Kerala HC orders dedicated authority, management plan to save Ashtamudi lake
A division bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that highlighted the deteriorating condition of Ashtamudi Lake, a Ramsar Site of international importance.
The court noted that despite the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 mandating such measures, as of today, therefore, Ashtamudi lacks both a dedicated unit and a specific management plan. The absence of these two crucial components has resulted in haphazard and disjointed efforts, leading to the resultant situation.
The bench stressed that the first and foremost requirement for conserving the lake is 'that a dedicated multi-member unit has to be constituted" and that 'an integrated management plan for Ashtamudi which will be implemented by this Unit" must be prepared.
The court observed that without the plan in place, steps taken for the conservation of Ashtamudi Lake could only be ad hoc and haphazard.
The plan has to identify and address the specific ecological and hydrological conditions of the site, assess threats, propose conservation and restoration actions, and include timelines, budgets, and performance indicators, it said.
The court also noted that pollution from sewage, biomedical waste, and solid waste, along with mangrove destruction caused by encroachment, were major threats to the lake.
In 2023, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) had imposed a Rs 10 crore penalty on the government for failing to protect the lake.
In its final order, the bench issued several binding directions, including the constitution of the Ashtamudi Wetland Management Unit within two months, 'by issuing an official notification in that regard." The first meeting of the Unit is to be held within two months of notification to finalise procedures.
Other directions include the preparation of a Standard Operating Procedure to govern the Unit's functioning, including co-ordination among stakeholders. The state was directed to provide 'necessary office infrastructure, support staff, and funding" for the Unit.
The court said the Unit must have its own website or dedicated web page with public access, including the management plan, its composition, and a feedback mechanism for citizens.
It further stated that the Integrated Management Plan for Ashtamudi must be finalised within six months, in line with regulations, and that an interim management plan must be prepared until the final plan is ready.
All government departments and agencies were directed to extend 'full co-operation" to the Unit.
The court also emphasised the need for public participation, directing that the website should have a 'digital feedback mechanism (web/social media) for the general public to bring to its notice the matters of concern by enabling them to upload/share audio-visual material." The petition was accordingly disposed of, with liberty to the Secretary of the Ashtamudi Wetland Management Unit to approach the court again if further directions are needed. PTI TGB TGB ROH
view comments
First Published:
July 30, 2025, 21:00 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘It will impact states': Karnataka CM after US imposes 25 percent tariff and penalty on India
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on Friday said that the United States' decision to impose a 25 per cent tariff, along with an additional penalty on India for importing oil from Russia, would affect not just the nation but also the individual states. Trump signed a fresh executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including India and Pakistan, in a move that is expected to strain global trade relations further.(PTI) "It will impact the state also, and the whole country at large. I will discuss this issue with the concerned Minister," the Chief Minister told reporters. Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge expressed concern over the development, saying he hoped the central government would re-engage in dialogue with the United States to mitigate the tariff hike. Priyank Kharge said, "This is something that we might have to live with, but we'll see how it impacts. I'm hopeful that the central government will get its act together, get to the negotiating table, and do something practical that ensures the business thrives as usual. Hopefully, this time they'll be able to convince their friend Donald Trump to ensure that the tariffs are not this huge." US President Donald Trump on Wednesday made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25 per cent tariffs against India and threatened an additional "penalty" for importing Russian oil. "I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world." Trump said. Trump signed a fresh executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including India and Pakistan, in a move that is expected to strain global trade relations further. Tariffs imposed on India's neighbouring countries are less than India's 25 per cent, except for Myanmar at 40 per cent. The new tariffs for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, and Sri Lanka are 19%, 15%, 20%, 19%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. The new tariffs, outlined in a sweeping order signed on Friday (IST), will come into effect from 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on August 7. The executive order states that the revised tariffs are aimed at addressing the national emergency declared earlier under Executive Order 14257. Trump noted that he had "recently received, among other things", new information and had determined it "necessary and appropriate" to impose additional ad valorem duties on the goods of certain trading partners. These new duties will replace those previously imposed under the same order, as amended. Other countries on which the US imposed tariffs are higher than India include Iraq (35 per cent), Laos (40 per cent), Libya (30 per cent), Serbia (35 per cent), South Africa (30 per cent), Switzerland (39 per cent), and Syria (41 per cent). Countries that imposed lower tariffs than India include the UK (10 per cent), Vietnam (20 per cent), Taiwan (20 per cent ), and South Korea (15 per cent), to name a few. The order by Trump stated, "I have determined that it is necessary and appropriate to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14257 by imposing additional ad valorem duties on goods of certain trading partners".The executive order further directs that these changes will apply to goods entering the US for consumption or withdrawn from warehouses on or after the effective date. However, goods already in transit before the deadline, loaded on vessels and en route before August 7 and entering the US before October 5, 2025, will not be subjected to the revised duties but will instead continue under the previously applicable tariff rates under the amended Executive Order 14257. The government told the Parliament on Thursday that it is examining the impact of the recent events and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in the lower House of Parliament a day after Trump announced the tariff. He later made a similar statement in the Rajya Sabha. Goyal said the Ministry of Commerce and Industry is holding talks with exporters, industries and all stakeholders and gathering information on their assessment of this issue.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Forced to name Yogi Adityanath, RSS leaders: Malegaon case witness turns hostile
