France plans to send criminals to prison in South America
In an interview carried by Le Journal du Dimanche on Saturday, French Justice Minister Gerald Darmanin revealed that he plans to build France's third-most secure prison 7,000 miles away from Paris in the French overseas territory of Guiana, where he was visiting when the interview took place.
The move has sparked an outcry from local officials and residents.
Darmanin says the 500-inmate facility will house drug traffickers and "Islamic radicals" in the northeast of South America.
Guiana, also known as French Guiana, is the only part of mainland South America that is still governed by a European nation.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The $607m facility is supposed to open in 2028. It will be built in an isolated location surrounded by a thick forest of trees in the Amazon rainforest in the region of Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni, a town bordering Suriname, which once received prisoners shipped there by Napoleon III in the 19th century.
Some of these prisoners were also sent to the French penal colony of Cayenne, commonly known as Devil's Island, off the coast of French Guiana, which operated between 1852 and 1952 and was only closed in 1953.
Darmanin told Le Journal du Dimanche that the prison also aims to prevent drug traffickers from having contact with their criminal networks, limited contact with the outside world, regular searches, and constant electronic surveillance.
Baz Dreisinger, a professor at John Jay College of criminal justice in New York, who wrote Incarceration Nations: A Journey to Justice in Prisons Around the World, told Middle East Eye that current incarceration policies were not being discussed enough.
'This banishment of people from one country to a prison in another is part of a long history of penal colonies and the fantasy you can exorcise and rid yourself of so-called criminals, normally poor people and undesirables of whatever variety. There's a long history of this. It is not a new thing."
Dreisenger added that this is an "act of political theatre", as these countries are more than able to imprison people in their own lands.
'Of course, I think it's influenced by Trump - his conversation of reopening Alcatraz and sending people to the prison in El Salvador. A lot is being shaped by US domestic policy.'
Cecot in El Salvador can hold up to 40,000 prisoners and is meant for permanent exile and permanent punishment. El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele bills the prison as the biggest in the Americas. It is also where the Trump administration has sent more than 200 Venezuelan migrants. It is described as a black hole from which no information escapes.
The French justice ministry had not responded to a request for comment by the time of publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Harvard battles Trump administration in court over $2.6bn funding cut
Harvard University took its fight against the Trump administration to a federal court on Monday, arguing that its decision to cut $2.6bn in funding was illegal. US district judge Allison Burroughs heard arguments from both sides in Boston, Massachusetts, in what is known as a summary judgment in the civil case. Harvard is arguing that while it acknowledges there have been instances of antisemitism on campus, there is no link between antisemitism and the vital medical and scientific research the university undertakes. Instead, the Ivy League school says it is being pressured into capitulating to the government's demands, arguing that its First Amendment rights are being violated. "This case involves the government's efforts to use the withholding of federal funding as leverage to gain control of academic decisionmaking at Harvard," the university said in its complaint. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "All told, the tradeoff put to Harvard and other universities is clear: allow the government to micromanage your academic institution or jeopardize the institution's ability to pursue medical breakthroughs, scientific discoveries, and innovative solutions." Meanwhile, the government is arguing that the funding freeze is justified because Harvard has not sufficiently tackled antisemitism on campus. Whilst Burroughs didn't issue a ruling at Monday's hearing, US President Donald Trump still chose to call her a "TOTAL DISASTER." Burroughs issued an injunction in June to prevent the government from banning international students from attending the university. He noted she ruled in favour of Harvard in the past, saying they would appeal any unfavourable outcomes. "When she rules against us, we will IMMEDIATELY appeal, and WIN," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'Real-life consequences' The lawsuit, originally filed in April to challenge the $2.6bn federal funding freeze, marked an escalation in Harvard's fight to maintain academic autonomy in the face of the Trump administration's demands. In a letter to the Harvard community at the time, the university's president, Alan M Garber, said the administration's "illegal demands" would impose "unprecedented and improper control over the university". Garber also said the administration's threats would have "stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the standing of American higher education in the world". What really happened at college campuses according to Jewish students Read More » In its complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, the university said that within hours of receiving a funding freeze, the university began receiving stop work orders which "put vital medical, scientific, technological, and other research at risk', as well as news that the government was planning to pull an additional $1bn of funding for health research. The complaint also said the government had threatened to terminate $8.7bn in federal funding to five hospitals in Boston - "independent corporate entities" that are "not under Harvard's control", calling it an arbitrary decision. More critically, it said that the government "has not - and cannot - identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological, and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security, and maintain America's position as a global leader in innovation." Medical research said to be in jeopardy includes improving the prospects of children who survive cancer, understanding at the molecular level how cancer spreads throughout the body, and predicting the spread of infectious disease outbreaks. The court case is the latest chapter of the tussle between Harvard University and the government. The university is also taking the government to court after it revoked the institution's ability to host international students.
