Volkswagen ID.3 GTX: Can it finally deliver on the EV hot-hatch promise?
Year
:
2025
Fuel
:
Electric
Verdict
:
Not the electric GTi some might expect – but good value all the same
Cast your mind back to 2019, when Frankfurt still had a motor show and the buzz at VW centred on a new model billed as delivering the 'third chapter' in VW's brand-defining cars. It follows in the tread marks of the Beetle and Golf:
the ID.3
was meant to be their spiritual electric successor.
VW was adamant the Golf would remain in production, but as we moved to EVs en masse, the ID.3 was clearly meant to eclipse it.
For multiple reasons, that never happened. The Golf remains the second most popular model in VW's line-up in Ireland, after the
Tiguan
. Last year they sold four times as many Golfs as ID.3s. It's the same story so far this year.
And it's not just because the ID.3 is electric. VW is selling three times as many
ID.4s
as ID.3s this year.
READ MORE
It seems the price walk to the larger EV makes it too tempting to move up the range. The Germans were probably hoping a minor facelift and an update to the ID.3 last year could revive its fortunes. Alas, the sales figures aren't showing any upswing.
Enter the GTX version, trading on the brand's heritage of creating hot hatches that stretch back to the mid-1970s.
There have already been GTX variants offered on other models, largely based around aesthetic styling touches rather than outright performance.
Volkswagen ID.3 GTX
Added features on this GTX include sport shock absorption, 20-inch alloys and some GTX detailing across the car. Performance Plus adds DCC shocks, plus what VW refers to as 'progressive steering' and 'adaptive chassis control'. You also get a rear-view camera, sports seats and a Harman Kardon sound system.
The GTX gets the biggest battery in the ID.3 range, which starts with a 52kWh and goes up to this 79kWh pack.
It claims an official range of 595km, but we found in reality it was closer to 500km, which is still quite impressive and certainly enough to leave most owners only charging up twice a week.
We were averaging 16.2kWh/100km, which is within the official consumption range. That's despite quite a lot of motorway driving during the week.
Volkswagen ID.3 GTX
On a trip to Cork, we needed only one stop at a fast-charger; in just over 30 minutes – the time it took to grab a coffee and sandwich, plus read a few emails – the GTX's battery pack was back up at 80 per cent. This VW can take a DC charge up to 185kW, but even when it was tapering off – as it came close to 96 per cent fully charged – it was still claiming to add 5km per minute on the 150kW ESB charger.
So it has commendable range, but what about performance? That's where the GTX comes a little unstuck.
Weighing in at nearly 2½ tonnes, we had our doubts about its ability. Yet a 0-100km/h time of 5.7 seconds showed great promise. And we know that the VW Group can create sharp electric cars, albeit under the Cupra badge, it's affordable Audi sports brand based in Barcelona.
At the heart of the GTX is the 326hp electric motor powering the rear wheels. This is the same motor that drives the impressive
ID.7
, and it's a punchier power source than the motor used in the ID.3 Pro, offering good pep when you plant the accelerator.
Volkswagen ID.3 GTX
What's admirable is the way it delivers its power: not the hooligan surge you get from some unrefined performance rivals from new Chinese brands. It's smooth, manageable and ever-so-slightly restrained – unless you opt for Sport driving mode, in which case that lunging and lurching acceleration is to the fore – and your passengers are reaching for the sick bags.
Another admirable trait is the suspension set-up. Retuned springs and dampers give it a sportier, more agile feel than the rather numb ID.3 to which we've become accustomed. This combined with more direct steering feel, makes the GTX the best driving variant of this hatchback to be built by VW to date.
Volkswagen ID.3 GTX
And with power coming through the rear wheels, you avoid the cursed torque steer that ruins the control of many fast EVs.
The suspension nicely balances power delivery with comfortable dynamics, so your spine doesn't get jolted with every pothole, but neither do you lean into every bend. It's a relatively fast car that's easy to drive.
The key word here is relatively, for there is a high-performance car that offers far more of the thrills and excitement evoked by the term hot hatch – only it's built in Korea. As with many market segments these days, an Asian brand has stolen Europe's thunder. The
Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
is now the benchmark for how EVs can evolve the hot hatch format for the new age.
At the Hyundai's heart is a software set-up delivering a simulated transmission and hypnotic acoustic soundtrack that encapsulates the addictive essence of hot hatches. The GTX just can't match it.
True, there's a gulf in price difference between these cars, but it would have been great if the GTX could embrace a little more of that passion and a little less of the point-and-click format of a regular EV.
