If Someone Does These 10 Things, They Might Be a 'Master Manipulator,' Psychologists Warn
Manipulation can cause serious harm to people's mental and emotional (and even physical) well-being. However, some people are so skilled at deceiving others that it's challenging to spot their tactics until it's too late. These people hold the dubious distinction of "master manipulators." While "master manipulation" is not a clinical term, psychologists often know one when they see one (or hear victimized clients talking about one)."A master manipulator is a magician so talented that you forget there's a show," warns Dr. Patricia Dixon, Psy.D., a licensed clinical psychologist. "They're the covert operators of the influence game, employing charm and deceit with equal precision until you start thinking, 'Maybe I'm the one overreacting.' They are the art of making you believe you're the puppeteer when they're secretly pulling the strings."Psychologists share 10 subtle things master manipulators often do, plus ways to cut the strings and reclaim your life.Related:
Master manipulators are proof that first impressions aren't everything."Master manipulators often present as likable and attentive," says Dr. Monique Mendoza, Ph.D., a licensed psychologist. "Manipulators will often initially be described as 'charming,' or make you feel like you're the only one in the room."However, it's all a facade. The goal is to build (and abuse) trust. "They are always quick with a response and always seem to be able to draw people close to them, but you never really feel like you are getting to know them," adds Dr. John Delatorre, Psy.D., M.Jur., a forensic psychologist. "That's the key—they make you feel like some connection is stronger than what is actually real. In order to get what they want, a master manipulator has to have access to people to give things to them."Related:
Despite the faux charm and charisma, master manipulators seem to cry foul constantly."Manipulators position themselves as a victim, often to seek sympathy and support," Dr. Mendoza warns. "You may hear statements like, 'He always has it out for me,' or 'I feel like I can never get ahead.'"
One psychologist reveals that master manipulators weaponize guilt—a form of emotional blackmail."They make you feel...like you owe them something when you know you don't," reports , a psychologist with Thriveworks. "They may say things like: 'If you really cared for me, you would do this,' or 'You're so selfish for not considering my feelings.'"Related:
While psychologists note that gaslighting is often misused these days, master manipulators absolutely employ these tactics. "They try to convince you that the sky is green when it's clearly blue," Dr. Dixon says. "They want to plant seeds of doubt and confusion in your mind, making you question your own observations."
Dr. Vaughan points out that master manipulators lie so much that they can even fool themselves."They have a hard time keeping their stories together," she explains. "They make promises they don't intend to keep. They often change plans at the last minute."Related:
One of the more harmful strategies employed by these individuals is to isolate you from others, with the intention of gaining more control over you and your actions."They often become overly jealous or possessive and try to make you feel bad about yourself with belittling comments, criticisms or humiliation to make you feel inadequate or unworthy," Dr. Vaughan reveals. "They may say things like, 'You're not good enough' [and] 'You're lucky to have me in your life,' for the purpose of wearing down your confidence and making you dependent on them."Related:
You know the idea that it's better to give than receive? Big-time manipulators don't live by it—at all."Master manipulators are only about obtaining, not giving," Dr. Delatorre reports, adding that this behavior applies to emotional connection or physical objects.He says that master manipulators often employ two schemes to achieve their goals."There's the 'door in the face' technique where the manipulator asks for something outrageous, and the person has to say 'no' but then feels guilty for saying no," he explains.Consequently, the person feels obliged to say "yes" to a lesser option—which Dr. Delatorre reveals is exactly what hte manipulator wanted the whole time."There is also the 'foot in the door' technique, where the manipulator asks for things at an increasing level, so $5 becomes $10 becomes $25 and so on until the manipulator has milked the person dry," he says.Related:
Repair and remorse are not in their repertoire. "Even when caught being a manipulator, the person will never say 'sorry,'" Dr. Delatorre warns. "They will never truly apologize for the harm they have committed. It could be that they do not feel remorse."
Perhaps the reason master manipulators don't apologize is that absolutely nothing is ever their fault."They will always place the blame on someone else to keep themselves innocent and in control," Dr. Dixon shares.Related:
Master manipulators have a hard time saying "game over," perhaps because it's become a lifestyle."They cannot stop," Dr. Delatorre explains. "Master manipulators have been living this kind of life for so long it's just second nature. When caught, they will just come up with another lie to make it seem like what the person sees is not real."Related:
Consider boundaries a guardrail to protect your emotional well-being. It won't be easy to enforce them because master manipulators have serious issues respecting boundaries."Master manipulators often exploit a lack of boundaries to control and influence others," Dr. Vaughan says. "You need to define what is acceptable and unacceptable behavior and communicate assertively. Be prepared to walk away when and if they do consistently ignore your boundaries."Related:
Master manipulators can weaponize anything and thrive on triggering emotional reactions and gathering information about you that they can use to increase their control."By limiting engagement and information given, it minimizes their influence over you," Dr. Vaughan explains. "Practice assertiveness by utilizing 'I' statements to express emotions and needs without accusing. Keep information factual and to the point."Related:
All the gaslighting can leave you in a constant state of doubt. However, Dr. Mendoza advises people to check in with their minds and guts. If you need help reflecting, she suggests asking yourself:
Do I feel drained after our interactions?