Gulf Today
5 hours ago
- Gulf Today
UAE is a strategic priority, says Philippine official
An island-province in the Sulu archipelago of the Philippines is taking the lead as the next miracle in East Asia. This is Basilan, which, alongside Maguindanao, Lanao del Sur, Sulo and Tawi-Tawi comprise the 4.4 million-populated Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM). Its main inhabitants are the indigenous Yakans, descendants of early Papuan settlers, that welcomed this year, the Shariah-compliant Sulo Barakah Ventures (SBV) 'for inclusive economic growth that can break cycles of intergenerational poverty and secure lasting peace.' Justine Lyris Bacay told Gulf Today that SBV 'adheres' to the globally-accepted standards of the 1991-established Bahrain-based not-for-profit organisation (NPO) Sharia Standards of the Accounting and Auditing Organisation for Islamic Financial Institutions: 'Our Sharia Supervisory Board ensures all investments comply with Islamic jurisprudence. While the specific external Shariah scholars or firms that will formally approve our compliance are part of our ongoing process as we complete local fundraising and plan the Abu Dhabi Fund for Development incorporation, our commitment to rigorous Shariah vetting is absolute.' 'Our commitment to Shariah compliance is fundamental. It is woven into the very fabric of our investment philosophy and operations. We ensure that every investment from foreign and domestic investors is halal, aligning with Islamic finance principles and our investors' values,' Bacay added. The World Economic Forum (WEF)-Maritime Southeast Asia Community champion/former Deloitte Central Europe risk consultant is the SBV chief operating officer. She and the other SBV officers were in the UAE recently. They presented their programme to Philippine Ambassador Alfonso Ferdinand Ver and Consul General in Dubai and the Northern Emirates Marford Angeles. The other SBV officials are board chairman Maria Antonia Odelia Arroyo, chief executive officer Mohammad Taha Basman II and chief economist Assad Baunto. Arroyo was a WEF 2015 Young Global Leader who advised the international organisation. into public-private organisation commitment, on responsible investing for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in 2022. She assisted in the poverty alleviation of 19,465 rice farmers through the Philippine investment company Ignite Impact Fund. Bangsamoro Investment Code co-author Basa, who, like Bacay is an Asian Institute of Management alumnus and through the NPO The Asia Foundation, led projects for the World Bank, United States Agency for International Development and the Australian Government-Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. University of Oxford-Master in Economics degree holder Baunto used to be a World Bank and Asian Development Bank development economist. He has the most extensive work experience in the BARMM. 'The UAE is a strategic priority and a natural initial major stop. Primarily, we plan to incorporate our fund in the Abu Dhabi Global Market after local fundraising. The UAE is a leading Islamic finance hub with robust regulations and significant capital pools, making it an ideal gateway to engage broader Middle Eastern investors,' Bacay said. The SBV officers are optimistic that Basilan and the entire BARRM is the next progressive region 'in Southeast Asia's second fastest growing economy.' Examples given were the exodus of Southeast Asia's number one economy, Singapore, 'from fishing villages to global financial hub,' the 1950s underdeveloped tiny Taiwan to an industrialised nation, and the high-income South Korea, which, 70 years back, was a nearly deforested war-torn impoverished state. Bacay mentioned the 2019 local plebiscite that re-designed the once Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao into BARMM: 'This has provided political stability and institutional frameworks necessary for large-scale investments in its undervalued assets of rubber and seaweed production, marine diversity, first Islamic rural bank, Smart Battery Energy Storage System, renewable energy plant and ferry, broadband satellite internet, bio-processing company, and integrated mangrove mariculture and cultural experience.'
Middle East Eye
6 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defends decision to support military aid for Israel
US Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has come under fire for defending her decision to support a bill which will see more military aid go to Israel's Iron Dome air defence system. The New York lawmaker voted against an amendment by Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene last week that sought to block $500m in Congress' annual defence spending bill for Israel's Iron Dome programme. Fellow Democrats Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar had supported Taylor Greene's amendment, which eventually lost in a 422-6 vote. In a post on X on Saturday, Ocasio-Cortez claimed that Green's amendment did "nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza". "What it does do is cut off defensive Iron Dome capacities while allowing the actual bombs killing Palestinians to continue," she said. "I have long stated that I do not believe that adding to the death count of innocent victims to this war is constructive to its end. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "That is a simple and clear difference of opinion that has long been established. I remain focused on cutting the flow of US munitions that are being used to perpetuate the genocide in Gaza." On Saturday, the Democratic Socialists of America, of which Ocasio-Cortez is a member, said it was crucial that lawmakers backed all-encompassing arm embargoes against Israel, including those concerning defensive weapons. 'While the Congresswoman voted against the defense appropriations bill itself, voting against funding for the imperialist military-industrial complex and the Israeli genocide, we were further deeply disappointed by her clarifying statement on her position on the Iron Dome. AOC faces backlash for crying, but not voting, over bill to fund Israel's Iron Dome Read More » 'Along with other US-funded interceptor systems, the Iron Dome has emboldened Israel to invade or bomb no less than five different countries in the past two years.' DSA said that providing any military aid to Israel while they carried out a genocide with US support is completely unacceptable as it legitimised "its eliminationist campaign against the Palestinian people". "The fact that Representative Ocasio-Cortez acknowledges that Israel is carrying out this genocide makes her support for military aid all the more disappointing and incongruous," DSA continued. On Monday, Ocasio-Cortez faced criticism from members of the public, including at least one person who defaced her campaign office with red paint. A sign was also left outside the building, accusing the congresswoman of funding a genocide in Gaza. The New York native in 2021 faced a deluge of criticism over the Iron Dome defence system, when she cried on the House floor after changing her vote from "no" to "present" on providing $1bn in funding for the defence system. In an open letter after that incident, she said she had changed her vote because she was subject to "hateful targeting".
