Five Malaysians choose to stay in Iran despite evacuation call
REMBAU: Only five Malaysians, including four students and a businessman, have decided to stay in Iran despite the government's evacuation advisory, said Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan.
He confirmed that the evacuation process for Malaysians in Iran concluded on June 21, with most returning home. However, the five individuals signed a letter of undertaking to remain, expressing gratitude to the Malaysian government for its assistance.
'The four students are in Qom and Esfahan, while the businessman is also staying. They have assured us of their safety and decision to remain,' Mohamad told reporters after officiating the 52nd General Meeting of the Kaum Ibu Penajes Cooperative.
Earlier reports indicated that 24 individuals, including Malaysians, arrived safely at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) via Malaysia Airlines flight MH781. The group consisted of 17 Malaysians, six Iranian dependents, and one Singaporean national.
Separately, Mohamad announced Malaysia's collaboration with Indonesia to explore economic development in the maritime border area of Ambalat. He stated that both nations are working towards a joint development agreement to benefit from the region's natural resources.
'Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto are committed to finalising this cooperation, similar to the Gulf of Siam model,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
30 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
MACC faces legal hurdles in global asset freeze pursuit
KUALA LUMPUR: While Malaysian authorities have the legal power to freeze suspected illicit assets through court-issued restraining orders, enforcing those orders abroad is more complex, often requiring separate legal applications in foreign jurisdictions. A legal expert believes the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) may face an uphill battle in its ongoing efforts to trace high-value assets allegedly linked to the late Tun Daim Zainuddin, his family members, and proxies. The challenge lies in cross-border legal procedures, which may require the commission to either file separate court applications in the respective countries or rely on formal mutual legal assistance (MLA) agreements to take action. Former Malaysian Bar Council president Salim Bashir said such restraining orders, issued under Section 44 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLA), were typically the first step in freezing assets suspected of being linked to criminal activities. "A Malaysian court order allows enforcement agencies to request mutual legal assistance from the Attorney General's office of foreign countries, where the assets are located, to trace and enforce the order," he told the New Sunday Times. However, he said not all foreign jurisdictions accepedt Malaysian court orders automatically. "Some countries require a separate application to register the local order before any action can be taken," he said. He added that the feasibility of enforcement depended on the country's legal requirements and whether Malaysia had existing mutual legal assistance (MLA) arrangements with the jurisdiction involved. Salim said that although AMLA gave enforcement agencies and the public prosecutor broad powers, they must still convince the court that the assets were tied to unlawful activities. "The standard is based on the balance of probabilities. There must be cogent evidence, and it must be proven to be credible enough to satisfy the court on the need for a forfeiture order against the assets of an individual." He added that any attempt to seize assets — whether local or foreign — must also comply with Article 13 of the Federal Constitution, which prohibits individuals from being deprived of their property except in accordance with the law. Earlier, it was reported that MACC was now expanding its investigation to five additional countries as it tracked down high-value assets linked to Daim, a former finance minister.
Borneo Post
an hour ago
- Borneo Post
Wrong timing, weak planning: Why businesses are bracing for impact as SST expansion approaches
While aimed at strengthening fiscal resilience, many business associations and industry commentators argue that the move has come at the worst possible time – amid a fragile economic recovery and rising global uncertainties. – Stock photo from Pixabay THE Malaysian government's decision to expand the Sales and Services Tax (SST), set to take effect this July 1, is stirring significant concern across industries as businesses groups sound the alarm on potential impacts on our domestic economy. A tax in troubled times While aimed at strengthening fiscal resilience, many business associations and industry commentators argue that the move has come at the worst possible time – amid a fragile economic recovery and rising global uncertainties. Recent GDP figures reflected this vulnerability as Malaysia's economy grew by 4.4 per cent in the first quarter of 2025, a notable dip from the 4.9 per cent recorded in the final quarter of 2024. The World Bank has also recently revised its 2025 GDP growth forecast for Malaysia downwards from 4.5 per cent to 3.9 per cent, further reinforcing expectations of a slowing domestic economy. Key domestic sectors, including construction and manufacturing, have also begun to slow, while external pressures such as the escalating US-China trade war, US tariffs and escalating geopolitical tensions threaten to further dampen export performance. Amid these headwinds, industry pundits pointed out that the SST expansion risks compounding domestic challenges rather than alleviating them. What's different under 2025 SST expansion? Announced under Budget 2025, the upcoming SST expansion represents a significant widening of the tax base. This includes the expansion of the sales tax to non-essential items such as king crab, salmon, imported fruits, racing bicycles, and antique artworks, while the service tax will now cover a wider spectrum of services such as renting and leasing, construction, financial services, private healthcare, education, and beauty treatments. Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Amir Hamzah Azizan has estimated that the expanded SST will generate RM5 billion in additional revenue in 2025, bringing total SST collection to RM51.7 billion. Of this, RM2.2 billion is expected to come from the sales tax component, while RM2.8 billion from services. Amir Hamzah has emphasized that these changes aim to support government expenditure and social programs without overburdening the lower-income group. Yet, business sentiment seems to paint a different picture. Businesses sound off In a joint statement issued on June 15 by six business associations – the SME Association of Malaysia, Malaysia Retail Chain Association (MRCA), Malaysia Retailers Association (MRA), Bumiputera Retailers Organisation (BRO), Malaysia Shopping Malls Association (PPKM), and the Federation of Malaysian Business Associations (FMBA) have expressed firm opposition to the SST rollout. In particular, the statement criticized the eight per cent service tax on commercial property rentals and leasing services, calling its timing 'gravely misguided'. 