are asking us today to send von der Leyen home", a statement from the party said. The Left's Irish MEPs are also set to vote in favour, according to Parliament sources. Conservatives split on the vote, far right united The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) illustrate this shaky group dynamic more clearly: some of its members proposed and actively promoted the vote of confidence, while others are set to defend the Commission. Officially, the group will leave its lawmakers to follow their consciences with a free vote, and the largest national delegations are in opposite camps. Romanians from ultra-nationalist party AUR and Polish from Law and Justice (PiS) are among the signatories of the motion of censure, consistently with a long tradition of hard criticism against von der Leyen and her college. On the other side, the members of Brothers of Italy will not vote in favour of the motion, as this would entail the resignation of all Commissioners, including Italy's Raffaele Fitto, Commission Executive Vice-President for Cohesion and Reforms, who comes from the party's ranks. "This motion is doomed to failure, not even getting close to the required threshold [to topple the Commission]. This is a gift to our political opponents," ECR co-chair Nicola Procaccini said during his intervention. Patriots for Europe (PfE) and Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN), the two more radical right groups in the Parliament, will vote in favour of the motion, requesting the Commission to resign. "The Pfizergate has been an abuse of power: you have acted alone, out of any democratic framework", Fabrice Leggeri, a French National Rally MEP, said during the debate, while ESN's leader René Aust from Alternative for Germany, said his group intended to send von der Leyen "to an undeserved retirement". A symbolic vote The vote of no-confidence has very little chance of being approved, as at least two-thirds of the votes cast representing a majority of all MEPs would need to back the motion of censure for it to be adopted. But Monday's debate gave an indication of the level of distrust for Von der Leyen in the parliament, regardless of MEP's political affiliation. The parties from the so-called "centrist majority" (EPP, S&D, Renew Europe) are split on the assessment of the Commission's track record so far. While the EPP group fully endorses von der Leyen's political line (and is probably also behind it), Socialists and liberals are at odds with it, signalling that the coalition which saw von der Leyen voted in as President of the Commission one year back is on shaky ground. In this respect, S&D's leader García Pérez addressed EPP President Weber at the end of her intervention: "This motion is the direct result of your strategy in the Parliament. You are asking for responsibility while you negotiate your policies with the far right. We cannot go on like this," she said. The vote on the motion on Thursday 10 will probably testify to the level of discontent. A large number of abstentions might save the necks of the Commissioners, but also simultaneously inflict a political flesh wound on von der Leyen.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Is the EU doing enough to integrate Ukrainian defence tech?
Just before launching its EU presidency last week, Denmark inked a €67 million agreement with Ukraine to let their defence companies build their designs on Danish soil - the first of its kind. 'This is a major contribution to Ukraine's fight for freedom, as well as to the Danish and European armament,' Morten Bødskov, Denmark's minister of industry, business and financial affairs, said in a press release last month. This first deal between Ukraine and Denmark will 'ensure a higher degree of integration' for Ukraine in Europe's wider rearmament, the statement continued. The agreement comes a month after Ukraine launched an international joint weapons production programme with its allied countries to build 'licensed production lines for Ukrainian weapons in partner countries'. But do these recent efforts go far enough? How are European countries building Ukrainian tech? There are already several projects in play between Ukraine and private industry in Europe, such as the UK's production of the Raybird surveillance drone, a 'flexible fixed-wing' 20-kilogram drone that can be deployed in under 25 minutes and can fly for roughly 28 hours over a 2,500-kilometre range. A French auto manufacturer will produce first-person view (FPV) drones in Ukraine, with France's armed forces minister Sebastien Lecornu calling it a 'win-win partnership' in French media. Le Monde reported that automaker Renault was approached for this work. Sweden's SAAB, Norway's Kongsberg, French-German KNDS, Germany's Rheinmetall, and the US's Raytheon are reportedly expanding their presence on the ground, according to a June press release from Ukraine's ministry of defence. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Monday that his country struck more deals with European allies and a leading US defence company to 'step up drone production'. Zelenskyy didn't name the businesses in his address. Euronews Next has followed up with the Ukrainian government to find out more about the deals that have been signed but did not receive a reply at the time of publication. Ukraine is also working on draft legislation for joint weapons production with allies that should be put to a vote in their parliament later this month, according to Rustem Umerov, Ukraine's defence minister. The programme includes plans to create a special legal and tax framework to help Ukrainian defence manufacturers scale up and modernise production, including building new facilities at home and abroad, Umerov said. 