
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max may house biggest ever battery in an iPhone: Report
may unveil the
iPhone 17 series
in September this year. According to rumours, the company may replace the 'Plus' variant with a 'Slim' model with the 2025 iPhone lineup. While there is no official confirmation, the slim model may likely be called the
iPhone Air
. If true, the iPhone 17 series may consist of four models – iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Air. As the launch gets closer, rumours around the upcoming iPhones have increased. As per the latest one, the
iPhone 17 Pro Max
may house the biggest ever battery in an iPhone. Leakster Instant Digital on Weibo shared a post where it listed the battery capacities of the iPhone 11 Pro Max through to the iPhone 16 Pro Max, adding that the iPhone 17 Pro Max will feature a battery capacity of 5,000mAh. Here's the battery capacities as listed by the tipster
iPhone 11 Pro Max: 3,969mAh
iPhone 12 Pro Max: 3,687mAh
iPhone 13 Pro Max: 4,352mAh
iPhone 14 Pro Max: 4,323mAh
iPhone 15 Pro Max: 4,422mAh
iPhone 16 Pro Max: 4,676mAh
iPhone 17 Pro Max: ~5,000mAh
According to 9to5Mac, 'Depending on how close to 5,000 the final number ends up being, we could be looking at almost a 10% increase in capacity. It's important to note, however, that a battery's capacity doesn't have a 1:1 correlation with battery life improvements,' it says.
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max features (expected)
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Providers are furious: Internet access without a subscription!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
The iPhone 17 Pro Max is likely to come powered by the
A19 Pro chipset
. It will run on the
iOS 26
that was revealed at WWDC on June 9. The new operating system brings the
Liquid Glass interface
to iPhones. The display is expected to retain its 6.9-inch, while the camera may see another yearly upgrade for the iPhone 17 Pro Max.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Xiaomi Founder's Bold EV Bet Is Paying Off Where Apple's Failed
(Bloomberg) -- Lei Jun, founder and chairman of Xiaomi Corp., the only tech company to have successfully diversified into carmaking, couldn't resist. Speaking at a triumphant launch event in Beijing late last month for Xiaomi's second electric vehicle, a long-anticipated SUV, Lei pointedly mentioned Apple Inc., which spent a decade and $10 billion trying to make a car before giving up last year. 'Since Apple stopped developing its car, we've given special care to Apple users,' he said, noting that owners of the American giant's iPhones would be able to seamlessly sync their devices to Xiaomi's vehicles. The not-so-subtle dig was followed by a flex: Xiaomi then said it had received more than 289,000 orders for its new sport utility vehicle within an hour of its announcement, more than its first EV, a sedan launched in March 2024. Xiaomi succeeding where Apple failed has burnished Lei's reputation, made his company one of the most valuable in China and shaken up both the tech and automobile industries. The collapse of Apple's moonshot car program has only underscored the effectiveness of Xiaomi's grounded approach, which took inspiration from proven designs from Tesla Inc. and Porsche Automobil Holding SE while staying true to the affordable ethos that's made it a cult brand for Gen Z consumers. Crucially, it also launched into the most fertile EV ecosystem in the world — China. With state subsidies, existing charging infrastructure and a ready made supply chain, Xiaomi had a structural tailwind Apple lacked. Xiaomi declined to comment for this story. Lei and Xiaomi's 'charisma, brand recognition and ecosystem cannot be underestimated,' Yale Zhang, the managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight, said. 'It's a big influence on young consumers who have filled their homes with Xiaomi products. When it comes time to buy an EV, they naturally think of Xiaomi.' But building cars is a far more complex, capital intensive challenge than making phones or rice cookers. It requires mastering safety regulations, global logistics and production at scale, all while competing against legacy automakers with long histories and large model lineups. Any international expansion will also require navigating complex geopolitical landscapes. As one of the first tech giants to actually manufacture a car, Xiaomi is in uncharted territory. Apple's car project, internally dubbed Project Titan, failed in large part because it wasn't just an EV — it was at one point an attempt to leapfrog the auto industry with a fully autonomous, Level 5 self-driving machine. Its goals were lofty and the direction constantly