'Implementing such a broad-based tax hike amid a fragile recovery will exacerbate inflation, cripple SMEs (small and medium enterprises), discourage investment, and erode consumer confidence,' the consortium said. Already under pressure from cost inflation and sluggish demand, SMEs and retailers who find themselves having to grapple with tighter margins and elevating operating costs may inevitably find themselves having to pass these costs onto consumers which would further reduce household purchasing power and threaten the viability of retail operations. The result, they say, could be widespread downsizing, closures, and job losses – all of which would further weaken the domestic economy. That said, the associations stressed that their opposition is not to the principle of taxation, but rather to the current approach, which they describe as lacking consultation and sensitivity to the current economic realities. Lack of engagement with industries, consumers While the Ministry of Finance had earlier stated that the Royal Malaysian Customs Department was engaging with industry stakeholders to finalise the scope and rate of the tax back in February, the response from many associations suggests otherwise. The Malaysian Iron and Steel Industry Federation (MISIF), for instance, issued a statement on June 20 warning that the SST and the proposed carbon tax would severely undermine the competitiveness of the steel sector especially in the current macroenvironment. MISIF pointed out that over 240 steel-related products – including coking coal, coke, and steel scrap – would be affected. 'These are critical raw materials, and the added cost burden could encourage cheaper imports, discourage local production, and erode Malaysia's manufacturing base.' The association also argued that taxing machinery and equipment contradicts the goals of the New Industrial Master Plan 2030, which emphasizes automation, green steel, and advanced technologies. Moreover, a 10 per cent tax on steel mesh which is widely used in Industrialised Building System (IBS) projects could also slow construction progress, as it shifts contractors away from automation, and increase their reliance on manual labour and foreign workers. Further discord emerged when the Minister of Plantation and Commodities, Datuk Seri Johari Abdul Ghani, announced that his ministry had called for an urgent consultation with stakeholders in the palm oil and oleochemical industries following negative feedback over the imposition of a five per cent SST on oleochemical products. 'I have instructed the ministry to engage with industry players. We want to know specifically which parts are affected. The SST is a taxation system that has already been implemented in our country. 'When receiving significant negative feedback, I said we should not just react; instead, we need to engage with the industry to understand the impact. If it affects competitiveness, only then will we review it,' he told the media after officiating at the Malaysian Palm Oil Board's Technology Transfer Programme 2025 on June 19. While the move indicates a willingness to engage, it also raises questions about the quality and depth of earlier consultations with stakeholders if such an urgent response had to occur. And the chorus of discontent seems to have continued to grow steadily over the last few weeks with associations like the Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM), the Malaysian Rubber Glove Manufacturers Association (Margma), the Real Estate and Housing Developers' Association (Rehda), the Association of Private Hospitals of Malaysia, and the Master Builders Association Malaysia (MBAM) all calling for the SST changes to be delayed, revised, or restructured. Even consumers have pushed back with many questioning certain aspects of the SST expansions like the broad inclusion of imported fruits as they argue that many daily staples are imported. To this end, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim announced on June 26 that the government had decided to 'compromise' and exempt apples and oranges, which are consumed by the masses from the SST expansion. 'Tax reform is not the issue, a lack of strategy is' Commenting on the issue, Hedki Heng, a corporate culture researcher and serial entrepreneur, regarded the reform of the SST as 'not an inherently wrong move, but doing so without a well-communicated strategy is just lazy policy, which may erode the people's trust'. 'We're not unwilling to contribute. We just want to know what we're contributing toward. How long must we bear it? Is it worth it? In an age of uncertainty, every government decision builds or breaks public trust,' he said. 'When we voted for a government promising reform, transparency, and hope, we weren't just asking for salary reviews or tax tweaks. We wanted long-term structural change. 'But instead we what we got was policies that change so frequently both businesses and the rakyat can't plan ahead, rising taxes and falling subsidies with no real measures to boost incomes, vulnerable communities being pushed to breaking point, and a 'tax first, aid later' model that contradicts with the intent to help and disconnects people from policy,' he lamented. He argued that his current 'change first, explain later' attitude towards new policies gambled with the trust of citizens, and 'is the true crisis at hand'. 'There is a collapse in public trust. The more policies we have, the less trust we seem to gain. And when hope is betrayed, disappointment becomes even heavier. 'Please don't let this opportunity for reform become another chapter of national disappointment,' he warned. 'So, what can we do to fix this?' Well, for Heng, the answer seems obvious. 'What we desperately need now is a clear medium-to-long-term fiscal roadmap that will tell us exactly how Malaysia's revenue will be sustained, how our economy will be restructured and what our tangible fiscal goals are. 'Once that's done then, and only then, can we move towards introducing new policies that have been thoroughly studied and discussed with industry stakeholders. 'Every major policy must include clear explanations of who will be affected, how the pain will be cushioned, and what support systems are in place. No more trial-and-error policies with no accountability,' he stressed. And finally, Heng also emphasised that for the people to tighten their belts for fiscal reforms, the government must also lead by example by reforming government linked corporations (GLCs) and trim inefficiency. 'A bloated public sector and excessive spending cannot be the rakyat's burden anymore.' businesses focus lead SST tax
Borneo Post
2 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Speak up! Speak up!
