Nagpur Powers Up India's First AI-Driven Anganwadi
2
Nagpur: In a landmark move to revolutionise early childhood education, India's first Artificial Intelligence (AI)-powered Anganwadi was inaugurated in Nagpur district under the ambitious initiative Mission Bal Bharari.
Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis launched the pioneering project at Metro Bhavan, with several top dignitaries including Union minister Nitin Gadkari, state BJP president and guardian minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule, and zilla parishad CEO Vinayak Mahamuni in attendance.
The pilot Anganwadi, set up at Waddhamna in Hingna taluka, boasts cutting-edge technology such as Virtual Reality (VR) headsets, AI-integrated smart dashboards, and interactive digital learning content.
"These facilities — rare even in premium private kindergartens — will be used to teach poems, songs, and curriculum in a highly engaging and innovative manner," said a senior official.
What makes this initiative particularly impactful is its aim to bridge the educational divide between rural and urban areas. "This is an emotional resolution to ensure every child learns with joy, curiosity, and confidence," said Mahamuni, adding that the goal is to bring a historic transformation in Maharashtra's early childhood education system.
As part of the mission, Anganwadi workers were trained to operate the advanced smart tools. The zilla parishad plans to expand this model by launching 40 more AI-powered Anganwadis across Nagpur district.
"Through Mission Bal Bharari, we are committed to giving kids from rural backgrounds same trust, exposure, and facilities that children in metropolitan cities receive at home or in private kindergartens," the CM said.
The launch event saw the presence of key political leaders including minister of state for agriculture Ashish Jaiswal, MLAs Krishna Khopde, Pravin Datke, and Sanjay Meshram, along with divisional commissioner Vijayalakshmi Bidari and district collector Vipin Itankar.
With Nagpur Zilla Parishad at the helm, this initiative also symbolises a visionary step toward inclusive and future-ready education.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
5 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Kerala urges Supreme Court to dismiss president's reference about timelines for bills assent
The Kerala government on Monday urged the Supreme Court to return unanswered the presidential reference that seeks clarity on whether courts can impose timelines on the president and the governors to act on bills passed by legislatures, Live Law reported. In its application, the state argued that the reference was an attempt to reopen and overturn the Supreme Court's April ruling in Tamil Nadu government's case against the governor. On July 22, the court issued notice to the Union government and all states on the reference made by President Droupadi Murmu under Article 143 of the Constitution. According to Article 143 of the Constitution, the president may refer any question of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court for its opinion. The president makes such a reference based on the advice of the Union council of ministers. In May, referencing 14 questions, Murmu asked whether the actions of governors and the president could be tried in court and whether such timelines could be imposed on them in the absence of any such provision in the law. The president also said that Article 200 and Article 201 of the Constitution do not prescribe deadlines or specific procedural requirements. In light of the reference, the Supreme Court set up a Constitution bench comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai, and Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar. In its application on Monday, Kerala argued that the reference was based on an 'erroneous statement' that Article 200 does not stipulate a time frame for governors to act on bills, Live Law reported. The state said that 11 out of the 14 questions raised by the president had already been addressed in the Supreme Court's ruling in the Tamil Nadu case. It alleged that the reference was a 'serious misuse' of Article 143, the legal news outlet reported. Kerala also said that the Union government had not filed a review or curative petition against the April judgement and had therefore accepted it. SC's ruling on Tamil Nadu versus governor The ruling on April 8 had come on a petition filed by the Tamil Nadu government after Governor RN Ravi did not act on several bills for more than three years before rejecting them and sending some to the president. In its judgement, the court held that governors must decide on bills within a reasonable time and cannot delay indefinitely under Article 200. Similarly, it said that the president must act within three months under Article 201, and any delay beyond that must be explained and communicated to the state government. Both sections outline the process of assent to bills by governors and the president. The judgement had also introduced the concept of ' deemed assent ' in cases of prolonged inaction by the governor or president, allowing pending bills to be considered approved.
