
Ex-Israeli PM Bennett says Netanyahu 'must go', blames him for 'divisions' in Israeli society
JERUSALEM: Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu must leave office, his predecessor Naftali Bennett has told a televised interview, refusing to say whether he intends to challenge the country's longest-serving leader in an election.
In an interview with Israel's Channel 12 that aired on Saturday, former prime minister Bennett said Netanyahu "has been in power for 20 years... that's too much, it's not healthy."
"He bears...heavy responsibility for the divisions in Israeli society", Bennett said of growing rifts within Israel under Netanyahu, who has a strong support base but also staunch opponents who have demanded his departure including over his handling of the Gaza war since October 2023.
Netanyahu "must go", said the former prime minister, a right-wing leader who in 2021 joined forces with Netanyahu critics to form a coalition that ousted him from the premiership after 12 consecutive years at the helm.
But the fragile coalition government Bennett had led along with current opposition chief Yair Lapid collapsed after about a year. Snap elections ensued, and Netanyahu again assumed the premiership with backing from far-right and ultra-Orthodox Jewish parties.
Bennett, who has taken time off from politics, has been rumoured to be planning a comeback, with public opinion polls suggesting he may have enough support to oust Netanyahu again.
No vote is currently planned before late 2026, however, although early elections are common in Israel.
In his Saturday interview, Bennett claimed credit for laying the groundwork for Israel's bombardment campaign earlier this month against Iranian nuclear and military sites.
The decision to launch attacks against the Islamic republic "was very good" and "needed", said Bennett, claiming that the offensive would not have been possible without the work of his short-lived government.
In Gaza, where Israel has waged war since Hamas's October 2023 attack, Bennett said the military has displayed "exceptional" performance but "the political management of the country" was "a catastrophe, a disaster".
Criticising the Netanyahu government's "inability to decide", the former prime minister called for an immediate "comprehensive" agreement that would see all remaining hostages freed from Gaza.
"Leave the task of eliminating Hamas to a future government," said Bennett, who also evaded several questions about whether he intends to run for office.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
Iran Asks UN To Recognise US, Israel As Aggressors In Recent Attacks
Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi on Sunday wrote a letter addressed to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and UNSC President Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett to recognise Israel and the United States as the initiators of the "aggression" against Iran. According to the IANS citing IRNA news agency, Araghchi urged the UNSC to fulfil its responsibility in maintaining international peace and security. He also accused Israel of intentionally striking residential buildings, civilians, and essential infrastructure, calling the attacks a "clear violation" of the UN Charter and a "gross breach" of international law. Araghchi stated that Israel and the United States had also attacked Iran's nuclear facilities — which are under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) — in a "serious breach of the UN Charter, the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the IAEA's regulations and resolutions." The Iranian foreign minister also stressed that the UNSC should hold the "aggressors" accountable and act to prevent the recurrence of such "crimes." Earlier, on June 13, Israel launched major airstrikes on several areas in Iran, including nuclear and military sites, killing senior commanders, nuclear scientists, and numerous civilians. Iran also responded Israel with multiple waves of missile and drone attacks. On June 22, US forces made an entery in support of Israel an bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities. In retaliation, Iran struck the US Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar. After 12 days of fighting, a ceasefire between Iran and Israel was reached on Tuesday. (With IANS inputs)


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Trump Reiterates Iran Nukes Were ‘Obliterated' – Intel Report Says Otherwise; So Who's Lying And Who Leaked The ‘Truth'?
New Delhi: U.S. President Donald Trump called the American bombing of Iran one of the most important military actions in recent memory. He praised the operation for its speed, accuracy and results. The remarks came after a 12-day campaign in which the United States and Israel carried out coordinated strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Talking to Fox News, he described the strikes as a necessary response to what he called 'clear and present threats'. He referred to the campaign as a peacekeeping operation. He also framed it as a decisive message to adversaries across the region. 'This was one of the most skilled and imperative operations of the last 40 years,' Trump said. He stressed that the goal was never to wage endless war, but to prevent one. He credited the US military for executing what he called a textbook operation. Trump said the campaign showed America's ability to act with force and precision when national security is at stake. 'The reign of terror in Iran is coming to a quick end,' he said, repeating a phrase that drew cheers from allies and sharp criticism from Tehran. The president also pointed to the intelligence used in the operation. He praised the targeting strategy and said it disrupted Iran's ability to carry out long-range attacks. 'You can go to bed peacefully tonight. They won't be launching missiles at us,' he said. Though the full extent of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities remains unclear, Trump claimed the operation had 'severely weakened' Tehran's capacity to develop or deliver nuclear weapons. He called the military operation a show of strength that other nations will take seriously. He closed his remarks with a salute to American troops, calling them 'the finest in the world'. The strikes followed weeks of rising tensions between Israel and Iran, with US officials warning of a potential regional escalation. With the ceasefire now in place, Washington has said its objectives were limited and precise. However, contrary to Trump's claim that three of Iran's nuclear sites were gone, obliterated and no longer a threat, a classified intelligence report said otherwise. It suggests damage may not be as complete as he claimed. The report, from the Defense Intelligence Agency, landed quietly but raised serious questions. Early analysis suggests the strikes may have delayed Iran's programme by a few months. No more. The language in the assessment was cautious. 'Low confidence,' it said. A phrase used when information is thin and conclusions are early. Back at the White House, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was pressed on the leaked report. She said only a few people had access. She said there would be a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) into the leak. Someone shared something they should not have, she said. And they would be found. Trump's words painted a picture of total destruction. But the intelligence coming in tells a more complicated story. Pieces are still falling into place. What is clear now is that the strike was strong, but the fallout is still unfolding.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