shifting, the result being over a decade of effort with nothing to show. Lei, 55, was comparatively stingy with time and resources and staked his personal reputation on the endeavor, claiming that making cars would be his 'last entrepreneurial project.' Xiaomi's public narrative is that Lei and his team learned by visiting multiple Chinese automakers, including Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co. and Great Wall Motor Co., and talked to more than 200 industry experts in some 80 meetings. The reality is also that he used Xiaomi's reputation as an innovative consumer behemoth to get close to China's large carmakers and pick off their top talent. Geely and its billionaire founder Li Shufu welcomed Lei to the automaker's research institute in Ningbo in the months leading up to Xiaomi's announcement that it would enter the car business to discuss topics, including potential collaboration. It's Geely lore that Lei added the WeChat contacts of many staff at the institute, including then-director Hu Zhengnan. Hu later joined Shunwei Capital Partners, the investment firm co-founded by Lei. Xiaomi headhunters also courted Geely staff intensely, according to people familiar with the matter. While it's common for talent to move between companies in the same industry, it was unusual to see this level of aggressiveness around recruitment, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing information that's private. Geely didn't respond to a request for comment. Hu, known for his love of the German luxury marque Porsche, was one of the team members credited as being instrumental to developing Xiaomi's EV business, Lei said at the SU7 launch in 2024. Lei added that Hu left his previous employer after his contract ended. Other executives who joined Xiaomi came from companies including BAIC Motor Corp., BMW AG, SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co. — the General Motors Co. joint venture with SAIC Motor Corp. and Wuling Motors Holdings Ltd. — and auto supplier Magna Steyr LLC. Besides assembling top Chinese automaking talent, Lei made a prescient bet on investing in a self-controlled supply chain — insulating Xiaomi's operation from manufacturing vagaries. This came from painful lessons learned in Xiaomi's early smartphone-producing days, when external suppliers would cut off components unpredictably. In 2016, some members of Xiaomi's supply chain team displeased Samsung Electronics Co. representatives and the South Korean firm threatened to halt supply of its industry-leading AMOLED screens. To mend the fractured relationship, Lei flew to Shenzhen to meet with Samsung's China head at the time. The pair drank five bottles of red wine during their dinner meeting, according to a Xiaomi company biography, and Lei also made multiple trips to Samsung's headquarters in South Korea to apologize and negotiate the resumption of supply. Representatives from Samsung declined to comment. After Xiaomi went into the carmaking business, it invested into almost all parts of the EV supply chain, from batteries and chips to air suspension and sensors. It pumped more than $1.6 billion via Shunwei or other Xiaomi-led funds into over 100 supply chain companies between 2021 and 2024, according to data compiled by Chinese analytics firm Zhangtongshe and Bloomberg. The components from some of the companies that Xiaomi invested in have ended up in its cars, such as lidars from Hesai Technology Co. and onboard chargers and voltage converters from Zhejiang EV-Tech Co. With the 10 billion yuan ($1.4 billion) it committed to the first phase of its EV venture, Xiaomi also built its own factory, rather than going down the contract manufacturing route that some Chinese makers, including Nio Inc. and Xpeng Inc., did when they started out. 'Among tech companies that now build electric vehicles, those who previously had hardware products seem to be more successful than those who only had software products or information services,' said Paul Gong, UBS Group AG's head of China autos research. Despite its early success, there are many who argue Xiaomi's one hit car is copied from elsewhere — and that a sole successful vehicle does not a successful auto producer make. Lei's aggressive approach has also raised hackles in China's car industry. Yu Jingmin, vice president of SAIC's passenger car division, reportedly described Xiaomi's approach as 'shameless' in a critique of the SU7 resembling Porsche. The SU7 has been colloquially dubbed 'Porsche Mi' by netizens. SAIC didn't respond to questions about Yu's remarks. Xiaomi's design team, led by former BMW designer Li Tianyuan, has defended the SU7's aesthetics, emphasizing that the choices were driven by aerodynamic efficiency and