Do their stories glaze over details to make them look good?
Do I worry about what will happen if I say "no" to their requests?
"These questions can help you check how this person has been impacting your thinking and decision-making process," she says.Related: ts
Realizing you've been taken for a ride can send you on a shame spiral. Remember, it's not your fault."Many of their tactics are fully seen for what they are until you stop engaging with them," Dr. Mendoza points out. "Seek support from trusted family, friends or professionals to rebuild your trust in relationships."
Up Next:Dr. Patricia Dixon, Psy.D., licensed clinical psychologist
Dr. Monique Mendoza, Ph.D., licensed psychologist
Dr. John Delatorre, Psy.D., M.Jur., forensic psychologist
Dr. Denitrea Vaughan, Psy.D., LPC-S, psychologist with Thriveworks
If Someone Does These 10 Things, They Might Be a 'Master Manipulator,' Psychologists Warn first appeared on Parade on Jul 8, 2025
This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 8, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Data breach at Allianz Life Insurance affects 1.4 million customers
Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America has announced a significant data breach impacting the personal information of a large portion of its 1.4 million customers. The Minneapolis-based company, a subsidiary of Allianz SE based in Munich, reported that the breach occurred on 16 July via a third-party cloud service. In a statement, Allianz Life indicated that a 'malicious threat actor' gained access to the external platform through social engineering, a method whereby attackers deceive individuals into revealing sensitive information or access credentials. 'The threat actor was able to obtain personally identifiable data related to the majority of Allianz Life's customers, financial professionals and select Allianz Life employees,' the statement noted. While the specifics of the compromised data have not been detailed, such breaches typically involve personal details such as names, contact information, social security numbers and financial data. Notably, Allianz Life clarified that its internal systems were not affected. 'This incident was limited to a third-party cloud platform. Our systems remain secure,' a spokesperson for the company stated. In response to the incident, Allianz Life reported that it took immediate measures to contain the breach and has informed the FBI. The incident has also been reported to various authorities including the Office of the Maine Attorney General, as companies are mandated to disclose data breaches that impact residents of the state. According to a filing with the Maine Attorney General's office, Allianz became aware of the breach the day after it occurred and is providing affected individuals with 24 months of complementary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services. The breach is limited to Allianz Life's operations in the US and does not extend to other Allianz corporate entities worldwide. The company has informed the FBI about the incident and indicated that its ongoing investigation has found no evidence that its internal network or other systems including the policy administration system were compromised. In May this year, Allianz reported a net income of €2.42bn ($2.82bn) for the first quarter of 2025 (Q1 2025), a 2.1% decrease from €2.47bn in Q1 2024. However, the German insurer's operating profit increased by 6.3% to €4.2bn, up from €3.9bn the previous year. The property-casualty segment contributed €2.1bn with a 5% rise in operating profit, while the life/health segment saw a 7.5% increase to €1.4bn. "Data breach at Allianz Life Insurance affects 1.4 million customers" was originally created and published by Life Insurance International, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.


Associated Press
13 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Connecticut firefighter killed in accident while fighting a house fire
PLAINVILLE, Conn. (AP) — A Connecticut firefighter was killed after a piece of a fire truck broke free and struck him, state police said. Raymond Moreau, 60, a 35-year veteran of the Plainville Fire Department, suffered severe leg injuries on Sunday while at the scene of a house on fire. He later died during surgery at a hospital, authorities said. He was standing outside the house near the truck when a piece of the vehicle broke off and struck him, state police said. No other details were released. 'Ray was a loving husband and veteran of the United State Marine Corp.,' state police and Plainville officials said in a statement. 'Firefighter Moreau was a consummate professional, dedicated servant, and will be missed dearly by his friends, family, and community.' Officials said Moreau started with the fire department in July 1990 and volunteered tens of thousands of hours in the community. A public ceremony is planned for Tuesday at the Plainville High School stadium. Gov. Ned Lamont ordered all U.S. and state flags in Connecticut to be flown at half-staff until Moreau's burial. 'Today's tragedy is another reminder about the extraordinary risk that firefighters face as part of their duties, and they are heroes for assuming these responsibilities,' Lamont said in a statement. State police said they were investigating the accident in collaboration with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the local prosecutor's office. Firefighters responded to the house fire shortly before 6:30 a.m. Sunday. The house was destroyed, but all the residents made it out safely. Area residents and firefighters placed flowers, flags and wreaths outside the Plainville Fire Department in honor of Moreau.