The ability of speaking more than one language is a valuable personal asset. — Photo from I HAVE great admiration for anyone who speaks another language besides his own mother tongue. A friend of mine, an Iban, who sadly had joined his Maker, spoke fluent Mandarin and several other Chinese dialects and also the Sarawak Malay. He also spoke Melanau (the Bintulu variety). There was never a dull moment to be in his company. During a happy occasion such as a wedding reception, someone who proposes a toast laced with good humour in two or more languages can turn a solemn situation into one full of laughter. Even during semi-formal discussions like seminars and workshops, it is always interesting to listen to speakers switching from one language to another at will, and yet, can still be fully understood by everybody else in the room. It's a very effective way of disseminating information, especially where the audience consists of people from various educational backgrounds. A language is only useful when, through it, the message is crystal clear – no ambiguity. If two or three languages could convey the same message, so much the better. An audience consisting of various ethnic groups of individuals with varying standards of literacy would greatly benefit from this sort of situation. Malaysians must appreciate the fact that they are allowed to be multilingual. At one stage in the history of Malaysia, there was an attempt to discourage the publication of literature written in Iban, or any other indigenous Borneo languages. The federal government policy then was that every Malaysian must speak Bahasa Malaysia and write in Bahasa Malaysia only. Over time, it was realised that this strict application of the language policy could not work in a multiracial society like Malaysia. I could have told them that! The unity of a nation does not depend solely on one national language. Switzerland has four national languages: French, German, Italian and Romansch. Politically, it is one of the most stable countries in the world and certainly, one of the richest in Europe. Please note carefully that I am not proposing for Malaysia to have four national languages. Not at all. Let the Malay Language remain our 'Bahasa Kebangsaan' (national language) and every Malaysian must continue learning, speaking and writing in it. And let the other languages of the various ethnic groups making up the population of Malaysia be used on a daily basis without hindrance, as is the position now. For the past 30 years, the structure of that language policy has been somewhat relaxed. It is what public policy should be if a multiracial society like ours is to sustain itself. It is hoped that this attitude will be maintained by the government of the day for as long as possible. Whichever political party in power in the country, let the language policy continue to be liberal. Yesterday, someone drew my attention to a report in The Borneo Post of June 22, 2025. It was about a public-speaking competition organised by the Sibu Chapter of the Federation of Sarawak Chinese Independent Secondary Schools for the students from 14 Chinese independent schools in the state. I salute whoever conceived the idea of a public-speaking competition in three languages: Mandarin, Malay and English. What a great idea! We are on the same page. I hope that one day, there would be a competition of this nature in the future: the use of the Iban language or any of the indigenous languages in Sarawak. The organisers of trilingual competitions, please bear that in mind. First, learn one of the languages. It is high time we actively learn each other's language. I wish someone would start a school or classes in the native languages. The Iban language is already a subject taught in a university in Malaysia, but other indigenous languages are not. Think about possibilities. The importance of a language is not confined to communication between individuals, but it is also crucial to racial understanding and racial harmony. The loss of the language means the loss of the culture of the speakers of that language and, with it, racial identity. Ask the Hawaiians what they feel about losing their language. They used to have their own language, but after English was made the main language of the islands and the lingua franca for daily communication, the use of the indigenous language began to wane. Eventually, generations of Hawaiians did not use their mother tongue on a daily basis and the language slowly died out of lack of regular use. For the past 50 years, some young Hawaiians have been trying to revive interest in the language. I do not know what the status is now. My source, a native Hawaiian introduced to me by Dr Yusuf Hannifah in Honolulu in 1971 and became my regular correspondent for years, had passed away. End of personal communication. The latest I heard about the interest in reviving the Hawaiian language was when I read about a group of musicians from Hawaii who came to perform at the Rainforest World Music Festival in Santubong. In a press release, they meant to showcase, through their performances, their depictions of the traditional culture in their own ancestral knowledge in their language (The Borneo Post – June 22, 2025). The sound of music and the lyric of the song can be an excellent medium of communication. For example, the famous song 'Bekikis Bulu Betis' composed by Penghulu Andrewson Ngalai of Sibu, has been sung by the non-Ibans in every conceivable occasion. It is such an excellent medium for the propagation of the Iban language. Back on the 'kulaiwi' artistes. They highlighted their work as part of 'a larger cultural movement to revive Hawaiian language and tradition'. Note the revival of interest in the Hawaiian language and see the importance of the human tongue for the sustainability of human civilisation. * The opinions expressed in this article are the columnist's own and do not reflect the view of the newspaper. Iban language Melanau native sarawak