'We are not included in the common planning' These projects are a promising first step but Ukraine is still not included in the 'common planning' that the European Union is doing regarding its rearmament, said Olena Bilousova, senior research lead of military at the Kyiv School of Economics. She added that American-made M982 Excalibur shells dropped in efficiency to reach their targets from 70 per cent to six per cent as Russia continues to advance its electronic warfare (EW). This is a form of artillery that the EU has sent to Ukraine in the past. 'There are a lot of cases like that when we understand that the weapons which were common and still common in procurement of the EU should be reviewed [or] at least … modernised,' she told Euronews Next. Ukraine's reliance on drones as a 'cheap solution' in its offensives against Russia is also misunderstood by Ukraine's allies, Bilousova added, noting that the country should be able to build drone procurement strategies with its partners. It doesn't mean that Europe should be focused only on procuring drones, Bilousova continued, but that Ukraine should develop with them 'new strategies around conventional weapons,' including how many are needed and how they can be protected against drones. Bilousova said Ukraine could also teach Europe how to speed up the development of new battle-tested technologies based on their model. Ukraine uses the 'Danish model' of military procurement to develop a new technology from idea to product testing on the battlefield, which takes anywhere from three to six months, compared to traditional weapons procurement, which usually takes up to 18 months. Ukraine can do this through earmarking an estimated $30.8 billion (€29.4 billion) in 2023 for the war effort, a level that is 20 times higher than the pre-2022 invasion level, a recent report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute found. Crowdfunding through platforms such as United24 has also raised over $1 billion (€950 million) and distributed approximately $930 million (€884.61 million) of that to the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the last three years. Both pots of money are then redistributed to Brave1, a 'united coordinational platform' that provides more than 470 grants worth an estimated 1.3 billion hryvnias (€29 million). Pan-European approach to Ukraine defence tech 'unlikely' Bilousova said it's not clear what forum would be the best to bring in Ukraine as a 'consultant' for rearmament. But a pan-European initiative to get Ukraine fully integrated into rearmament might not be possible because time is 'of the essence,' said Jacob Kirkegaard, senior fellow with the Bruegel think tank. 'The vast majority of this integration will happen at the bilateral level and will be driven by Ukraine's desperate need for more weapons and the willingness by many member states … to provide the money,' he told Euronews Next. 'That is not, unfortunately, a capability that the EU has as a whole'. However, it doesn't stop the Commission from identifying 'target projects' that would be of shared interest with Ukraine, such as developing advanced air defence, drone surveillance for subsea internet cables or cybersecurity, Kirkegaard continued. The EU has already activated a €150 billion "SAFE" loan instrument that lets states borrow money for joint defence projects. At least 65 per cent of the weapons' components have to be sourced from within the EU or Ukraine. It's also launched a joint EU-Ukraine task force to integrate Ukraine into the 'defence-tech ecosystem'. However, Bilousova said that if the Commission doesn't step back and create a longer-term plan, the weapons it invests in could be 'ineffective' and delayed for the next conflict. 'I think it is always a good time to make a strategy even if war is already in place,' she said.
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Netanyahu nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he is nominating US President Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize during a dinner at the White House as the two leaders celebrated their recent joint military operations against Iran's nuclear facilities which they have both defined as a total success. Netanyahu presented Trump with a nominating letter he said he sent to the Nobel committee, 'He's forging peace as we speak, one country and one region after the other.' Accompanied by their senior advisers for a dinner in the White House Blue Room, the leaders also discussed the war in Gaza and efforts to push for a 60-day ceasefire proposal to pause the conflict. The call for the peace prize follows years of pressure from the Israeli leader on Trump and his predecessors to take military action against Iran's nuclear programme. Trump responded by ordering US forces to deploy 'bunker-buster' bombs and launch a barrage of Tomahawk missiles on three key Iranian nuclear sites. The nomination also helped Netanyahu strengthen his rapport with Trump, who has long been open about his desire for a Nobel Peace Prize and his self-image as an effective peacemaker. Trump has proudly highlighted recent truces his administration brokered between India and Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, as well as Israel and Iran. 'Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful,' Trump said to Netanyahu as the prime minister handed him the nomination letter. However, Netanyahu's seemingly triumphant White House visit — his third this year — is overshadowed by Israel's ongoing war against Hamas in Gaza and uncertainty over how strongly Trump will push for a resolution to the conflict.
