Telangana cabinet to finalise reply to Ghose panel on KLIS and other key issues
The commission, currently investigating the sinking of piers at Medigadda and the damage to the Annaram and Sundilla barrages under KLIS, has cross-examined former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao and former ministers T Harish Rao and Eatala Rajender. Following their depositions, the commission is understood to have written to the govt seeking further details.
KCR
, Harish Rao, and Eatala reportedly informed the commission that the project was undertaken with cabinet approval.
However, Agriculture minister Tummala Nageswara Rao, who served during the first term of the previous BRS govt, claimed that many decisions were made solely by KCR.
"The chief minister's office has responded to the Ghose Commission stating that the requested information will be submitted by June 30. The matter will be discussed at the cabinet meeting on June 23," sources in the CMO said.
Chief minister A Revanth Reddy has already stated that the cabinet will also consider the advantages and disadvantages of initiating discussions with Andhra Pradesh CM N Chandrababu Naidu to find an amicable resolution to the inter-state river water sharing issue, including the contentious Banakacharla project, between the two Telugu-speaking states.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
"The chief minister and ministers are also expected to discuss the panchayat elections, the law department's report regarding the submission of material to the court on fixing reservations in local bodies, implementation of the Rythu Bharosa scheme, the Indiramma housing scheme, and other key issues," sources added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
The Big Beautiful Bill's quiet revolution: Dismantling the federal role in education
While President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' has drawn noisy debate over taxes and immigration, its most transformative, and potentially divisive, legacy may unfold far from the public gaze: Inside America's classrooms. Formally known as the American Prosperity and Freedom Act, the bill runs 940 pages deep. Nestled in its dense legal language is a radical reimagination of how education is funded, who controls it, and what it's meant to teach. More than a fiscal realignment, the bill signals a cultural and institutional recalibration, a blueprint not just for cutting costs, but for shrinking the federal government's role in shaping educational equity and intellectual freedom. Defunding the foundation At the heart of the legislation lies a nearly 20% cut to discretionary funding for the US Department of Education over five years. This is no administrative trimming. Critical lifelines such as Title I grants, designed to level the playing field for students in low-income districts, and IDEA funds supporting students with disabilities face sharp reductions. In real terms, that means fewer teachers, larger class sizes, shuttered after-school programmes, and thinner support for special education. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hörspezialisten toben: Dieses 89 €-Gerät geht viral Top Trending News Today Mehr erfahren Undo For under-resourced schools already walking a fiscal tightrope, this isn't reform. It's a retreat. And for districts that rely heavily on federal aid to supplement inadequate state budgets, the message is clear: you're on your own. Choice or abandonment? The bill also elevates a longstanding conservative goal, school choice, by creating a federal tax credit scholarship programme. Under the guise of parental empowerment, the initiative incentivizes donations to private school tuition, effectively subsidizing elite alternatives while siphoning funds from the public system. To supporters, this is freedom in action, a mechanism to spark competition and elevate standards. But critics see something far more corrosive: A public school exodus that accelerates segregation, weakens accountability, and hollows out the very system meant to serve all students. If left unchecked, it could reshape education into a two-tiered model, one privately buoyed and publicly neglected. The return of debt-driven futures Perhaps no provision has sparked more alarm among recent graduates than the rollback of Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and the rollback of income-driven repayment schemes. In their place: Increased reliance on private lenders and corporate partnerships to manage student loans. This pivot represents not just a policy shift but a moral disinvestment in those who choose public service, teachers, social workers, and rural doctors. With no promise of debt relief, many will opt out before they even begin. The future will be more indebted, more risk-averse, and less willing to serve. A curriculum draped in red, white, and blue Education, under Trump's bill, isn't just an economic tool; it's a cultural battlefield. Echoing the rhetoric of the 1776 Commission, the bill allocates $500 million toward 'American Values Curriculum Grants,' with an explicit directive: teach US history through a lens of national pride and exceptionalism. What does that mean in practice? A potential erasure of systemic critique, reduced engagement with marginalized histories, and teacher training programs aligned with ideological litmus tests. Supporters hail it as a corrective to 'anti-American bias.' Detractors warn it edges dangerously close to state-sponsored historical revisionism, where patriotism comes at the cost of intellectual honesty. Knowledge under siege The bill's impact on higher education is equally profound. While STEM fields tied to defence and industry are protected, social sciences and environmental research face a 12% funding cut. This selective pruning risks reorienting universities around military-industrial priorities, undermining the pursuit of knowledge that challenges, questions, and enriches democratic society. PhD programs in climate change, sociology, or public health, already vulnerable, may contract or vanish entirely. The academy's capacity to interrogate power, inequality, or the planet's fragility is quietly being starved. Federal hands off, private hands in Across its many chapters, the Big Beautiful Bill weaves a consistent theme: Less federal protection, more market intervention. Public institutions are pushed toward privatized models. Equity-based funding is exchanged for performance-based incentives. Ideological coherence replaces pedagogical complexity. This isn't merely conservative tinkering. It's the architectural undoing of federal involvement in public education, with consequences that will play out over decades, not news cycles. The fight ahead Already, civil rights organizations are preparing lawsuits to challenge the legality of voucher programmes that may breach public education mandates. States reliant on Title I and IDEA funds are lobbying for carve-outs and concessions. But the scaffolding has shifted. What was once a federal promise, that no child's future would be determined by their ZIP code or income bracket, is now being recast as a local gamble and a parental responsibility. Education reimagined, but for whom? Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' may never draw the fiery protests of immigration bans or the coverage of Supreme Court appointments. But it represents something arguably more enduring: A generational redesign of the American education system, not by consensus, but by calculation. What we're witnessing is not just defunding or deregulating, but a deliberate redefinition of what education is for, who it belongs to, and whose history it must teach. For all its patriotism, the bill risks betraying the most essential American promise, that education, in a democracy, is not a privilege. It is a right. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Sanatan Mahakumbh a call for cultural unity'
Buxar: Former Union minister and senior BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Choubey visited Buxar on Thursday as part of a Janjagran Abhiyan to promote the upcoming Sanatan Mahakumbh, scheduled for July 6 at Gandhi Maidan in Patna. Addressing a press conference, Choubey said the event was more than a religious gathering. "The Mahakumbh is a socio-cultural Mahayagna for national awakening. It aims to revive Sanatan values, promote social harmony and reinforce India's cultural unity," he said. "If Sanatan exists, the nation exists and so do political parties. All Hindus and Muslims in this country are Sanatanis," he added. Choubey confirmed that the event would see participation from Shankaracharyas, Mahamandaleshwars, religious leaders and cultural organisations nationwide. Jagadguru Ramanandacharya Swami Shri Rambhadracharya Ji Maharaj and the heads of major Akhadas and Vedic institutions are also expected to attend. A key highlight will be an ideological seminar on the theme 'Waiting for Lord Parashuram'. "The theme represents an awakened social consciousness, one that stands against injustice, upholds equality and furthers nation-building through Sanatan culture," Choubey said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo He urged people from Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan to attend and bring conches (shankhs) from home. "When thousands of conches are blown together at Gandhi Maidan, it will be a sight to behold," he said. Reiterating an earlier demand, Choubey called for a grand statue of Lord Ram to be installed in Buxar, his Karmabhoomi. He also revealed that renovations of the long-neglected Light and Sound House near Ramrekha Ghat are nearing completion. With Rs 6 crore sanctioned by the ministry of tourism, the site will soon feature a laser and light show based on epics like the Ramayana.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ukraine kills Putin's pick — top Russian Navy commander dead just days after surprise promotion
Just over three months after being handpicked by Russian president Vladimir Putin for a prestigious role in Moscow's military leadership, Major General Mikhail Gudkov is now dead, as he was killed in action near Ukraine's northeastern border in what appears to be a Ukrainian strike, as per a report. Vladimir Putin's Deputy Commander-in-Chief Killed Near Ukrainian Border The 42-year-old, who was serving as the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy , died in the Kursk region on July 2 during a reported combat mission close to the Sumy border, according to Russia's Ministry of Defence and Oleg Kozhemyako, Governor of Russia's Primorye Territory, as reported by Newsweek. His death, initially reported by Ukrainian media and pro-Russian military bloggers as the result of a HIMARS strike , has now been officially confirmed by Moscow, according to the report. ALSO READ: Jeff Bezos–Lauren Sánchez wedding generates $222 million hype, was a goldmine for Dolce & Gabbana Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Chevy's New SUV Is Here – Look vividtrendlab Undo A Rapid Rise and a Sudden End Gudkov had only recently been promoted by Putin to his new role on March 28, 2025, the Institute for the Study of War think tank had pointed out at the time, as per the Newsweek report. He was previously the commander of the 155th Separate Guards Brigade of the Pacific Fleet Naval Infantry, as reported by Newsweek. The defense ministry shared the news on its Telegram channel about Gudkov's death, saying, "Eternal memory to the hero," as quoted in the report. Live Events Missile Barrages and Blame Games Between Russia and Ukraine According to the Newsweek report, it is a big step for Ukrainian forces, as they are under intense pressure from Russian advances in the east and the looming threat of a summer offensive, with 50,000 of Moscow's troops gathered near the Sumy border. This comes after Russia had attacked Ukrainian cities with missiles and drones, which led to dozens of casualties, as per the report. While, Moscow has also accused Ukraine of hitting residential areas, which has led to many deaths and injuries, according to Newsweek. ALSO READ: Diogo Jota net worth: This is how much the Liverpool and Portuguese football star was earning before his death Donald Trump Halts Aid, But Hints at More Missiles However, Ukraine also suffered a major blow recently when the Trump administration removed a planned shipment of weapons following a Pentagon review, as they said that the United States needed to replenish its own stockpiles instead, as reported by Newsweek. While, the US president Donald Trump had also previously said that he was considering sending more Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine to support them in defending against Russian strikes, according to the report. FAQs Who was Mikhail Gudkov? He was the Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy and a trusted military figure promoted by Putin in March 2025, as per the Newsweek report. What has Russia said about his death? Russia's Ministry of Defence honored him on Telegram, calling him a hero and mourning his loss,as per the Newsweek report.