Volkswagen ID.3 GTX
And then there is also a car that just shades this VW in terms of driving fun at a similar price: its close cousin, the Cupra Born VZ.
The good news is that work is also well under way in Wolfsburg to create a fully electric Golf GTi, with VW chief executive Thomas Schafer promising it will be 'a monster car', while an electric Golf R is also on the cards.
For now the GTX offers an impressive balance of performance and range, combined with all the practicality of a large hatchback. It's also well-priced. I just wish it had a touch more thrill and passion. For that we'll probably have to wait for the electric Golf GTi, which leaves us wondering about the point of this GTX, a variant of a model that has failed to live up to the initial hype.
Lowdown: Volkswagen ID.3 GTX Performance Plus
Power
A 326hp (240kW) electric motor with single speed auto delivering a maximum torque of 560Nm and garnering power from a 79kWh net battery pack
0-100km/h
5.7 seconds
Energy consumption
16.5 kWh/100km (WLTP)
Range
595km (WLTP)
Price
€41,258 as tested. GTX Performance Plus starts at €39,025 (after subsidies) ID.3 range starts at €31,780
Our rating
3/5.
Verdict
Not the electric GTi some might expect – but good value all the same
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Student accommodation developer challenges decision to rezone land near UCD to open space
Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown Council's decision to rezone lands owned by a student accommodation developer from residential to open space was done for valid planning reasons, the High Court has been told. The council made the argument in defending an action brought by developer Colbeam Ltd, which is challenging the local authority's 2022-2028 county development plan arising from the rezoning decision. Colbeam has sought to build a 698-bed student accommodation complex at Our Lady's Grove, Goatstown Road, Dublin 14, which is about 850 metres from University College Dublin (UCD). The developer previously secured planning permission from An Coimisiún Pleanála for the development, but this decision was quashed following a separate, successful High Court challenge. READ MORE Colbeam had bought the site in 2017 from the Congregation of the Religious of Jesus and Mary for €13 million. The land – which had been part of a wider campus that includes Our Lady's Grove primary and secondary school – was zoned residential under the council's 2016-2022 county development plan, which was in effect at the time of the purchase, Colbeam has said. But before adopting the 2022-2028 county development plan, councillors adopted motions to rezone Colbeam's land from residential to open space. On Thursday, David Browne SC, for the council, said councillors adopted motions to rezone primarily for planning-based reasons. These included consideration for open space at the Our Lady's Grove campus and concerns about incremental development on that space. Colbeam has argued that councillors had regard for 'irrelevant consideration' in adopting the motions to rezone. But Mr Browne said that if the principal reason for the rezoning decision was a planning one then that was a valid decision. Mr Brown said certain remarks made by councillors in debating the rezoning motions were indicative of 'marginal' considerations in the decision to rezone and should not invalidate the decision. On Wednesday, Neil Steen SC, for Colbeam, had argued that councillors had regard for 'irrelevant consideration' in adopting the motions to rezone. One of these irrelevant considerations arose from purported comments made at the meeting by Fine Gael councillor Barry Saul, one of the members who initially proposed to rezone the land. In advancing the argument to rezone the lands, Cllr Saul referred to 'a failure of moral obligation' on the part of the Congregation of the Religious of Jesus and Mary to maintain a required level of open space on their lands, Mr Steen said. The open space requirement arose from an 'institutional land' designation. Mr Steen said Mr Saul made it explicit that part of his intention in supporting the rezoning was to address this 'failure'. Counsel said moral obligation was an irrelevant consideration in the decision to rezone. Mr Steen said his clients were entitled under legislation to a decision uncontaminated by irrelevant considerations. He said if the court found councillors took an irrelevant consideration into account in making the decision to rezone then the decision should be quashed. Mr Justice David Holland will give his ruling at later date.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Evergreen corporate taxes insulate public finances from trade turmoil