National Security Conference in Canada calls for stronger action to counter radical forces
A national security conference in Ontario addressed the rising threats of extremism and foreign interference in Canada. Discussions centered on historical events like the Air India bombing, the impact on Indo-Canadian and Jewish communities, and the need for a unified national response. Speakers urged for stronger policies, intelligence sharing, and media responsibility to protect Canadian values and security. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Canada India Foundation (CIF), in collaboration with The Alliance to Fight Secessionism and International KhalistTerrorism (TAFSIK), convened a powerful one-day National Security Conference on Sunday under the theme "United Against Extremism".Held at the Paramount EventSpace in Woodbridge, Ontario, the conference brought together prominent voices from across Canada to deliberate on the growing threats posed by extremist ideologies, foreign interference, and their impact on Canada's domestic conference addressed a harsh and sobering reality: Canada's multicultural democracy is increasingly being manipulated by radical elements that import divisive agendas from overseas. The event featured discussions around historical failures like the 1985 Air India Flight 182 bombing , the rise of foreign-funded extremist groups, and the urgent need for a coordinated national response to counter radicalization, misinformation, and transnational crime."The idea behind this conference is not to single out any individual or community," said Ritesh Malik, founder of Canada India Foundation and chief organiser of the event. "This conference is for Canada to preserve Canada. We came to this country for its peace and values, and we now see extremism threatening those very foundations. Our communities face daily threats. It's time policymakers, security agencies, and elected officials listen and take action."One of the major focal points of the conference was the 1985 Air India bombing--Canada's deadliest act of terrorism that claimed 329 lives, most of them Canadian citizens. Sanjay Lazar, an aviation expert and author who lost his entire family in the tragedy, made an emotional plea."This year marks the 40th anniversary of that bombing," Lazar said. "It wasn't just an attack on a flight; it was a direct assault on Canadian values. We're still waiting for a memorial learning centre and want this story to be integrated into the Canadian education system. We owe that to the victims and future generations."The conference's "Human Cost of Terrorism" session explored how affected communities, particularly Indo-Canadians and Jewish Canadians, continue to suffer the consequences of extremism through hate crimes, threats, and targeted violence."There was a recent attack on a Jewish school--spraying bullets at children. The perpetrators are still at large," one speaker noted. "Is this failure of intelligence or dangerous apathy?"The event also examined modern-day threats ranging from Islamist networks and Khalistani separatists to far-left radicals and foreign intelligence-linked agents operating in Canada under the guise of human rights Bordman, a Canadian journalist, did not mince words: "We are dealing with Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood, ISI-backed Canadians, Khalistanis, and radical far-left elements. It's alarming that these forces continue to operate openly while policy remains paralysed. But I also see the best people here today--and I hope this conference yields action."Wyatt Claypool, another Canadian journalist, echoed the need for a principled foreign policy and stronger national resolve. "Canada has become the country that often backstabs its allies. Whether it's India or Israel, we take the wrong side. We talk like second-year foreign policy students obsessed with de-escalation. We forget that sometimes there is a right and a wrong."He continued, "The Liberals haven't taken this threat seriously. Under Stephen Harper, at least we had a direction. Now, it's chaos."Ujjal Dosanjh, former federal Health Minister and one of the most respected Indo-Canadian political voices, said, "Today's meeting is probably the first in a long time to publicly address extremism in the Indo-Canadian community. Politicians have ignored this issue for far too long. What we see now is an intermingling of extremism, drug smuggling, and immigration fraud--creating serious problems for our society."Community participant Guneet Singh praised the inclusive nature of the event. "This is a Canadian issue, not an Indian issue. Illegal immigration, extremism--these are problems affecting all of us. It's good that platforms like CIF and TAFSIK are stepping up and bringing together people from across social, political, and digital spaces."Panelists also discussed the reluctance of mainstream media and public institutions to address these challenges openly. "Extremists are posting threats online and waving AK-47s, and the RCMP remains silent," a speaker noted. "Hate is disguised as freedom of expression, and security agencies walk on eggshells."One section of the conference focused on Bill 63, legislation which panelists argue curtails freedom of expression for moderate voices, while shielding radical ones from criticism. "Laws like this suppress open dialogue, which is essential to challenge extremism," a speaker conference's objective was not just to diagnose the problems but to push for solutions. Speakers advocated for better intelligence sharing, law enforcement empowerment, and reforms in immigration to weed out exploitation by radical elements. They also called on the media to abandon fear-based self-censorship and speak honestly about growing threats."We must protect the vast majority--the peaceful, gentle citizens of Canada," a panelist urged. "The Canadian Charter of Rights was never meant to shield violence or extremism. It must protect the innocent, not the dangerous."The conference concluded with a commitment to compiling a comprehensive report based on its findings, which will be submitted to Canadian lawmakers and security agencies."The time for silence is over," said Ritesh Malik in closing remarks. "Canada deserves to be what it was, what it should be, and what we want it to be for our children."