The Verge
13 minutes ago
- The Verge
How Trump let Boeing off the hook for the 737 MAX crashes
On July 18th, a federal judge in Texas scheduled what will likely be the final hearing in the case of United States v. The Boeing Company. After five years of litigation, the end result can only be described as a victory for Boeing — and a permanent setback for those who hoped that the company would be held accountable for a decade of safety violations. Last year, Boeing's prospects looked far bleaker. In 2021, the Department of Justice charged the company with conspiracy to defraud the government about the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) software on the 737 MAX, which has been linked to the deaths of 346 people in the crashes of Lion Air 610 and Ethiopian Airlines 302. (The Verge first covered this story in 2019.) After years of legal maneuvering, the company agreed to plead guilty to the conspiracy charge in July 2024 in order to avoid a criminal trial. Under the plea bargain's terms, Boeing would pay nearly $2.5 billion to airlines, families of crash victims, and the government, plus accept three years of monitoring from an independent safety consultant. That agreement was thrown out by a federal judge in December, and a trial date was set for June 2025. If convicted, Boeing would not be able to simply pay its way out of trouble. As a corporate felon, the company would have to permanently accept increased government scrutiny over every part of its business — a return to a regulatory model that Congress repealed in 2005, after significant lobbying by the aviation and defense industries. According to one legal think tank, United States v. Boeing had the potential to be one of the most significant corporate compliance judgments in decades. But then Donald Trump returned to the White House. Many of Trump's strongest political allies have benefited from significant changes in policy under the new administration: the crypto industry, industrial polluters, and Elon Musk, to name a few. Boeing has spent a considerable amount of money building a relationship with Trump, too. It donated $1 million to his inauguration fund, and its CEO accompanied Trump on his recent trip to Qatar. Its payout came last May, when the head of the DOJ's Criminal Division, Matthew Galeotti, announced a change of enforcement strategy. Galeotti directed his division to no longer pursue 'overboard and unchecked corporate and white-collar enforcement [that] burdens U.S. businesses and harms U.S. interests.' Instead, he wanted it to focus on a narrower set of crimes, including terrorism, tariff-dodging, drug trafficking, and 'Chinese Money Laundering Organizations.' 'Not all corporate misconduct warrants federal criminal prosecution,' the memo stated. 'It is critical to American prosperity to acknowledge …companies that are willing to learn from their mistakes.' Boeing has spent a considerable amount of money building a relationship with Trump. Two weeks later, the DOJ agreed to drop the charges against Boeing completely. Instead of pleading guilty, Boeing would now just be liable for a reduced monetary penalty of around $1.2 billion: $235 million in new fines, plus $445 million into a fund for the families of the 737 MAX crash victims. It would also have to invest $455 million to enhance its 'compliance and safety programs,' part of which would pay for an 'independent compliance consultant' for two years of oversight. It avoided a felony charge, and more importantly, it was allowed to continue self-auditing its own products. The DOJ's rationale for the change was that it expects companies to be 'willing to learn from [their] mistakes.' This is not a skill that Boeing seems to possess. The company makes plenty of mistakes. Its 737 MAX has been plagued by computer errors that go far beyond MCAS. Its strategy of outsourcing production to third-party suppliers has been a consistent source of manufacturing errors and delays for almost a decade. Its lack of investment in quality control in its factories have caused new airplanes to be delivered with a variety of severe defects: excessive gaps in airplane fuselages, metal debris near critical wiring bundles or inside fuel tanks, and door plugs installed without security bolts. The latter issue led to the explosive decompression of Alaska Airlines 1282 in January 2024, an incident that went viral thanks to the dramatic passenger video taken from inside the cabin. But Boeing does not seem to be able to learn from its mistakes. According to the DOJ, Boeing has known all of this and has still 'fail[ed] to design, implement, and enforce a compliance and ethics program.' Although the company has brought on two new CEOs in the last six years, each of whom promised to clean things up, Boeing's core culture still remains — which is the root cause of all of its technical problems. The DOJ's rationale for the change was that it expects companies to be 'willing to learn from [their] mistakes.' This is not a skill that Boeing seems to possess. As I wrote in my book about the 737 MAX crashes, Boeing is so large and so firmly entrenched as one of the world's two major commercial airplane makers that it is functionally immune from the market's invisible hand. It is so strategically and economically important that it will always get bailed out, even in the face of a global crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. And it makes so much money every year that even the multibillion-dollar fines that the DOJ is willing to impose amount to just a small portion of its annual revenues. 'Boeing became too big to fail,' former FTC chair Lina Khan said in a 2024 speech. 'Worse quality is one of the harms that most economists expect from monopolization, because firms that face little competition have limited incentive to improve their products.' If regulators won't step in and force Boeing to change, then it will continue to prioritize profits over safety — the only rational choice in a consequence-free environment. This might be a good bargain for its shareholders, but not for passengers. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Darryl Campbell Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Aviation Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Boeing Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Transportation