The Wire
5 minutes ago
- The Wire
'I Want the Situation in Assam to be Explosive': Himanta's Communal Remark to Defend Gun License Decision
Communalism Sarma's comment had stemmed from his decision to issue from this August 1 gun licenses online to only 'indigenous' residents. New Delhi: 'I want the situation in Assam to be explosive.' Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma made this communally provocative statement when reporters asked him this past week if the situation in the state could turn 'explosive' if his government goes ahead with its decision to issue gun licenses to 'original inhabitants'. Speaking on the sidelines of an event organised at an agricultural project of the government at Gorukhuti in Sipajhar, Sarma said, 'Someday, the situation will be explosive in Assam. How will our people survive if there is an explosion?' Sarma's comment had stemmed from his decision to issue from this August 1 gun licenses online to only 'indigenous' residents. Since this May 28, he has been claiming that 'indigenous' people residing in 'vulnerable remote areas' of five districts of the state were feeling 'insecure' and therefore, his government would be 'lenient in giving licenses to eligible people' in those areas. The districts named by the chief minister – Dhubri, Morigaon, Barpeta, Nagaon and South Salmara-Mankachar – are where Muslims of Bengali origin are in large numbers. Sarma is often noted for pairing his decision to issue gun licenses to 'our' people with the massive eviction drive the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been carrying out in the state, affecting a large number of Bengali origin Muslims, locally called Miya Mussalman. The agricultural project at Gorukhuti was launched after a massive eviction drive was carried out in 2021 by Assam Police citing a Gauhati High Court general order to clear forest areas of eviction. That drive had killed an evictee, following which a government-appointed cameraperson was seen in a trial video clip jumping on his dead body. The Opposition parties in the state have been condemning the chief minister for his government's policy to issue gun license to local people in an election-bound state. State Congress chief Gaurav Gogoi had said, 'People of Assam want water, employment, education, and medical facilities, not guns." Citing the recent order of the Supreme Court coming down heavily on the Sarma government over alleged police access, Gogoi said the controversial move to issue gun licenses 'may lead to an increase in fake encounters.' After Sarma reiterated his government's policy on July 25, Asam Jatiya Parishad president Lurinjyoti Gogoi repeated his condemnation, calling it a 'dangerous' proposition, adding that it 'is an insult to police and Border Security Force' that guards the districts along the Assam-Bangladesh border. 'No less a veiled attempt at instigating violence in a poll-bound state' On asked about the Sarma government's decision, an editor of an Assamese daily agreed to give his opinion on condition of anonymity, 'What Sarma said at Gorukhuti was no less a veiled attempt at instigating violence in a poll-bound state. His decision to carry out eviction in Miya Mussalman areas and also bringing in a policy to issue gun licenses to khilonjia (indigenous) people in those areas must be seen together, as an attempt to communally awaken the majority Assamese community, particularly in Upper Assam, as his government is getting very unpopular in those areas, mainly due to charges of corruption and nepotism. Upper Assam, mind you, has the highest number of assembly segments.' The editor said, 'People are also seeing now a clear chief ministerial candidate in the Opposition camp in Gaurav Gogoi and that is making Sarma worried. The only thing that can perhaps save him is communal polarisation of votes.' Prior to the anti-foreigner Nellie massacre in 1983 in Assam, former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had made a speech which some considered it provocative. Journalist N P Ullekh, in his book, 'The Untold Vajpayee: Politician and Paradox', had mentioned that speech delivered a week before the massacre in Guwahati where he said ' a river of blood' would flow in Assam if elections were allowed by Indira Gandhi government to take place in 1983. In 1996, while debating a motion of confidence in the Lok Sabha moved by the then Vajpayee government, senior Left MP Indrajit Gupta had read out excerpts from that inflammatory speech of the BJP leader. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lok Sabha adjourned till 1 pm amid Opposition protests on Bihar's SIR
The Lok Sabha was adjourned till 1 pm on Monday amid opposition protests on revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, delaying the start of the discussion on Operation Sindoor. Opposition members were in the well of the Lok Sabha, raising slogans on the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, when the House reconvened at noon for the discussion on Operation Sindoor. "There is something called commitment. Leaders of all parties had sought a discussion on Operation Sindoor and now you are in the well of the House raising other issues," Speaker Om Birla said while addressing opposition members. "If you want a discussion on Operation Sindoor, you will have to go back to your seats. You can't demand a discussion on any issue from the Well of the House. The House runs as per rules of procedure," Birla said. Union ministers Rajnath Singh, Amit Shah and Nitin Gadkari among others were present in the House at the time. Defence Minister Singh is scheduled to initiate the special discussion on India's strong, successful and decisive Operation Sindoor in response to the terror attack in Pahalgam. As the opposition was unrelenting, Birla adjourned the proceedings till 1 pm. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