One of the 39 witnesses who turned hostile in the Malegaon 2008 blast case was Milind Joshirao, Trustee of the Abhinav Bharat Trust, who also ran a lift business. Joshirao told the court that ATS officers Shrirao and Param Bir Singh threatened to torture him and coerced him to name Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath and other RSS was picked up by the ATS on October 28, 2008, nearly a month after the blast, and remained in custody until November 7, 2008. He was kept at the ATS office for more than seven days. Despite being a prosecution witness, Joshirao did not support the claims for which he was brought to court, namely, to establish the motive behind the formation of the Abhinav Bharat organisation, allegedly set up by serving army officer Lt. Col. Prasad to the prosecution, a meeting was held in June 2006 at Raigad Fort, attended by Purohit, businessman Ajay Rahirkar, Rakesh Dhawade, and several witnesses, including Milind Joshirao. Dhawade had been discharged by the special court before the trial prosecution claimed that the idea of forming Abhinav Bharat originated with Purohit and was discussed during the Raigad Fort meeting. All attendees reportedly agreed to the proposal and took an oath at the fort to establish Abhinav Bharat and work towards its objectives. The Abhinav Bharat Trust was formed in 2007, according to the was further alleged that the accused aimed to transform India into a 'Hindu Rashtra' called 'Aryavart.' Dissatisfied with the Indian Constitution, they allegedly planned to create their own, form a government in exile and train individuals in guerrilla warfare. The group allegedly intended to eliminate those opposing the formation of a 'Hindu Rashtra'. Purohit was accused of collecting Rs 21 lakh to fund these Public Prosecutor Avinash Rasal cross-examined Joshirao after he was declared hostile by the court. However, even during cross-examination, Joshirao did not make any statements that supported the prosecution's case. He specifically denied attending the Raigad Fort meeting or that any oath was taken to create a separate 'Hindutva Vadi Rashtra'.Instead, he stated, "ATS treated me like an accused and kept me for seven days at their office. The officers pressured me to name five RSS individuals, including Yogi Adityanath, Asimanand, Indresh Kumar, Professor Devdhar, Sadhvi, and Kakaji, in my statement. They assured me I would be released if I did so. When I refused, DCP Shrirao and Additional Commissioner of Police Param Bir Singh threatened me with torture,' as noted by Judge judge further observed that Joshirao's statement 'was written down/recorded solely by an ATS officer.'Considering his testimony in court, the judge stated, 'It clearly indicates that the statement was involuntary. Even if the contents of such a statement are proven by the investigating officer, it may still be insufficient, as it raises doubts regarding its admissibility and the authenticity of such an involuntary statement.'- Ends
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Will notify Southern Ridge for full protection without ground verification: Delhi govt tells NGT
The Delhi government will now issue a final notification granting complete protection to the Southern Ridge without conducting the previously planned ground verification, the state forest and wildlife department has informed in an affidavit to the National Green Tribunal. Delhi's Ridge areas have already been notified under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act. However, the final notification under Section 20 is yet to be completed, which grants complete protection and defines the boundaries. (HT FILE) The change in stance comes a week after the department had said that it will carry out the verification across 12 south Delhi villages in the next six months. The timeline for the notification will be shared with NGT, the department added in the affidavit dated July 31. The issue has been a long-pending one. During a hearing on July 25, the amicus curiae in the case argued that it has been four years since the NGT sought notification of the southern Ridge. On a plea filed by activist Sonya Ghosh, the NGT, in January 2021 directed the Delhi government to ensure that the notification under Section 20 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927is issued within three months. Ghosh in 2024 filed an executive application, seeking compliance with the 2021 order. Delhi's Ridge areas have already been notified under Section 4 of the Indian Forest Act. However, the final notification under Section 20 is yet to be completed, which grants complete protection and defines the boundaries. On July 23, the forest department had said it plans to carry out on-ground verification of 3,287 hectares of land across 12 villages in south Delhi by January next year before the issuance of the final notification. On Thursday, a bench headed by NGT chairperson took on-record the changed stance of the forest department during a hearing. 'Learned Counsel appearing for Delhi government and the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) has now submitted that a decision has been taken that no ground verification will be done for issuing the final notification under Section 20 in respect of Phase-1,' the bench said, stating the Delhi government had sought time to submit a fresh timeline for issuing the final notification. The matter will now be heard on August 7. Delhi has four prominent Ridge areas, with the total area under the Ridge as reserved forests totalling around 7,784 hectares. The largest – the southern Ridge is spread over an area of 6,200 hectares.