Analysts have been monitoring the Department of Finance 's monthly exchequer numbers like hawks. Any sign of a slowdown in multinational profitability as a result of US tariffs and/or a weakening global economy is likely to manifest in Ireland's corporate tax numbers. Receipts from the business tax generated a record €28 billion last year (excluding the Apple tax money) and are the reason why Ireland is running a sequence of budget surpluses instead of deficits like many of its peers in Europe. In May, corporate tax receipts fell by 30 per cent but department officials brushed off suggestions this was related to the current turmoil around US trade policy, blaming 'once-off factors' instead. READ MORE [ Public finances boosted by another spike in corporate tax receipts Opens in new window ] They were right. The June returns, which we got yesterday, show the tax channel generated €7.4 billion last month, which was €1.5 billion or 25 per cent up on the same month last year. This means that on a cumulative six-month basis, receipts are already up (on last year) by 7.4 per cent at €13.1 billion and headed for another record year-end total of close to €30 billion. Ireland, with its big multinational sector and heavy reliance on exports, is perched rather precariously in the middle of a brewing transatlantic trade war and a global retreat from free trade. But the two big sectors that drive exports and corporate tax here – pharmaceuticals and IT – are outside of US president Donald Trump's current tariff dragnet. And while Trump has threatened to impose tariffs on pharmaceutical imports and/or reduce the sector's relatively high pricing in the US, for now the industry remains highly profitable and the Irish tax numbers reflect that. The June corporate tax numbers, which reflect payments from companies with financial years ending in December (the list includes Google, Meta, Microsoft and Intel) tend to be indicative of the annual trend and the November numbers (the most important month) bode well for the public finances as a whole. 'Unless there is a sharp fall in the economy, it would be reasonably anticipated that there might be a fairly strong November figure,' the department's chief economist John McCarthy said. In an attempt to temper expectations around the seemingly evergreen corporate receipts, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said he expected to see a 'decline' at some point but it could be 'a number of years away'. 'I believe we will see the growth that we've had over the last few years begin to stabilise, and I saw some evidence of that last year when we actually missed our revised corporate tax forecast for 2024 by €1 billion,' he said. His cautious outlook contrasts with that of the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council, which expects receipts from the business tax to rise by about €5 billion from 2026 onwards as additional revenue from the new minimum tax rate of 15 per cent flows in. Several big taxpayers here have also been availing of generous tax-cutting capital allowances that are due to run out, meaning they will be liable to pay more tax – another factor likely to drive receipts. Whether these bumper receipts are being put to good use is a different matter with Donohoe noting there would be €16 billion saved in the two State funds by the end of this year.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Eir seeks £67m in damages from rival BT relating to dispute over NI public sector contract
Irish telecoms giant Eir was kept 'unlawfully in the dark' by its rival BT when tendering for the biggest public sector contract in Northern Ireland, the High Court in London has heard. On the opening day of the hearing, in which Dublin-based Eir is seeking damages from BT of £67 million (€78 million), the background to the long-running dispute was outlined, with Eir's barrister arguing that BT had a 'wealth' of secret information that led to it winning the £400 million contract in 2018. 'Eir went from being one of Northern Ireland's largest public sector players to being marginalised completely from the market ... and BT effectively stepping into their shoes in what was a role reversal,' Eir's barrister, Robert O'Donoghue, KC, said on Thursday. The tender process for the lucrative nine-year Northern Ireland Public Sector Shared Network (NIPSSN) contract ran between April 2016 and March 2018. READ MORE Schools, Stormont departments, health trusts and councils were among 150 organisations who would avail of the service. In 2020, Ofcom, the UK telecoms regulator, fined BT £6.3 million for unlawful anticompetitive practices during the procurement process. During his opening submission, Mr O'Donoghue referenced the Ofcom ruling and 'turbocharged' legal obligations it had previously placed on BT to ensure a level playing field for its competitors. 'Interestingly and prophetically BT objected to this additional obligation at the time,' he told the court. Eir, which is controlled by the French billionaire Xavier Niel, claims that Openreach (the network arm of BT) discriminated against it by failing to provide it with key information on costs and BT's fibre-to-the-premises on-demand product (FOD). BT and Eir were the only two bidders for the contract. For BT to portray its bid team as 'mavericks' in using FOD was 'self-serving nonsense', claimed Mr O'Donoghue, as the product 'is just another type of fibre that has been around many years'. 'The issue was that BT made it difficult to get a handle on costs ... Eir were kept unlawfully in the dark while BT had access to secret information on costs ... and the notion that the BT bid team had uniquely stumbled across some Holy Grail or secret source of FOD is obviously untrue.' The case is listed to run for four weeks. Some 14 witnesses, a 'considerable quantity' of expert material and complex technical background will be detailed, the court heard. 'It must be like staring at the foothills of the Matterhorn at the start of a climb,' Mr O'Donoghue told Judge Adam Johnson. 'But we submit that the points of this case are not actually that complicated, and to a material extent, not actually in dispute. 'The long and the short of it is, that everything matters, is admitted by BT. The starting point is that BT admitted the infringements to Ofcom.' The case continues.