performance benchmarks. In late March, there was another setback after a fatal accident involving the SU7. The car had its advanced driver assistance technology turned on before the crash, which afterward led to authorities reining in the promotion and deployment of the technology. The usually vocal Lei kept a low profile on social media for more than a month post the March accident. He returned to more active engagement in May with a missive that said this period of time was the most difficult in his career. Fortunately for Xiaomi, its consumer base is sticky. Known as 'Mi Fans,' the loyal customers have played a pivotal role in the company's rise. Xiaomi cultivated this fandom early on by prioritizing user feedback and the grassroots allegiance has helped it build strong brand equity, especially in China. The SU7 has remained a top selling model even after the accident in March. Indeed, dealers have reported that nearly 50% of customers plump for the SU7 without comparing it to other brands. 'A significant number of older consumers are buying the SU7 for their children, indicating that the model has built trust among more conservative buyers thanks to its safety and quality,' said Rosalie Chen, a senior analyst from investment research firm Third Bridge. Xiaomi has set a delivery target of 350,000 units in 2025, up from its previous goal of 300,000, buoyed by demand for the newly launched YU7 and a ramp up in production. The starting prices for the SU7 sedan, at 215,900 yuan ($30,100), and its SUV, at 253,500 yuan, make them competitive alternatives to models like Tesla's Model 3 and Model Y. The EVs are also showing financial promise. Xiaomi posted record revenue for the first quarter this year, driven by car and smartphone sales. Its EV division is expected to turn profitable in the second half of 2025, Lei said in an investor meeting in June. But even if the popularity of Xiaomi's EVs can spring beyond the company's devoted base, production is still on a much more boutique scale. China's top car brand, BYD Co., sold around 4.3 million EVs and hybrids last year, many overseas, while Tesla moved about 1.78 million vehicles globally. Toyota Motor Corp., the world's No. 1 automaker, sold some 10.8 million vehicles and boasts a lineup of approximately 70 different models. Lei doesn't seem to be prioritizing the mass market of below $20,000 yet, which drives significant volume and is where BYD dominates, Automotive Foresight's Zhang said. Without a lineup in that segment, Xiaomi cars will remain niche purchases for middle to higher-income consumers and Xiaomi may face the same risks as Tesla, which is seeing its sales slump exacerbated by a narrow consumer base and limited models. Nonetheless, Lei seems buoyed by Xiaomi's early wins and is now looking at global expansion. Xiaomi will consider selling cars outside China from 2027, he said last week. Success or otherwise, the European Union, the US and Turkey have all slapped tariffs on Chinese EVs, but Xiaomi wants to set up a R&D center in Munich and may test sales starting in European markets such as Germany, Spain and France when the time is right, Chinese media 36Kr reported in April. 'Xiaomi is a latecomer to the auto industry,' Lei admitted on Weibo in June. But, he said, in a market driven by technology and innovation and the rising global influence of China's EV culture, 'there are always opportunities for latecomers.' --With assistance from Vlad Savov, Mark Gurman, Drake Bennett and Jessica Sui. More stories like this are available on


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Infosys shifts from virtual-only to hybrid hiring
Bengaluru: Infosys has transitioned from a virtual-only mode to a hybrid model of virtual and in-person recruitment. This change likely stems from virtual hires during the pandemic falling short of the necessary requirements. Earlier this year, Infosys terminated 600 employees from its Mysuru campus after freshers failed to clear an internal assessment. During the 2024-25 financial year, Infosys received 44.4 lakh employment applications, interviewed 4.3 lakh applicants, and extended offers of employment to 83,207 applicants. In 2022, Infosys transitioned into a hybrid model of work for its employees and service providers following an extended period of remote work due to the pandemic and continued with the same. In fact, in a recent SEC filing, Infosys stated that the effectiveness of its candidate assessment in a virtual hiring process may be compromised by several challenges. These include the possibility of fake profiles, limited opportunities to build personal rapport, and potential technical issues such as connectivity problems. Infosys also highlighted that continued remote working arrangements expose the firm to the risk of employees engaging in dual employment or moonlighting without obtaining the necessary approvals. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Infosys said that this practice may lead to potential conflicts of interest, breaches of confidentiality, and diminished productivity. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru For the first time, Infosys called out GCCs in a recent US regulatory filing. Vendor consolidation and global capability centres (GCCs) are being driven by Infosys' data and AI estate management offering. "The goal is not only to consolidate vendors to reduce services spending but also to create a self-funding model to optimise, manage, and transform the data and AI landscape of an enterprise. The self-funding model is driven by committing TCO reduction through AI-fuelled hyper productivity, new services model – vertical consolidation and right shoring," the filing said. Infosys mentioned that some clients are choosing to strengthen their in-house IT capabilities and gain greater control over their technology investments by establishing or expanding their own GCCs in India or other regions such as Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Southeast Asia. "While we witness a strong deal momentum, we have also enhanced our capabilities in the GCC scope across consult, sell, build, and deliver functions." Infosys is expanding its capabilities with a full-fledged GCC practice and has appointed Deval Shah, the former MD and country head of India for Danske IT and Support Services India, as its new GCC leader. Shah is the VP and delivery head at Infosys.


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Few And Far Between: Nagpur Has Just One Charging Station For Every 515 EVs
Nagpur: Despite aggressive promotion of electric vehicles (EVs) under green energy initiatives, Nagpur district continues to grapple with a critical shortage of charging infrastructure. According to official data, there is just one EV charging station for every 515 electric vehicles in the district. The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (MSEDCL), which is the sole authority for providing power connections to EV charging points, revealed that 151 charging stations have been set up so far across the district and many of them are private and not available to public. Of these, 58 are in urban areas, while 93 lie within the broader city limits. Among the total stations, 43 have been installed by various fuel providers, while MSEDCL itself installed six. "The charging stations installed by MSEDCL and fuel providers are all available to the public. Many of the remaining ones are also being used by the public, but they are installed by private people, MahaMetro, Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC), and others," said a senior MSEDCL official. The officer further said although the pace of installation increased recently, many stations remain privately owned and are not accessible to the public, thereby limiting the usability of the city's overall EV infrastructure. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo At present, there are 77,795 registered electric vehicles in the city, spanning all categories, including battery-operated vehicles (BOVs), pure EVs, and strong hybrids. However, with only 151 charging stations available, public access to charging infrastructure remains severely restricted. According to RTO-wise data, 46,686 EVs are registered at Nagpur East RTO (MH49), followed by 15,805 in Nagpur Rural RTO (MH40), and 15,304 in Nagpur Urban RTO (MH31). This imbalance has created challenges for EV users, who often struggle to locate reliable charging options — particularly during peak usage hours or long distance travel. Experts warn that this growing gap between vehicle adoption and infrastructure support could jeopardise the broader goals of sustainable mobility and frustrate EV owners. One such user, Vaibhav Sahare, shared his experience. "In our apartment, there were four or five e-cars, so we went ahead and installed a charging station, but if someday we need to charge a vehicle outside, then we either have to wait for a long time or it gets harder to find a charging station. In other countries, charging stations are installed at short distances. Such steps should be initiated in our country as well. It will not only promote green energy but also provide us with facilities," said Sahare. While the city has seen a steady increase in the number of charging points, officials and users agree that the current infrastructure remains inadequate. Unless this gap is urgently addressed, Nagpur's ambition of becoming a green and sustainable city may face serious hurdles.